REDACTED

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2019-0397
Date of Report 22 November 2019
Coroner Andrew Cox
Response Deadline est. 26 July 2024
No published response · Over 2 years old
Response Status
Responses 0 of 1
56-Day Deadline 26 Jul 2024
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner's Concerns
The appropriateness of the police response to the report of as a missing person on 29 April was considered by the IOPC. In evidence at the inquest, I heard from their -who concluded that there had been an opportunity to raise the risk to high at an earlier stage. He did note, however, that the matter had ostensibly been dealt with as a high-risk response for some time prior to its re-categorisation at that level. I was not able to conclude that the delay in raising the level of risk to high had been causative of the death as it was not known at what time had, in fact, hanged himself. It had to be noted that there was a period of approximately eight hours before he was first reported to police as a missing person. It was accepted in evidence that the decision as to the appropriate level of risk was essentially a "judgement call" on the part of the individual officer. It was further accepted that there would be occasions when these judgements would be very finely balanced. It was not felt that there had been any failure to follow practice or protocol at a local level. It was noted, however, that it would be sensible to share the salient facts with you in order that there could be a proper review of the guidance contained within the relevant College of Policing APP upon which the police officers relied. It was recognised that if the guidance could be clearer this may assist different officers from achieving a greater level of consistency in decision-making when faced with the same, complex set of facts. Information Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Action Should Be Taken
Would you please consider whether it would be appropriate to review the Missing Person APP MP101 in the light of the facts set out above. If so, would you please let me know whether or not you feel it appropriate to issue amended guidance.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 3 May 2018, an inquest was opened into the death of who died on 30 April 2018. The inquest culminated in a final hearing on 20 November 2019 with a conclusion being recorded of suicide. The cause of death identified at post-mortem was: 1A) hanging
Circumstances of the Death
On 4 April 2018, was interviewed by Devon and Cornwall police in relation to allegations . He denied all the allegations. On 18 April 2018, -reported her husband as a missing person. She also received a text message from him indicating that she would be "better off without him." On 19 April 2018, was detained by police under section 136 of the Mental Health Act and taken to a place of safety. A Mental Health Act examination was conducted following which was discharged with advice to contact his GP. On 29 April 2018, at approximately 10:00 AM, told his wife that he was going to a local supermarket to buy milk. He did not return. At 18:00 hours,
- reported to police that her husband was missing. An initial risk ent assessed the level of risk at medium. Sergeant (now Inspector) came on duty at 21 :30 hours. His initial review of the log caused him to
- Information Classification: CONFIDENTIAL express concern that the appropriate level of risk was high. He asked for a review from the duty Inspector, Inspector-A review was conducted shortly thereafter, and the level of risk was maintained at medium. A number of additional enquiries, however, were put in train, for example, tasking an officer check whether there was milk at the property and, additionally, insisting upon review of CCTV footage at the local supermarket. The latter enquiry revealed that had not been to the supermarket but instead had misled his wife. At approximately 02:00 hours on 30 April, the level of risk was re-assessed as high. A helicopter was tasked to look for (and another missing person) and attempts were made to triangulate his position using his phone. was subsequently found hanged in a secluded area of woodland later that morning.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Independent Statutory Resilience Body
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Improved Risk Assessment Approach
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Triennial Pandemic Exercises
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Publish Exercise Reports and Lessons
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Apply best offer principle equally in GLOS
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Post Office to engage in negotiations during HSSA appeal period
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Set deadline for HSS claims with guidance on late applications
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Clarify whether HCRS and OCS assessment processes differ
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Establish standing public body to administer future redress schemes
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Devise redress process for affected family members
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.