Joan McIndoe

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2020-0138
Date of Report 1 July 2020
Coroner Alison Mutch
Coroner Area Manchester South
Response Deadline est. 25 November 2020
All 1 response received · Deadline: 25 Nov 2020
Response Status
Responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 25 Nov 2020
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner's Concerns
I The MA TIERS OF CONCERN are as follows. - \
1. The inquest was told that all such calls as this from residential facilities where contact cannot be established with the resident are automatically categorised as a Category 4 response by the ambulance service. This is in contrast to where a call is initiated I and then contact is lost during the call.
2. During the course of the inquest evidence was given that there is a lack of clarity about expectations for updates once a call has been placed by a call centre to the ambulance service. As a I result there is no way of understanding if the position is evolving I for example as in this case where the alarm kept going off and I there was still no response from Mrs Mcindoe.
Responses
Dept for Health and Social Care
3 Dec 2020
Response received
View full response
Dear Ms Mutch Thank you for your letter of 2020 to Matt Hancock about the death of Joan Margaret Mclndoe. am replying as Minister with responsibility for ambulance services and | am grateful for the additional time in which to do so_ First; would like to offer my sincere condolences to the family and loved ones of Mrs McIndoe; We must do all we can to take the learnings - the circumstances of Mrs Mclndoe's death to improve the safety of others. report raises two matters of concern relating to interaction between telecare monitoring agencies and ambulance services and my officials have sought the advice of the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (the AACE); NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSEI); and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in preparing this response: The AACE provides central support and cO-ordination to ambulance services to assist with implementation of national policy and the improvement of patient care Although the AACE is not constituted to mandate or instruct ambulance services, it facilitates and enables the development of good practice. This includes consideration of concerns identified by coroners, where the AACE's National Ambulance Medical Directors Group will discuss and disseminate learning from Prevention of Future Deaths reports The concerns in your report have been brought to the attention of the AACE. In relation to the categorisation of calls from alarm monitoring agencies by ambulance services, where contact with a resident has not been established, am advised by the AACE that the Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System (AMPDS) an internationally recognised system that is used by around half of all ambulance services in the country including the North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) this type of call is mapped to Category 5. This means that calls of this nature should automatically receive an initial July - from Your

clinical assessment so that an ambulance clinician can assess the call and attempt to obtain information to establish the type of response that is required. This might include but is not limited to upgrading the incident for an expedited face to face assessment Or conducting further telephone triage. Similarly, am advised that NHS Pathways allows for a call handler t0 transfer the call to a clinician for further assessment and risk management: There might also be local operational procedures in place to support the management of alarm calls by ambulance services. am not able to comment on the specifics of this case. However; as with all serious incidents, expect the North West Ambulance Service to reflect carefully on the circumstances of Mrs Mclndoe's death and the findings of your investigation and to identify and take forward any actions for improvement: In relation to the second matter of concern about clarifying the expectations of telecare monitoring agencies t? provide updates to the ambulance service t0 aid understanding of how incidents are evolving, it is key that alarm monitoring agencies gather as much information as possible about the alarm call to help ambulance services determine if an ambulance response is required (and the category of the response) or if a local response is more appropriate. am advised that the AACE has identified a need for greater clarity and consistency around the interaction between telecare monitoring agencies and ambulance services and the AACE is engaging with the Technology Enabled Care Services Association (TSA) a membership organisation for technology enabled care providers, on these matters with the aim of influencing how telecare providers engage with ambulance services; The AACE will the circumstances of Mrs McIndoe's death and the concerns you have raised to the attention of the TSA to inform these discussions In addition; am advised that the AACE is encouraging ambulance services to collect data on the type and numbers of calls receive from telecare monitoring agencies to further support consideration of these matters. Youmayalso wish to note that norther ambulance services are supporting work to explore how a decision support tool could assist telecare monitoring agencies to decide when to transfer calls to the ambulance service (and the type of information required by ambulance services to determine the category of response), or other locally agreed pathways of care this provides assurance that action is being taken to improve and strengthen the interaction between ambulance services and telecare monitoring agencies In addition; NHSEI is in regular and close contact with the AACE, where concerns such as the interaction between ambulance services and alarm monitoring agencies continue to be discussed: bring they ' hope

Technology enabled care providers play a vital role in supporting the independence, health and safety of older and vulnerable people and in doing s0, it is essential that can demonstrate the quality and safety of the service operate. One way to do this is for telecare providers to apply to become certified against the Quality Standards Framework' _ overseen by TEC Quality, which has recently been accredited by the UK Accreditation Service (UKAS): The Quality Standards Framework sets out ten quality standards and four service delivery modules, together with outcomes, against which providers are audited. This includes delivery module specifically for telecare monitoring that outlines minimum expectations For example; a locally agreed process for passing calls to the emergency services and monitoring a service user's welfare when a call has been passed to a responder such as the ambulance service?. Commissioners of telecare services have influence when agreeing contracts in setting expectations of quality and safety: For example, by specifying that providers have received accreditation against a framework of standards. Given the significant role of local authorities in contracting with telecare providers, have asked my officials to your concerns to the attention of the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS) to raise awareness of these matters and the benefits of contracting with organisations certified by standard bodies, such as TEC Quality. hope this response is helpful. Thank You for bringing these concerns to my attention: 4 A EDWARD ARGAR MP https l tecquality org uklthe-gsf-modules httpsxllir: cdn mulliscreensite comlagaZcld liilesluploadedA %Z Telecare%ZOMonitoring?20v3.3%2025th%20Febr 4ary"/202019p2df they they key bring
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 16th September 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Joan Margaret Mcindoe. The investigation concluded on the 22nd June 2020 and the conclusion was one of Natural Causes. The medical cause of death was 1a) Acute left ventricular failure; 1b) lschaemic heart disease; 1c) Coronary artery atheroma
Circumstances of the Death
Joan Margaret Mcindoe resided at 33 Mayfair Court, a retirement complex. In office hours from Monday - Friday there was an on-site manager. Out of hours there was an alarm system in operation. On 14th September 2019 at 05:39 the alarm in her flat was activated. The call centre monitoring the alarm was unsuccessful in making contact with her and the Ambulance Service was contacted. The call was categorised as a category 4 call in accordance with national policy regarding calls of this type. There was no follow up by the call centre. Her family were notified of the activation and that an ambulance had been called. At about 07:30 her family attended and found her unresponsive in the shower. A further call was placed to NWAS who responded immediately. They pronounced her dead on their arrival after carrying out an assessment. l
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Independent Statutory Resilience Body
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Improved Risk Assessment Approach
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Triennial Pandemic Exercises
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Publish Exercise Reports and Lessons
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Apply best offer principle equally in GLOS
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Post Office to engage in negotiations during HSSA appeal period
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Set deadline for HSS claims with guidance on late applications
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Clarify whether HCRS and OCS assessment processes differ
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Establish standing public body to administer future redress schemes
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Devise redress process for affected family members
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.