11 Acknowledged

It is regrettable that the Government chose to engage in this negotiation without first articulating...

Recommendation
It is regrettable that the Government chose to engage in this negotiation without first articulating the core standards that the food imported into the UK must meet. Setting out core standards would have strengthened the hand of British negotiators, reassured the relevant sectors of the Government’s commitment to such standards, and helped raise standards globally. However, we do welcome the fact that this deal does not prevent the Government adopting core standards—or other trade measures such as a carbon adjustment tax—in the future. We reiterate our previous call for the 38 Australia FTA: Food and Agriculture Government to adopt a system of core standards, which we believe would make it easier for UK negotiators to get of other countries agree to meet equivalent standards to those in place in the UK. Core standards should be in place before any further FTAs that cover the food sector are agreed.
Government Response Summary
The government restates its commitment to upholding high standards and ensuring that farmers are not undercut by unfair competition, noting that all imported products need to meet the UK's SPS import requirements.
Paragraph Reference
77
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government Acknowledged
The Government is committed to realising the benefits of greater trade, whilst upholding high environmental, food safety and animal welfare standards, and ensuring that its approach works for UK consumers, farmers and businesses. All imported products need to meet the UK’s SPS import requirements. On animal welfare, we will look at all standards and the materiality of any differences given the likely volume of trade. We will make sure—by using a range of tools, including tariffs, quotas, and safeguards—that Britain’s farmers are not undercut by unfair competition from those with lower standards.
Timeline
Recommendation age 4.0 yrs
Report published 17 Jun 2022