Mavis Lawrence

PFD Report Partially Responded Ref: 2020-0191
Date of Report 30 September 2020
Coroner Margaret Jones
Response Deadline ✓ from report 27 November 2020
1 of 3 responded · Over 2 years old
Response Status
Responses 1 of 3
56-Day Deadline 27 Nov 2020
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner’s Concerns
The matters that are raised in the safeguarding report:- (1)Nursing notes evidence that pressure areas (sacrum/ buttock/hips) were not checked between 3.12.18 and 11.12.18. Wounds to the sacrum and left hip were documented on the 16.12.18 in nursing notes. (2)No wound treatment assessment charts after the 18.12.18 to document deterioration of pressure areas.

(3)Nursing notes in December 2018 did not portray a clear story of positioning and changes to the ulcers.

(4) The pressure mattress had been turned off on the 22.1.19 (5)No record of last visit by district nurses on the 27.1.19 (6) There was no evidence that band 4 nurse escalated the seriousness of the situation.

(7) There was no evidence that the deceased had been provided with any pain relief and the GP had not been sufficiently involved. .

(8) District nurses had not involved Tissue Viability Nurses.
Responses
Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
25 Nov 2020
Response received
View full response
Dear Ms Jones

Re: Mavis May Lawrence (deceased) Report to prevent Future Deaths

Thank you for your letter dated 1st October 2020, reporting matters to us, in accordance with Regulation 28 and 29 of the Coroner’s (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

Following discussions within the teams involved, I am now in a position to respond to your specific concerns, whereby you stated you heard at the inquest during the course of the evidence:

I am sorry that a complete set of records was not made available to you at the point of the inquest. We note, as part of your inquest conclusion and subsequent concerns outlined in your Regulation 28 report, that unfortunately you did not have access to the My Care File, which contains the records held at a patient’s home or place of residence. Our response is made on the basis of our review of the relevant MPFT care records.

We have responded to each of the concerns raised and identified some actions, which are in the action plan below for your information.

(1) Nursing notes evidence that pressure areas (sacrum/ buttock/hips) were not checked between 3.12.18 and 11.12.18. Wounds to the sacrum and left hip were documented on the 16.12.18 in nursing notes. We have identified a number of actions aimed at improving completeness of our documentation; including the provision of additional training and a programme of audits, to ensure improvements are made. (Please see action plan below actions 1 & 2 & 4c).

(2) No wound treatment assessment charts after the 18.12.18 to document deterioration of pressure areas. There is evidence in the deceased’s records that wound assessments were undertaken after the
18.12.2018. Wound assessments were completed on the 01.01.2019 and on the 27.01.2019 clearly documenting the condition and anatomical location of the wounds. The MPFT guidance is that wound assessments need to be carried out and documented on a fortnightly basis. If the wounds deteriorate before the next fortnightly review, a wound assessment will be completed prior to that date. Records show that in between the regular wound assessments there were regular summaries of the condition of the wounds. Up until the date of admission to hospital the records

2

state that the wounds to the sacral and right hip area were improving, granulating (healing) or that there were no concerns to raise. The assistant practitioner (band 4 nurse from the district nursing team) has documented that there may be a new non blanching area to the right hip. The assistant practitioner (band 4 nurse from the district nursing team) recorded in the nursing notes that “the family has been advised of Mavis’s presentation and requirements” on the last wound assessment on the 27.01.2019.

(3) Nursing notes in December 2018 did not portray a clear story of positioning and changes to the ulcers. Please see response above. (4) The pressure mattress had been turned off on the 22.1.19 The Residential Home is responsible for ensuring appropriate use of the equipment. Our records show that during a routine visit on 22.1.19 the district nurse noticed that the pressure mattress had been turned off, and took immediate action and turned it back on.

(5) No record of last visit by district nurses on the 27.1.19 When the patient is cared for in a residential home, the carers are expected to carry out regular skin checks as they are tending to the patient, on a regular basis. The process in place requires that the care staff raise concerns to the district nurses as and when required. There is evidence in the care records that MPFT staff did request the Residential Home staff contact MPFT district nursing staff if they had any concerns. There is evidence of a wound assessment table having been completed by the assistant practitioner (band 4 nurse from the district nursing team) on
27.1.19, in the My Care File when the assistant practitioner (band 4 nurse from the district nursing team) was requested by the Residential home care staff to complete an assessment.

(6) There was no evidence that band 4 nurse escalated the seriousness of the situation. There is evidence in the records that the band 4 nurse escalated this appropriately and notified the nurse in charge of the district nurse team, as well as the tissue viability team, on Sunday 27th January 2019.

(7) There was no evidence that the deceased had been provided with any pain relief and the GP had not been sufficiently involved. Records show that pain assessments were done at each wound assessment but they do not document pain management in a way that we would expect. It is expected practice that any deterioration in the patient’s condition would be addressed with the appropriate intervention by the relevant practitioner, for example, the General Practitioner. We have identified an action to improve our processes to ensure that GPs are sufficiently involved and in addition to strengthen documentation associated with pain management (Please see action plan below - actions 3 & 4a, 4b, 4c & 7.)

(8) District nurses had not involved Tissue Viability Nurses. The district nurses and assistant practitioner band 4 assistant practitioners are skilled in managing wounds; including pressure ulcers.

The wounds were documented to be healing prior to the 27th January 2019. The assistant practitioner (band 4 nurse from the district nursing team) was at the Residential Home reviewing other patients when the Residential Home staff requested an assessment be completed by her on that day.

In line with our Trust policy for pressure ulcer prevention and management, the practice is that the district nurses will refer to the tissue viability team when there is deterioration in a wound. Once the assistant practitioner (band 4 nurse from the district nursing team) identified (on assessment) that the wounds were deteriorating they followed the correct process of incident reporting, and notified

3

the nurse in charge of the district nurse team, as well as the tissue viability team, on Sunday 27th January 2019.

MPFT has identified the following actions to improve processes.

Action Lead Leek District nursing Team Completion Date

District nursing teams and Home First Teams Trust Wide Completion Date Point 1 –
1.Provision of additional training in wound care documentation utilising the YouTube training link developed by MPFT Tissue Viability Team (Wound assessment training) Operational Lead for Leek district nursing team
31.01.2021 Each operational lead to check training register and to ensure all staff have undertaken the update training
31.01.2021 Point 1 –
2.An audit of nursing documentation including pressure ulcer management

Operational Leads

Professional Lead & Tissue Viability Lead
30.11.2020

Check audit and compile report for senior management Develop an audit tool for all community/district nursing teams and a pressure ulcer audit will take place Trust wide
28.02.2021 Point 7 –
3.To raise awareness of the need to involve the GP in the ongoing management of patient care as part of the multidisciplinary team Clinical Lead & District Nursing Commenced by 30.11.2020 To raise awareness of the need to involve the GP in the ongoing management of patient care as part of the multidisciplinary team Commenced by
30.11.2020 Point 7 – 4a. Documentation will be improved. The pain assessment tool has been reviewed and updated; a relaunch with all clinical staff took place in August
2020.

4b. The patient care plan template to be updated to incorporate the pain assessment tool.

Professional Lead for Community Nursing

Tissue Viability Clinical Lead

Professional Lead for Community
31.10.2020 The audit tool will identify if this process has been embedded
31.10.2020

31.12.2020

28.02.2021

4

4c. An audit will take place to ensure the pain assessment process is embedded in clinical practice

Nursing Tissue Viability Clinical Lead Point 1 & Point 7
5. A new Community Nursing Assessment document has been introduced to document a holistic assessment for patients referred into the District Nursing service to identify needs based on the activities of daily living model.

Completed
6. Multidisciplinary team to share best practice and learning from incidents across all clinical teams via a monthly newsletter following each Pressure Ulcer Review Group and Tissue Viability Steering Group meeting for discussion at team huddles Tissue Viability Clinical Lead
04.11.2020 Multidisciplinary team sharing best practice and learning from incidents Across all clinical teams A monthly newsletter following each Pressure Ulcer Review Group and Tissue Viability Steering Group meeting
04.11.2020

In line with our governance processes we will share the learning from the Regulation 28 and the actions identified will be monitored, to ensure the action plan is fully completed.

I hope this response helps to address your concerns. However if you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 28/05/2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mavis May Lawrence. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 30th September 2020. The conclusion of the inquest was:- “The deceased died from natural causes exacerbated by infected pressure sores.” The deceased was 87 years of age and suffered with severe dementia. She required full nursing care. She had been resident at Beechdene Residential Home, Leek since September 2018. She had been seen regularly by District Nursing teams to assess and treat her pressure areas but tissue viability nurses were not involved. Preventative measures including pressure relieving equipment were in place; however nursing notes evidenced gaps in pressure care between 3rd December 2018 and the 27th January 2019 when she was admitted to the Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent. She was dehydrated and found to have deep ungradable pressure sores and an abscess on her buttock. She was discharged to Goldenhill Nursing Home, Heathside Lane, Stoke on Trent on the 13th February 2019 for end of life care where she died on the 28th February 2019. The cause of death was given as:- 1a. Bronchopneumonia. 1b. Immobility. 1c. Alzheimer’s dementia.
2. Old age and infected pressure ulcers.
Circumstances of the Death
See above
-
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Communication strategy for patients and families
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Patient dignity and privacy
Visiting Restrictions Guidance
COVID-19 Inquiry
Patient dignity and privacy
Deceased treated with same dignity as patients
Fuller Inquiry
Patient dignity and privacy
No deceased left out of fridges overnight
Fuller Inquiry
Patient dignity and privacy
Review policies on mortuary access
Fuller Inquiry
Patient dignity and privacy
CCTV in mortuary including post-mortem room
Fuller Inquiry
Patient dignity and privacy
NHS trusts commission specialist security review
Fuller Inquiry
Patient dignity and privacy
Deceased included in safeguarding training and policy
Fuller Inquiry
Patient dignity and privacy
CCTV in all NHS mortuaries
Fuller Inquiry
Patient dignity and privacy
Chief Nurse responsibility for deceased safeguarding
Fuller Inquiry
Patient dignity and privacy

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.