12
SMEs should be subject to lighter mHRDD requirements than larger companies, which should be proportional...
Conclusion
SMEs should be subject to lighter mHRDD requirements than larger companies, which should be proportional and risk-based to manage the specific risks of forced labour in their supply chains. Policymakers should support SMEs with guidance, tools and resources to help them comply without excessive burdens. (Recommendation, Paragraph 91)
Government Response
Accepted
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government
Accepted
We are actively reviewing the effectiveness of existing UK measures, including as part of the RBC review, and considering the implications of a variety of approaches to tackle forced labour in supply chains. We continue to engage with international partners to support our shared goal of combatting forced labour in supply chains. FCDO is leading the National Baseline Assessment to assess the current level of implementation of the three pillars of the UN Guiding Principles, by the UK government and UK businesses. 8 Import bans–state-imposed forced labour JCHR Recommendation 13 13. The import ban recommended above must clarify that no company which uses or allows state-imposed forced labour in its supply chains can import goods to the UK. (Paragraph 137) Government Response The Government remains firmly opposed to the use of state-imposed forced labour. We are considering how best to reflect this position within our broader frameworks for trade policy and responsible business conduct. It is important to consider the operational and legal complexities involved. We will continue to assess the most effective means of addressing this issue, including through existing due diligence and transparency mechanisms. 9 Implementing import bans JCHR Recommendation 14 14. In taking steps to enable Border Force officers to find illicit consignments, the Government should ensure they are enabled to search out consignments of goods linked to forced labour. (Paragraph 148) Government Response Tackling forced labour requires a whole-system approach of which the border is a part. Any approach would need to define the scale and scope of the activity alongside any potential legislative and resourcing requirements. JCHR Recommendation 15 15. To aid enforcement, the UK’s import ban should include a rebuttable presumption that goods linked to regions where the UK Government considers state-imposed forced labour is imposed are linked to forced labour until proven otherwise. (Paragraph 155) Government Response The rebuttable presumption model is one of multiple mechanisms used by international partners to enforce forced labour import bans. We will continue to assess and evaluate the effectiveness of existing measures, including data-driven and risk-based approaches as well as where the burden of proof may sit. JCHR Recommendation 16 16. The UK’s import ban should establish or designate a responsible body to oversee the implementation of the import ban by facilitating data sharing and co-ordinating activity between different law enforcement agencies. Such a body must be provided with adequate powers and resources to fulfil this function. (Paragraph 156) Government Response The Government agrees that effective coordination is integral to tackling forced labour in supply chains. Decisions regarding oversight and enforcement of actions to tackle forced labour in supply chains will be made in light of ongoing policy development and resource considerations. We remain committed to ensuring that any future arrangements are coherent, efficient, and capable of delivering meaningful impact. JCHR Recommendation 17 17. The NCA and Border Force should use the existing powers under POCA to prevent goods linked to forced labour being sold in the UK and to seize assets linked to forced labour. (Paragraph 179) Government Response POCA provides law enforcement agencies with a powerful range of powers to seize cash and assets from individuals profiting from criminal activity. Government cannot direct how the POCA powers are used by law enforcement and independent operational decisions are a matter for the NCA. Criminal investigations and prosecutions are dealt with on a case-by-case basis by the relevant agencies. 10 Impacts of labour rights clauses in trade agreements JCHR Recommendation 18 18. The Government should make it an explicit policy to include provisions concerning forced labour in future trade deals. (Paragraph 201) Government Response The Government recognises that free trade agreements are an important tool to help prevent, identify and eliminate forced labour in global supply chains. The UK will continue to pursue the inclusion of forced labour provisions in our free trade agreements. The UK has specific articles on forced labour in its FTAs with Australia, New Zealand and in the CPTPP. In the UK-NZ FTA, for instance, both parties commit to tackling forced labour within supply chains; and in the recently signed UK-India FTA both countries agreed to provisions to discourage forced and compulsory labour. FTAs are however just one of the UK’s tools for addressing forced labour in supply chains. The Developing Countries Trading Scheme allows for the suspension of preferential trading agreements on grounds of serious violation of labour rights, and UK Export Finance reviews social, and human rights risk factors for transactions in scope of their policy. Work also continues in the multilateral space to support the eradication of forced labour i
Source
Committee
Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Report
6th Report - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains
24 Jul 2025
HC 633
Addressee Bodies
Ministry of Justice
Timeline
Recommendation age
0.9 yr
Report published
24 Jul 2025