10 Accepted

ELM schemes require attractive payment rates and solutions for capital investment barriers.

Conclusion
The Government’s Environmental Land Management (ELM) schemes are an important economic incentive to protect and restore natural assets, such as soils. Until private ecosystem marketplaces are fully regulated and established for a variety of soil health benefits, ELM schemes will be the main tool for encouraging the restoration of soil health. Most stakeholders believe that paying for sustainable practices is the right approach, although effective regulation and evaluation will be essential to ensure that they deliver the right outcomes. Attractive payment rates will also be crucial, rates many believe to be too low at present. Higher rates that reflect environmental benefits and additional costs could boost take-up, lead to further savings in the longer term, keep ELMs true to the ‘public money for public goods’ philosophy, and keep the Government on track to meet its targets. ELMs also do not, in general, address the capital investment barriers to more sustainable farming, although we recognise that some grant funding has been made available. The Government needs to keep a careful eye on this problem and come up with solutions if needed.
Government Response Summary
The government stated the expanded SFI already includes soil improvement actions and committed to monitoring scheme effectiveness for economic barriers, considering further actions if needed. They also committed to defining 'sustainable soil management' in a clear, practical way with stakeholder engagement.
Paragraph Reference
49
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government Accepted
We believe the recent expansion of the SFI in 2024 already incorporates many well- established actions for soil improvement. We will continue to monitor the scheme’s effectiveness and, based on ongoing data and research, consider adding further actions if evidence suggests specific economic barriers are hindering their adoption by farmers. As part of our ongoing review of CS, we will explore ways to offer options that build upon the actions under SFI, for example if analysis of soil health trends identifies areas where additional support is needed. We recognise the value in establishing a shared understanding of “sustainable soil management” within the agricultural sector. We aim to define this concept in a clear, practical way that recognizes regional variations and individual farm contexts, including appropriate stakeholder engagement. The actions under SFI and CS will be vital to achieving our ambition to have 60% of agricultural soil under sustainable management through our farming schemes by 2030. We will continue to track progress towards this target and keep the targets framework under review.
Timeline
Recommendation age 2.5 yrs
Report published 05 Dec 2023