Dildar Shariff
PFD Report
Partially Responded
Ref: 2016-0321
2 of 3 responded · Over 2 years old
Response Status
Responses
2 of 3
56-Day Deadline
2 Nov 2016
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
Evidence was given that patients who are undergoing haemodialysis or with significant uremia due to renal failure, such as Mr Shariff, are at increased risk of a haemorrhage and that this is not commonly known within the medical profession or referred to in the relevant NICE guidelines. This lack of awareness could create a risk that other deaths will continue to exist or occur in the future and whilst I am satisfied that the Trust have taken this matter very seriously, in that they have implemented appropriate measures to reduce the risk of this occurring in the future, I am concerned with the National picture as I am mindful that it may take some time for the significance of a head injury within patients with undergoing haemodialysis or with significant uremia due to renal failure to be incorporated into the NICE guidelines.
Responses
Response received
View full response
From the Lord Prior of Brampton Department Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Health (Lords) of Health 0 Ms Julie Robertson Richmond House Assistant Coroner for Manchester North 79 Whitehall London HM Coroner' s Office SWIA ZNS Phoenix Centre, LICPL Stephen Shaw MC Rochdale Tel: 020 7210 4850 OLIO ILR 13 OCT 2016 Lkbc Thank you for your report of 7 September 2016, following the inquest into the death of Dildar Shariff: [ was very sorry to hear of Mr Shariff s death in 2016 and wish to extend my sincere condolences to his family: In your letter you consider there to be a lack of awareness among clinicians that an increased risk of haemorrhage is likely to occur in people undergoing haemodialysis, or those with significant uremia due to renal failure. You have therefore asked NICE to consider amending its relevant guidance for clinicians. Iam aware of NICE'$ response and have noted its decision not to update its guidelines at the moment in relation to assessment and early management ofhead injury: Inote that NICE has logged your report and the information will be looked at when the guidance is next updated in 2017. Lam grateful to you for bringing the circumstances of Mr Shariff s death to my attention DAVID PRIOR '2006 OCt Way Mr May again
Response received
View full response
Dear Ms Robertson, I write in response to the Regulation 28 Report into the death of Mr Dildar Shariff. I was very sorry to learn of Mr Shariff’s death You explain in your report that you consider there to be a lack of awareness within the medical profession that people undergoing haemodialysis, or those with significant uremia due to renal failure, are at increased risk of a haemorrhage. Subsequently, you’ve asked for the significance of a head injury in such people to be incorporated into NICE guidelines. We have noted the circumstances around Mr Shariff’s death and the concerns you have raised, in relation to our existing guideline on the assessment and early management of head injury (accessible from our website: www.nice.org.uk/cg1 76). Where our head injury guideline refers to “any history of bleeding or clotting disorders” as a risk factor in the assessment of head injury, we do not list all the possible causes or scenarios, as it would be difficult to offer an exhaustive list. However, it is our view that it is widely known by clinicians that people with renal failure, including those with uremia or on haemodialysis, are at an increased risk of bleeding (especially where warfarin anticoagulation is used). Based on the circumstances you have described, we believe that at the second visit to the urgent care centre there was an opportunity for Mr Shariff to have had a CT scan (see recommendations in our head injury guideline that cover the criteria for performing a CT head scan in adults, specifically recommendations 1 .4.7 and 1 .4.8 which refer to risk factors of “more than I episode of vomiting” and “any history of bleeding or clotting disorders”, respectively). Alternatively, he could have been admitted for observation (see recommendation 1 .8, which sets out the criteria for
I nice©nice.org.uk
admitting patients to hospital following a head injury, and includes “Continuing worrying signs (for example, persistent vomiting, severe headaches) of concern to the clinician” in the list). While we believe that our guideline does not need to be amended as a result of your report, your concerns have been logged with our guideline surveillance team, for their information when the guidance is next considered for update in 2017.
I nice©nice.org.uk
admitting patients to hospital following a head injury, and includes “Continuing worrying signs (for example, persistent vomiting, severe headaches) of concern to the clinician” in the list). While we believe that our guideline does not need to be amended as a result of your report, your concerns have been logged with our guideline surveillance team, for their information when the guidance is next considered for update in 2017.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 10 May 2016 I commenced an investigation into the death of Dildar Shariff. The inquest into Mr Shariff’s death was heard on 7 September 2016.
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Shariff died on 10 May 2016 at Fairfield General Hospital having been admitted following a cardiac arrest at his home address that day. He had had an unwitnessed fallen from a chair onto his kitchen floor on 8 May and attended at the Urgent Care Centre promptly following that fall. Neither a CT scan nor additional neurological observations were undertaken during that consultation. Mr Shariff attended the Urgent Care Centre again on 9 May with a history of head pain and recent vomiting. No CT scan was undertaken notwithstanding those symptoms and Mr Shariff was discharged home. On 10 May Mr Shariff was taken to hospital by attending paramedics where the presence of an intracerebral haemorrhage was confirmed. Mr Shariff was undergoing haemodialysis, which placed him at increased risk of haemorrhage. This was not appreciated by attending clinicians due to this not being referred to within the NICE guidelines for head injuries.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.