Peter Banks
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2014-0124
No published response · Over 2 years old
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
12 May 2014
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner's Concerns
_ (1) At the Inquest heard that the crossing point in Westhead Avenue, Stafford marked by way of tactile paving is probably too close to the main Weston Road. A suggestion was that the protective railings should be extended into Westhead Avenue and the crossing point moved further into that road. (2) (3)
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power t0 take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 of the date of this report; namely by 12 20141, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons and Mr D Winter; HM Senior Coroner for the City of Sunderland: am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form_ He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest: You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner, 17 March 2014 Andrew A Haigh Signed. HM Senior Coroner Staffordshire (South) days May
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power t0 take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 of the date of this report; namely by 12 20141, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons and Mr D Winter; HM Senior Coroner for the City of Sunderland: am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form_ He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest: You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner, 17 March 2014 Andrew A Haigh Signed. HM Senior Coroner Staffordshire (South) days May
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 22 May 2013 commenced an investigation into the death of Peter Desmond Vickers Banks aged 82. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 6 March 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was Road Traffic Accident. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Banks died at the University Hospital of North Staffordshire on 16 May 2013 from injuries sustained in a road traffic collision in Stafford on 5 May 2013. As a pedestrian he had begun to cross a road when he was hit by a car making a right turn into that road:
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Revise signal sighting standard to explicitly consider signal readability
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Define additional time required for reading gantry-mounted and complex signals
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Clarify "very short duration" definition within the signal sighting standard
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Identify and retrospectively review locations affected by "very short duration" ambiguity
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Clarify "overhead line equipment" in signal sighting standard to mean wires and droppers
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Define acceptable limits for temporary signal obscuration in sighting standards
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Explicitly define cab sight lines for signal positioning based on driver's eye
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Railtrack to conduct safety examination of Paddington station layout and operations.
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.