Pamela Gressman

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2016-wp25347
Date of Report 1 August 2016
Coroner Andrew Tweddle
Response Deadline est. 26 September 2016
All 1 response received · Deadline: 26 Sep 2016
Response Status
Responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 26 Sep 2016
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner’s Concerns
Whilst it is clear that considerable attention was given to the deceased’s mental health, insufficient consideration or no consideration was given to any physical effects which might ensue from her ingesting the foreign bodies that she reported she had and which led to her period of hospitalisation. Thus little or no thought was given to any link between such items and her presentation with abdominal pain in January 2016. The absence of a clear treatment and observation plan in such circumstances could lead to a risk of similar fatalities in the future.
Responses
Tees Esk amd Water Valleys NHS Trust
Response received (text not yet extracted)
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 9th March 2016 I commenced an investigation into the death of Pamela Gressman, 65 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 1st August 2016. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative-The result of ingesting a number of foreign bodies, one or more of which led to a perforation of the colon. The medical cause of death was; 1a) Hospital Acquired Pneumonia, 1b) Colonic Perforation, 1c) Ingested Foreign Body, 2) Depression, Laparotomy with Sigmoid Colectomy & Formation of Stoma, Bleeding Duodenal Ulcer, Malnutrition, Diet Controlled Diabetes, Previous Stroke, Ischaemic Heart Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Circumstances of the Death
The deceased at some time ingested a series of foreign bodies which were found internally during an operation. She had been admitted as a voluntary patient to West Park Hospital, Darlington. It is unknown when the items which were found within her during the operation were ingested. It is not known whether she had actually ingested all or any of the items which she said she had ingested which led to her being admitted to hospital in January 2016. She reported abdominal pains which were not associated to be linked with the swallowing of foreign bodies. The Consultant Psychiatrist did not believe that she had swallowed foreign bodies during the period of admission to the hospital and that she probably swallowed various items prior to admission. During her period of admission there is no documented enquiry having been made as to how physically well she was in relation to the items which she had allegedly swallowed nor was any consideration given to discussing with her whether such items had been passed naturally from her body nor was any system in place to be able to monitor if and when any foreign bodies were excreted from her body. It is possible that such foreign bodies within her system could remain benign for a period but likewise could move and cause serious harm or become life threatening. There is nothing to suggest that this important matter was given any significant consideration by those responsible for her care.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Service change continuity plans
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Continuing responsibility for care
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Follow up of patients
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care and discharge planning

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.