Paul Hyde
PFD Report
Partially Responded
Ref: 2014-0527
1 of 2 responded · Over 2 years old
Response Status
Responses
1 of 2
56-Day Deadline
24 Feb 2015
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner's Concerns
_ (1) On the 14th April 2014, GP Dr. Peter Devlin having anxieties expressed to him by one of the Community Mental Health Workers concerning Paul Hyde's deteriorating condition, sought advice from the Assessment and Treatment Team of the Community Mental Health Services He spoke to Graham Walton who advised him that he should refer Mr. Hyde back to ATS (Assessment and Treatment Service) He therefore wrote a letter on the 15th 2014 and this Hove July
VERONICA HAMILTON-DEELEY, LLB
VERONICA HAMILTON-DEELEY, LLB
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Your day delay triage the
In his evidence to you_ said that an appointment with himself would have been appropriate for Mr Hyde: You were understandably very concerned about this, as was, and our shared concerns have been thoroughly addressed within the Trust To reduce the likelihood of a similar occurrence in the future, the following improvements to the service have taken place in order to ensure all triage decisions are appropriate and clinically led: meeting with the CCG Clinical Lead, Sussex Partnership Clinical Lead for Community Services and Sussex Partnership Managers was held to review the ATS data to ensure all actions relating to referral management are clinically led and appropriate: In addition, Service Manager for the Assessment & Treatment Service for Brighton & Hove has agreed to undertake a quarterly audit of the triage outcome decisions with an independent senior clinician, to ensure our triage decisions are appropriate: We continue to discuss and review our performance against performance indicators with commissioners on a monthly basis and maintain an updated action plan to ensure this remains a continual focus for quality improvement_ We are always striving to improve the interface between primary care and secondary mental health services In order to improve relationships between GPs and Consultant Psychiatrists, GPs have been allocated named Consultant Psychiatrists_ Meetings between the psychiatrists and GPs have been arranged. js leading on this to ensure both GPs and psychiatrists are clear on their roles and the expectations of referrals Work is on- going to ensure there is a joined-up approach for our service users and their families and there is continual learning and improvement_ Mr Hyde's experience has been shared (anonymously) with staff to drivve home the lessons to be learned. In addition,to ensure widespread learning, feedback from the case has been given to Director of Nursing Standards and Safety _ This has guaranteed the issues are Iigh proille and education and understanding is widespread Furthermore, in order to educate all staff, lessons learned from Mr Hyde's experience have been included (anonymously) in the Trust's Quarterly Quality & Patient Safety Report. As you highlighted,we will never know if the outcome would have been different if Mr Hyde had been seen by prior to his sad death, however, we can reassure you that systems have been reviewed and improved and staff have carefully reflected on what happened_ Thank you once again for raising your concerns_ hope the actions outlined in this response demonstrate how important these issues are to the Trust, and how seriously we have taken the matters highlighted at Mr Hyde's inquest: feel sure that future service users will benefit from the lessons we have all learned following Mr Hyde's death and hope Mr Hyde's family can take some comfort in knowing this_
In his evidence to you_ said that an appointment with himself would have been appropriate for Mr Hyde: You were understandably very concerned about this, as was, and our shared concerns have been thoroughly addressed within the Trust To reduce the likelihood of a similar occurrence in the future, the following improvements to the service have taken place in order to ensure all triage decisions are appropriate and clinically led: meeting with the CCG Clinical Lead, Sussex Partnership Clinical Lead for Community Services and Sussex Partnership Managers was held to review the ATS data to ensure all actions relating to referral management are clinically led and appropriate: In addition, Service Manager for the Assessment & Treatment Service for Brighton & Hove has agreed to undertake a quarterly audit of the triage outcome decisions with an independent senior clinician, to ensure our triage decisions are appropriate: We continue to discuss and review our performance against performance indicators with commissioners on a monthly basis and maintain an updated action plan to ensure this remains a continual focus for quality improvement_ We are always striving to improve the interface between primary care and secondary mental health services In order to improve relationships between GPs and Consultant Psychiatrists, GPs have been allocated named Consultant Psychiatrists_ Meetings between the psychiatrists and GPs have been arranged. js leading on this to ensure both GPs and psychiatrists are clear on their roles and the expectations of referrals Work is on- going to ensure there is a joined-up approach for our service users and their families and there is continual learning and improvement_ Mr Hyde's experience has been shared (anonymously) with staff to drivve home the lessons to be learned. In addition,to ensure widespread learning, feedback from the case has been given to Director of Nursing Standards and Safety _ This has guaranteed the issues are Iigh proille and education and understanding is widespread Furthermore, in order to educate all staff, lessons learned from Mr Hyde's experience have been included (anonymously) in the Trust's Quarterly Quality & Patient Safety Report. As you highlighted,we will never know if the outcome would have been different if Mr Hyde had been seen by prior to his sad death, however, we can reassure you that systems have been reviewed and improved and staff have carefully reflected on what happened_ Thank you once again for raising your concerns_ hope the actions outlined in this response demonstrate how important these issues are to the Trust, and how seriously we have taken the matters highlighted at Mr Hyde's inquest: feel sure that future service users will benefit from the lessons we have all learned following Mr Hyde's death and hope Mr Hyde's family can take some comfort in knowing this_
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you AND your organisation have the power to take such action:
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 4th August 2014 commenced an investigation into the death of Paul Leslie HYDE_ The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 12th November 2014.The conclusion of the inquest was MISADVENTURE
Circumstances of the Death
See_Record of Inquest
Copies Sent To
VERONICA HAMILTON
DEELEY, LLB
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Responsibility for monitoring delivery of standards and quality
Mid Staffs Inquiry
GP oversight of specialist care
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.