Stuart Robinson
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2023-0161
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 11 Jul 2023
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
11 Jul 2023
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
This inquest highlighted the significant numbers of prisoners who enter the prison system with known or undiagnosed mental health issues. Whilst ACCT 6 requires multidisciplinary attendance at review meetings, this case highlighted the need for specific attendance of an RMN or other mental health expert at any review, (Mr Robinson had repeatedly self harmed prior to committing suicide but had presented without concern at each review which had been carried out without any input from the mental health team). The prison in question now operates a local policy to ensure someone from the mental health team attends all ACCT reviews irrespective of other disciplines attending. This has enabled the prison to identify issues which may not be picked up by other professionals involved, to enable support to be put in place by way of separate care plans which has had a notable impact upon SASH in the prison.
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Ms Ainge,
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 16 May 2023 addressed to the Ministry of Justice. I am responding on behalf of His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) as Director General of Operations.
I know that you will share a copy of this response with Mr Robinson’s family, and I would first like to express my condolences for their loss. Every death in custody is a tragedy and the safety of those in our care is my absolute priority.
You have expressed concerns regarding the need for a mental health nurse or expert to attend all Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) case reviews nationally.
As you are aware, ACCT is the case management approach used to support people at risk of self-harm and suicide and is designed to meet the specific needs of the individual by providing multi-disciplinary support to design a person-centred safety support plan.
The emphasis on multi-disciplinary working ensures that any staff who can contribute to supporting the individual will be invited to be part of the ACCT case review team. Depending on the individual’s need, this may include a range of staff members from across the prison such as key workers, chaplaincy, substance misuse, psychology, and wing staff, as well as mental health professionals.
The policy requires that healthcare staff are always invited to attend, or otherwise contribute, to the first case review, allowing the case review team to consider the need for any additional mental health support for the individual, including referral to the mental health team, and their attendance at subsequent case reviews. This ensures that attendance is driven by the needs of the individual, and staff are appropriately deployed where they can offer the most support.
Thank you again for bringing your concerns to my attention. I trust that this response provides assurance that action is being taken to address this matter.
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 16 May 2023 addressed to the Ministry of Justice. I am responding on behalf of His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) as Director General of Operations.
I know that you will share a copy of this response with Mr Robinson’s family, and I would first like to express my condolences for their loss. Every death in custody is a tragedy and the safety of those in our care is my absolute priority.
You have expressed concerns regarding the need for a mental health nurse or expert to attend all Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) case reviews nationally.
As you are aware, ACCT is the case management approach used to support people at risk of self-harm and suicide and is designed to meet the specific needs of the individual by providing multi-disciplinary support to design a person-centred safety support plan.
The emphasis on multi-disciplinary working ensures that any staff who can contribute to supporting the individual will be invited to be part of the ACCT case review team. Depending on the individual’s need, this may include a range of staff members from across the prison such as key workers, chaplaincy, substance misuse, psychology, and wing staff, as well as mental health professionals.
The policy requires that healthcare staff are always invited to attend, or otherwise contribute, to the first case review, allowing the case review team to consider the need for any additional mental health support for the individual, including referral to the mental health team, and their attendance at subsequent case reviews. This ensures that attendance is driven by the needs of the individual, and staff are appropriately deployed where they can offer the most support.
Thank you again for bringing your concerns to my attention. I trust that this response provides assurance that action is being taken to address this matter.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 05 May 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Stuart Michael ROBINSON aged 20. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 15 May 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Stuart Michael Robinson arrived at HMP Altcourse on 3rd March 2021 after receiving a 26 week sentence for breach of license. He was due to be released on 1st June 2021. He arrived with a history of attempted suicide and self-harm. On the 8th April, a ACCT book was opened following the interception of a letter detailing Mr Robinson's intention of suicide. Subsequently he was put under a regime of 5 observations an hour and 2 meaningful conversations per day. On the 9th April he underwent a mental health assessment and the first ACCT case review reduced the number of hourly observations to 3, with the number of meaningful conversations remaining at 2 per day. A care plan was put in place as part of this first case review. On the 14th April at a second case review, the observations were removed entirely, however the meaningful conversations remained at 2 per day. On the evening of 18th April Mr Robinson self-harmed, leading to hourly observations being reinstated. This led to the 3rd case review being brought forward to the 19th April. Hourly checks were once again removed and Mr Robinson continued to have 2 meaningful conversations. On 23rd April Mr Robinson self-harmed again, leading to the fourth case review being brought forward. On this same date Mr Robinson's podmate was released from prison and Mr Robinson was therefore alone in his cell. Mr Robinson was last seen at 7 pm on the 24th April. In the early hours of 25th April between approximately 12 am and 1 am, Mr Robinson applied a ligature ultimately resulting in his death by suicide. His body was discovered at 5am and a code blue was called. Medical staff attended the scene but it was clear that Mr Robinson was incapable of resuscitation. Mr Robinson was declared dead at 5:16 am.
Circumstances of the Death
5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) This inquest highlighted the significant numbers of prisoners who enter the prison system with known or undiagnosed mental health issues. Whilst ACCT 6 requires multidisciplinary attendance at review meetings, this case highlighted the need for specific attendance of an RMN or other mental health expert at any review, (Mr Robinson had repeatedly self harmed prior to committing suicide but had presented without concern at each review which had been carried out without any input from the mental health team). The prison in question now operates a local policy to ensure someone from the mental health team attends all ACCT reviews irrespective of other disciplines attending. This has enabled the prison to identify issues which may not be picked up by other professionals involved, to enable support to be put in place by way of separate care plans which has had a notable impact upon SASH in the prison.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.