6
While the evidence we have received supports the view that rushing implementation of the Bill...
Conclusion
While the evidence we have received supports the view that rushing implementation of the Bill could undermine efforts to improve the treatment of autistic people and people with learning disabilities, we also note that the implementation of other substantial changes in the law in this area have suffered from excessive delays. Most obviously, the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019, which provides for the replacement of DoLS with Liberty Protection Safeguards, has still not been brought into force. An uncertain target of implementation “where there are strong community services in place” provides little reassurance. Those affected have already waited a long time for this reform and the Bill must not be allowed to lie fallow. (Conclusion, Paragraph 59)
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 11 July 2025. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document.
Source
Committee
Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Inquiry
Mental Health Bill
Report
3rd Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Mental Health Bill
19 May 2025
HC 601
Addressee Bodies
Ministry of Justice
Timeline
Recommendation age
1.3 yr
Report published
19 May 2025