John Follon

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2024-0547
Date of Report 14 October 2024
Coroner Gaynor Kynaston
Response Deadline ✓ from report 8 December 2024
All 1 response received · Deadline: 8 Dec 2024
Response Status
Responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 8 Dec 2024
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner’s Concerns
(1) Changes to the alarm system have been made following Mr Follon’s death such as making the alarm louder and ensuring a yellow ribbon appears and remains at the top of the monitoring screen until the alarm is reactivated. However, it is still possible for a member of staff to silence the alarm without checking on the patient and the alarm will remain silent until it is physically reactivated by a member of staff.

(2) Currently when the alarm is triggered, during the day shift, staff are required to check on the patient prior to the alarm being silenced, during a night shift staff are permitted to silence the alarm prior to checking the patient to reduce noise to a minimum while patients are sleeping. The latter was the position in the instant case when Mr Follon’s lead became detached.

(3) The monitors are not checked constantly or even every hour but are checked twice during each shift. During a busy night shift or during handover, if the person silencing the alarm does not attend to the patient at the time the alarm sounds and if the amber ribbon, which now appears on the monitor alerting staff to a “lead off” scenario, goes unnoticed, the risk that a patient will not be monitored for a significant period of time remains.

Phone/Ffôn Fax/Ffacs (4) During a night shift, the circumstances in which Mr Follon died remain the same notwithstanding changes to nursing practice and the alarm system have been made. The risk of a patient not being monitored for a significant period of time remains and could give rise to a death in similar circumstances in the future.
Responses
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
17 Oct 2024
Response received
View full response
Dear Ms Kynaston Thank you for your letter received via email received 17 October 2024 in which you have shared the Regulation 28 with associated actions for improvement following the inquest into the sad death of Mr John Austin Follon. note that it is your view that some actions could be taken by the Health Board to minimise the risk of future deaths in similar circumstances. In addition, it is noted that the cause of the Cardiac arrest cannot be established and it is not possible to determine whether the lack of monitoring more than minimally contributed to this gentleman's death, the Health Board accepts that this is unsatisfactory for the family and did not assist the inquest process. The matters of concerns raised are outlined: (1) Changes to the alarm system have been made following Mr Follon's death such as making the alarm louder and ensuring yellow ribbon appears and remains at the top of the monitoring screen until the alarm is reactivated_ However, it is still possible for a member of staff to silence the alarm without checking on the patient and the alarm will remain silent until it is physically reactivated by & member of staff: In the inquest it was acknowledged by the CVUHB (Cardiff and Vale University Health Board) representative that these measures taken would not in isolation prevent a reoccurrence of this event. It is hoped that the additional measures taken as outlined in this response will provide some further reassurance dsability Bwrdd {echyd Pnifysgol Caerdydd &r Fro Yw @w gweithredol Bwyrdd lechyd Ueol Pnfysgol Caerdydd a"r Fro confident Cardifl and Vale Unlverslly Health Board the operallanal name 0l ^ ediff and Vale Unlversily Local Health Board EMpLoVER Coesawrir D+TUd Oheuigeln %n Grii8eg nOu Saosnag Sicow= pyodwn cyto/nrotu _ ct Ktakh deris ianth: Hlifyod gohetuyn Gymraug yn CrBU inihyw Oed Boam We come conesponoenca Wolsh 5 Engtsh, WYa ensure Inel 16 Kol communi816 HA crorom Janguago Cotnntdonnca Welth wR not load t0 dala}

(2) Currently when the alarm is triggered, during the shift; staff are required to check on the patient prior to the alarm being silenced, night shift staff are permitted to silence the alarm prior to checking the patient to reduce noise to a minimum while_patients are sleeping: The latter was the position in the instant case when Mr Follon's lead became detached, We would like to advise that there is no formal permission given to staff to silence the alarm before reviewing the patient at any time of day or night Staff will often silence the alarm prior to reviewing the patient to reduce noise levels for the comfort of all patients however the issue that arose in this situation was that the alarm was silenced but the cause of the alarm was not clarified and Mr Follon was not reviewed as would have been expected in these circumstances. (3) The monitors are not checked constantly Or even every hour but are checked twice during each shift. During a busy night shift or during handover, if the person silencing the alarm does not attend to the patient at the time the alarm sounds and if the amber ribbon, which now appears on the monitor alerting staff to a "lead off' scenario, goes unnoticed, the risk that a patient will not be monitored for a significant period of time remains_ It may be helpful to clarify the monitors are observed regularly throughout the shifts but there is a checklist in place to review alarm settings and confirmation that alarms are on: The monitors are also checked outside of this process (4) During a night shift, the circumstances in which Mr Follon died remain the same notwithstanding changes to nursing practice and the alarm system have been made: The risk of a patient not being monitored for a significant period of time remains and could give rise to a death in similar circumstances in the future. On review it was acknowledged that these circumstances could equally apply to day shift and we fully acknowledge the above. However, following number of meetings with our CVUHB clinical engineering department and the monitor manufacturer Phillips following receipt of the regulation 28 further amendments have been made to the system to mitigate the risk of this incident happening again. These actions include: There are two alarm reminder (re-alarm) settings; available for "All inop alarms' and "Yellow red alarms"_ Once set, this will cause a silenced alarm to reactivate after 2 mins should alarm condition not be resolved. Yellow red alarms already have the re-alarm setting on in CVUHB. Our immediate action after the incident was to make the ECG leads off Lead set unplugged alarms a yellow alarm. This ensures staff can prioritise confirmed red alarm conditions, for example Cardiac arrest alarms We have ensured that staff are reminded again to deal with a lead off scenario should the alarm be acknowledged but the issue persists. disability Bwrdd Jechyd Pnfysgol Caerdydd ar Fro VW enw gweihredo Bwyrdd Iecnyd Ueol Pritysgol Caerdydd a' Fro confident Cardift and Vale Unlversiny Health Board th€ operatlenal name 0f Cardiff and vale Universiy Health Boand Ehployer coosort Bwrdd chobloolh Yn Gymr69 neu Saasneq Sicruw byddwn Yn €xorncabu_ chiyn Bih 00ws Ni fydd gohabu yn Gymraeg yn unchry oedi The Baard n 0 Ioma $ coitosocncanca Welsh Engush Wo ril' onsure thet m8 Kl communkalo T6 @han langu8ge CoTesconnent5 Welsh Wk nol Iaad aclay day during the Local

The alarm configuration for telemetry units is managed by the central station. The changes to these have been completed within the Cardiothoracic areas on 22 November 2024 by Phillips and the CVUHB Clinical Engineering team: Now that this work is complete, the next stage is to adjust the monitor configurations to match the central station and telemetry configuration; Clinical Engineering will visit the clinical areas to install these configurations onto the monitors. This will require a phased approach to maintain patient safety. All clinical wards in the Cardiothoracic Directorate will be complete by the assigned deadline of 8 December 2024. The subsequent steps after resolving the immediate Regulation 28 actions is to assess and evaluate the configurations across all patient monitoring in CVUHB. In the first instance this will provide us with a more robust understanding of the current configurations Secondly, we can decide if the changes implemented in the Cardiothoracic areas (yellow priority of leads offlunplugged, and re-alarm for the same) are applicable cross the Health Board. The Directors of Nursing have been asked by the Executive Nurse Director to scope and consider this regulation 28 in light of their own clinical areas and this work will be monitored via the Directors of Nursing forum. It is also our intention to share this information through the Inquest and HOPE (Head of Patient Experience) networks as this could be beneficial across Wales. hope that this information is helpful and offers the assurance you are seeking regarding the improvements instigated to reduce the risk that patients in similar circumstances to Mr Follon will not have the alarm silenced without being checked and reviewed
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 5 December 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of John Austin FOLLON . The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 08/10/2024 . The conclusion of the inquest was Mr John Follon, a 78year old gentleman was admitted to hospital from the GP surgery having suffered a MI. He underwent successful stenting to remove the blockage. Four days later, he suffered a cardiac arrest from which he did not recover. Prior to the cardiac event, a lead from the monitor had become disconnected, the alarm was silenced by a staff member who did not then check on Mr Follon leading to a period of an hour and three quarters during which he was not monitored. The cause of the cardiac arrest cannot be established and it is not possible to determine whether the lack of monitoring more than minimally contributed to his death.. 1a Inferior ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Phone/Ffôn Fax/Ffacs 1b 1c II Hypertension, Chronic Smoker
Circumstances of the Death
Mr John Follon, a 78 year old gentleman attended his GP surgery with chest pains and breathlessness on 17 Nov 2022. Following an ECG, which showed he had suffered an inferior myocardial infarction, he was transported by emergency ambulance from the surgery directly to the catheter laboratory at The University Hospital of Wales where he underwent a stenting procedure to unblock the right coronary artery. He made good progress following the procedure to the point of independently caring for himself on the ward. However, the monitor showed intermittent 1st degree and complete heart block and a decision on whether he required a permanent pacemaker depended upon the extent of his recovery. While awaiting this decision, he was being monitored on CCU by telemetry. On 21 Nov 2022 at 06:57, one of the leads became disconnected triggering an alarm at the nurses station which was acknowledged at 07:04 and silenced by a staff member. The evidence suggests that person did not check on Mr Follon at that time. Mr Follon was last spoken to on or around 07:30hours before being found unresponsive in a state of cardiac arrest in his bed at 08:45hrs. Resuscitation was commenced, however, it was not successful and he passed away at 09:06. Neither the cause nor time of the cardiac arrest can be established as he there was no monitoring during the period from when the lead became detached until his death.
Copies Sent To
Chief Executive Officer, , Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Risk-based visitor restrictions for radicalising prisoners
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unsupervised High-Risk Residents

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.