Ronald Volante
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2016-0499
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 24 Mar 2016
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
24 Mar 2016
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) Magenta Living Support Link had access to Mr Volante’s medical history and there is no evidence that this was used to advise the ambulance service of his cardiac problems – is this covered in the induction training of call handlers? (2) Magenta Living Support Link were aware that there had been a change in Mr Volante’s presentation by 18.46 as he did not respond to the news that an ambulance was on the way – is this covered in induction training of call handlers with regard to advising a doctor or emergency service of a change in circumstances after the first call? (3) The training manual and method of training call handlers needs to be revisited in the light of the experience from Mr Volante’s tragic death (4)
Responses
Response received
View full response
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS RESPONSE OF MAGENTA LIVING TO CONCERNS OUTLINED PURSUANT TO REGULATION 28; REPORT TO PREVENT FURTHER DEATHS _ MR:VOLANTE In the case of Mr Ronald Volante Background Magenta Living delivers a Community Alarm monitoring service to our own tenants and as in the case of Mr. Volante;, to other local housing associations that do not provide their own monitoring services directly: The service Is a non-statutory housing related service aimed at promoting independent within a home setting: It is accredited by the TSA (Telecare Services Association) which is the national body against whose standards we are assessed, Magenta Living does not provide a visiting warden'$ service to this scheme. CORONER'S CONCERNS Magenta Support Link had access to Mr. Volante's medical history and there is no evidence that this was used to advise the ambulance servlce of his cardiac problems is this covered in the induction training of call handlers Current practice Hitherto the approach has been that once through to the Ambulance Control Centre the community alarm operator is taken through a set of standard questions by the Ambulance Service operator These questions are designed to elicit sufficient information in respect of the address, location, access arrangements and the condition ofthe person concerned and is used by the Ambulance Service to prioritise calls This is reflected in Magenta Living'$ written procedure, which is provided to all call handlers as part of their training, which states in relation to "Requesting ambulance attendance" , that "if requested by the ambulance service controller , the call handler shall provide such additional information as they have in respect of the incident and the building: Proactively providing medical history to the ambulance service at the point of initial contact by call handlers was not covered in induction training for call handlers. This does not form part of the procedure accredited by the TSA procedure was established in the context that the ambulance service Is in a better position to assess what information is and isn't relevant In Mr Volante's case, the Magenta Living call handler followed procedure and answered the questions posed to him by the ambulance service controller and no details regarding medical history were requested: Had the ambulance service controller requested such detail, they were In the position to assess whether medical history was relevant, our call handler would have provided the information Response to Coroner' $ concerns Following the concerns raised at the inquest and subsequently detailed in the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Further Deaths Notice we have revised how we will deal with calls to the Ambulance service. We have written to all ofour community alarm customers, including those organisations with whom we have contracts to provide a similar service. We have confirmed that with immediate effect that there will be an addition to current procedures in living Living The and
so far a5 we will share medical details at the point of contact with the emergency services unless service users specifically advise us otherwise As a result of this change of procedure, all Magenta Living community alarmed trained call handlers were briefed with effect from 28th January 2016 as to this change and provided with a copv of the updated procedure that now includes this additional stage. As part of this discussion, staff confirmed their understanding of the new procedure which Is recorded in their training record: This of procedure will also be addressed with new staff as part of their normal induction programme_ Additionally, a5 part of our commitment to improve service standards, we have liaised directly with the TSA and discussed in detail the concerns raised by the Coroner: Whilst the TSA reaffirmed that there is currently no national requirement to share medical information with the emergency services, the TSA has confirmed their intention to review the relevant parts of their Code of Practice. The TSA has indicated that they aim to introduce measures to ensure that the provision of medical history to the ambulance service is embedded within the Standards Framework within the Code of Practice as national practice in the future; Upon receipt of the amended Standards Framework from the TSA, we will provide a copy to the Coroner Magenta Living Support Link were aware that there had been a change in Mr. Volante's presentation by 18,46 as he did not respond to the news that an ambulance was on the way - is this covered in induction training of call handlers with regard to advising a doctor or emergency service of a change in circumstances after the first call Current practice Historically, a change of circumstances would not result in a call handler updating the emergency services To provide context this Is because of the way the contact centre is connected to the sheltered housing scheme: The contact centre is connected to each scheme via a telephone line which allows the call handler the ability to speak with a resident who has activated the alarm as well as being able to control the communal door entry system to the block of flats When an alarm is activated by a resident, the call would be closed down once the next of kin or ambulance service had been notified and as such a change of circumstance would not necessarily be evident: This practice was adopted due to the fact that keeping the line open could potentiallv impact upon our ability to respond to further activations from residents at the same scheme and to provide remote access to the emergency services when they arrive through the communal door entry system. Response to Coroner'$ concerns In light of the Coroner'$ concerns, all Magenta Living'$ community alarm call handlers have been briefed with effect from 28th January 2016 that they should update the emergency services of any change in the client'$ circumstances presentation as soon as these are known; To achieve this and to take into account the resource pressure experienced by the North West Ambulance Service and the Impact upon their response times, we have now adopted a policy whereby a call handler will maintaln regular contact with the resident until their key holders (next of kin) or emergency services arrive. This change of practice has been updated in our revised procedure: It is hoped that this approach will provide support change any
to the North West Ambulance Service and assurance to those affected by delays in respect of ambulance response times: As detailed above; all Magenta Living community alarmed trained call handlers have been briefed in respect of this change and provided with a copy of the procedure that now includes these additional stages. As part of the discussion, staff confirmed their understanding of the new procedure which Is recorded in their training record. This change of procedure will also be addressed with any new staff a5 part of their normal induction programme: The training manual and method of training call handlers needs to be revisited in light of the experience from Mr. Volante'$ tragic death Current practice Magenta Living's has a thorough, comprehensive training and induction programme which is accredited by the TSA. Individual performance is regularlv monitored through work reviews, team meetings, auditing and quality assurance, coaching; external auditing (for accreditation purposes), contract monitoring and customer feedback; Response to Coroner'$ concerns However, in light of the Coroner'$ concerns and appreciating that standards can always be improved, Magenta Living has incorporated a number of additions to the procedures manual as a result of the Coroner's recommendations as set out above: Our standard practice, which has been followed in respect of these changes, is that ay changes or amendments made to procedures are always quickly communicated to staff across the various shifts. This is carried out on a one-to-one basis ad also at team level. For assurance purposes, Team Leaders and managers ensure staff implement any changes smoothly ad effectively and measures are put in place to monitor this such as spot auditing listening to call recordings, data checks_ concerns are immediately brought to the attention of the member of staff and a performance improvement plan is established; This may include for example further coaching, side by side monitoring and peer support until an acceptable performance level is attained: As a learning organisation, training for Magenta community alarm handlers is continuous and this approach will continue DATED 23 MARCH 2016 Any Llving
so far a5 we will share medical details at the point of contact with the emergency services unless service users specifically advise us otherwise As a result of this change of procedure, all Magenta Living community alarmed trained call handlers were briefed with effect from 28th January 2016 as to this change and provided with a copv of the updated procedure that now includes this additional stage. As part of this discussion, staff confirmed their understanding of the new procedure which Is recorded in their training record: This of procedure will also be addressed with new staff as part of their normal induction programme_ Additionally, a5 part of our commitment to improve service standards, we have liaised directly with the TSA and discussed in detail the concerns raised by the Coroner: Whilst the TSA reaffirmed that there is currently no national requirement to share medical information with the emergency services, the TSA has confirmed their intention to review the relevant parts of their Code of Practice. The TSA has indicated that they aim to introduce measures to ensure that the provision of medical history to the ambulance service is embedded within the Standards Framework within the Code of Practice as national practice in the future; Upon receipt of the amended Standards Framework from the TSA, we will provide a copy to the Coroner Magenta Living Support Link were aware that there had been a change in Mr. Volante's presentation by 18,46 as he did not respond to the news that an ambulance was on the way - is this covered in induction training of call handlers with regard to advising a doctor or emergency service of a change in circumstances after the first call Current practice Historically, a change of circumstances would not result in a call handler updating the emergency services To provide context this Is because of the way the contact centre is connected to the sheltered housing scheme: The contact centre is connected to each scheme via a telephone line which allows the call handler the ability to speak with a resident who has activated the alarm as well as being able to control the communal door entry system to the block of flats When an alarm is activated by a resident, the call would be closed down once the next of kin or ambulance service had been notified and as such a change of circumstance would not necessarily be evident: This practice was adopted due to the fact that keeping the line open could potentiallv impact upon our ability to respond to further activations from residents at the same scheme and to provide remote access to the emergency services when they arrive through the communal door entry system. Response to Coroner'$ concerns In light of the Coroner'$ concerns, all Magenta Living'$ community alarm call handlers have been briefed with effect from 28th January 2016 that they should update the emergency services of any change in the client'$ circumstances presentation as soon as these are known; To achieve this and to take into account the resource pressure experienced by the North West Ambulance Service and the Impact upon their response times, we have now adopted a policy whereby a call handler will maintaln regular contact with the resident until their key holders (next of kin) or emergency services arrive. This change of practice has been updated in our revised procedure: It is hoped that this approach will provide support change any
to the North West Ambulance Service and assurance to those affected by delays in respect of ambulance response times: As detailed above; all Magenta Living community alarmed trained call handlers have been briefed in respect of this change and provided with a copy of the procedure that now includes these additional stages. As part of the discussion, staff confirmed their understanding of the new procedure which Is recorded in their training record. This change of procedure will also be addressed with any new staff a5 part of their normal induction programme: The training manual and method of training call handlers needs to be revisited in light of the experience from Mr. Volante'$ tragic death Current practice Magenta Living's has a thorough, comprehensive training and induction programme which is accredited by the TSA. Individual performance is regularlv monitored through work reviews, team meetings, auditing and quality assurance, coaching; external auditing (for accreditation purposes), contract monitoring and customer feedback; Response to Coroner'$ concerns However, in light of the Coroner'$ concerns and appreciating that standards can always be improved, Magenta Living has incorporated a number of additions to the procedures manual as a result of the Coroner's recommendations as set out above: Our standard practice, which has been followed in respect of these changes, is that ay changes or amendments made to procedures are always quickly communicated to staff across the various shifts. This is carried out on a one-to-one basis ad also at team level. For assurance purposes, Team Leaders and managers ensure staff implement any changes smoothly ad effectively and measures are put in place to monitor this such as spot auditing listening to call recordings, data checks_ concerns are immediately brought to the attention of the member of staff and a performance improvement plan is established; This may include for example further coaching, side by side monitoring and peer support until an acceptable performance level is attained: As a learning organisation, training for Magenta community alarm handlers is continuous and this approach will continue DATED 23 MARCH 2016 Any Llving
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 13th November 2015 I commenced an investigation into the death of Ronald VOLANTE, Aged 74. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 28th January 2016. The conclusion of the inquest was
Ia Ischaemic Heart Disease
Ronald Volante has died of Natural Causes it is not possible from the evidence to say that there was an opportunity to have prevented his death
Ia Ischaemic Heart Disease
Ronald Volante has died of Natural Causes it is not possible from the evidence to say that there was an opportunity to have prevented his death
Circumstances of the Death
Ronald Volante suffered from coronary artery disease which has caused ischaemic heart disease and an enlarged heart. He had previously suffered a myocardial infarction which required triple vessel coronary artery bypass grafting. Ronald Volante was in difficulty at 18.35 on 5th November 2015 and called an out of hours alarm monitoring service shouting for help. The monitoring service are not contracted to respond in person within this sheltered accommodation tenancy agreement. The monitoring service made attempts to contact Mr Volante's next of kin. An ambulance was called at 18.38 and from the information given the call was coded as green 2 for an ambulance to be dispatch as soon as possible. This was a busy bonfire night and was coded green 2 because Mr Volante was breathing and conscious. The ambulance were not given information from Mr Volante's medical notes nor were they alerted that by the time the call between he monitoring service and Mr Volante finished at 18.46, Mr Volante was no longer responding to information that an ambulance had been called - this was a change in circumstances as there was no longer evidence that Mr Volante was conscious and breathing. The ambulance arrived at 20.28 and Mr Volante was already deceased being certified at 20.29. It is found that Mr Volante died at some time between 18.35 and 20.29.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.