7 Rejected

Develop a co-produced framework for responding to research misconduct cases effectively

Recommendation
The UK’s lacks an established infrastructure for responding to research misconduct cases. The UK Government should lead on a co-produced framework with the UK Reproducibility Network, UKRIO and UK CORI, which sets out the roles and expectations for key actors when cases of misconduct are identified.
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to lead on a co-produced framework for responding to research misconduct cases, asserting that government should not investigate misconduct and that primary responsibility lies with research organisations.
Paragraph Reference
60
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government Rejected
We do not accept these recommendations. 17. The Government should not be in the business of investigating research misconduct but should ensure it supports an effective research environment that can self- regulate and respond when misconduct is identified. 18. This needs to be addressed at a system-wide level and reproducibility should be one of a number of mechanisms to promote integrity. 19. In cases where there is intentional research misconduct (i.e. manipulating statistical results or falsification of data) the Government agrees that this should be taken extremely seriously. UKRI have published clear guidelines on what constitutes research misconduct and are responsible for ensuring that recipients of funding are aware of the requirements and reporting of research misconduct, and that these are openly stated.
Addressee Bodies
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Timeline
Recommendation age 3.1 yrs
Report published 10 May 2023