15 Accepted in Part

Implement a trial funding programme for 'slower' science and consult researchers on grant sufficiency

Recommendation
Short-term research grants place restrictive limitations on researchers, which can be to the detriment of research integrity and reproducibility. UKRI should consult with a representative sample of researchers to understand whether their grants allow them sufficient time and funding to do the work needed for ensuring their research is reproducible. UKRI should also implement a trial funding programme with an emphasis on ‘slower’ science.
Government Response Summary
The government partially accepts the recommendation, stating UKRI already funds a range of long-term projects and believes changing incentives is crucial beyond just grant length. While committed to continuing stakeholder work and experimenting with funding approaches, it does not explicitly commit to a new consultation with researchers or a dedicated trial funding programme for 'slower' science.
Paragraph Reference
88
Government Response
Accepted in Part
HM Government Accepted in Part
We partially accept this recommendation. 44. UKRI funds work across a range of timeframes to support a diversity of people and projects across different stages of the research process. In addition to long-standing investments in more than 60 Centres, Institutes, and Units, UKRI offers a portfolio of longer funded research projects. This includes the EPSRC manufacturing research hubs15 running for seven years and the BBSRC strategic longer and larger funding mechanism.16 45. Without changing the incentive system, the pressures on researchers, irrespective of grant length, will continue. The “slow science” movement has as core to its manifesto “doing less better”. For example, one of its more radical proposals is to ration the number of publications a researcher is allowed to produce. Under current incentives, longer grants simply ramp up expectations for more outputs. 46. UKRI is committed to continuing work with stakeholders to understand and address the most pressing issues impacting research quality. We are continually experimenting with funding approaches that support this endeavour, drawing on and contributing to the evidence base needed for progress.
Addressee Bodies
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Timeline
Recommendation age 3.1 yrs
Report published 10 May 2023