On the 18/h March 2011 an Investigation was commenced into the death of Dr Edward James Slaney, then aged 35 years ("the Deceased") The Investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 3rd December 2013 The conclusion of the Inquest was a Narrative Conclusion; namely:- "At approximately Zpm on the 10th March 2011 the Deceased was in the process of crossing Neville Street in Leeds when an approaching 2006 DAF LF curtain sided medium goods vehicle registration numbel was overturned on to its offside as a result of prevailing high wind speeds, which wind speeds were caused by the building situate at and known as Bridgewater Place in Leeds _ The Deceased became trapped under the said medium goods vehicle and sustained fatal injuries from which he passed away Deceased's death was certified at 2.35pm on the 10th March 2011 at The General Infirmary at Leeds

On the 10"h March 2011, just before Zpm; the Deceased was crossing Neville Street in Leeds towards Water Lane when a medium sized goods vehicle was travelling along Victoria Road in the direction of Neville Street On that the winds were but were not exceptional. As the vehicle entered the entrance to Water Lane, the wind hit the side of the vehicle and took it in the direction of the Deceased . The vehicle came to rest on its offside trapping the Deceased underneath The Deceased sustained fatal chest injuries from which he died; his death being certified at 2.35pm on the same day at The General Infirmary, Leeds_ The vehicle blew over due to high wind gusts prevailing around the building known as Bridgewater Place, which building is situate at the junction of Water Lane and Victoria Road in Leeds This is a busy location for all highway users The wind speeds were generated and accelerated by the building: In November 2001_ planning permission was granted for the erection of the building subject to conditions In April 2004 a wind study report dated the 4th October 2001 of the wind environment around the proposed building was submitted. The report dealt with pedestrian comfort around the building_ It did not address pedestrian safety_or the effect(s)_upon motor_ The day strong vehicles or high-sided vehicles. There is no standardisation of criteria employed in the preparation of such reports, and there is no obligation to consider pedestrian safety and the effects upon all types of highway user. There is no guidance for planning authorities as to the considerations necessary in relation to the wind effects of tall buildings. A standard sized motor vehicle will be affected by wind speeds of 15 to 20 metres per second_ Development works commenced in June 2004 and the building was completed in March 2007 Since January 2007 the building has, at times, created difficult and hazardous conditions for third parties_ A scheme has been identified which, it is anticipated, will ameliorate or mitigate, but not eliminate, the wind tunnel effect created by the building_ This scheme has not been put into effect,