19

While the Government is thinking about the best way to establish a new UK research...

Conclusion
While the Government is thinking about the best way to establish a new UK research funding agency and acting on its pledge to reduce unnecessary bureaucracy in the UK research and innovation system, it is a good time for it to reflect on the bureaucratic constraints that apply to the funding bodies operating under the UKRI framework. It is right that UKRI is held accountable for the public money it spends, but the temptation to micromanage it must be considered alongside its need to operate in an agile and efficient way—for example regarding decisions on which projects should be started or stopped—and its potential, through the coordination of interdisciplinary research and innovation efforts, to strategically tackle the large- scale national challenges facing the UK. The Government’s policy paper on reducing the bureaucratic burden in research is a step in the right direction.
Paragraph Reference
116
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government Acknowledged
In recommendation 20 (paragraph 117) the Committee refers to bureaucratic constraints on UKRI. The Government has been working closely with UKRI on a review of bureaucracy as trailed in the R&D Roadmap which the Committee has noted and welcomed. The Review will build on the work already being undertaken by research funders, including UKRI, to simplify and streamline processes. The Review will run until early 2022 with interim findings expected by the autumn of 2021. In addition, UKRI’s ‘Reforming our Business’ programme is identifying improvements that can be made to the way the organisation operates in order to ensure efficiency. A number of reviews are in train addressing other aspects of UKRI and the research and innovation system and we are conscious of the need to manage the number of reviews underway at any one time.
Addressee Bodies
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Timeline
Recommendation age 5.3 yrs
Report published 12 Feb 2021