Aimee Varney
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2014-0249
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 28 Jul 2014
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
28 Jul 2014
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
1. That the NICE Guidelines for referring a patient with suspected epilepsy to a Specialist Tertiary Centre were not followed.
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Mr Smith Inquest touching the death of Aimee Sarah VARNEY Inquest held on 19th May 2014 at Coroner's Court; Ampthill Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report; dated 2nd June 2014,in response to the death of Aimee Varney: The Trust has considered the following matter of concern:
1) That the NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) Guidelines for referring patient with suspected epilepsy to specialist tertiary centre were not followed_ The Medical Director is responsible for ensuring every new NICE guideline is allocated to the relevant speciality. The appropriate Clinical Audit and Effectiveness Committee (CAEC) Lead, the Finance and the Clinical Director all receive copies for discussion and dissemination. As for all NHS bodies there are occasions where the hospital cannot immediately comply with NICE guidance_ This can be due to resources and requires negotiation with our commissioners to fund, for example, high value new drug therapies_ The allocations are recorded on central database managed by the Clinical Quality Department also record whether the relevant speciality has declared the guideline to be non-applicable, applicable and implemented or applicable but the Trust is non-compliant: A Risk Register is kept of all guidelines the Trust is not able to immediately comply with; this is regularly monitored to ensure the relevant changes are made as soon as possible. Individual_Clinicians have ready access to the relevant NICE guidelines via the Hospitals Intranet: can also gain access via the NICE website WWW nice Org_uk/quidance ooenge Qu": Luton and Dunstable University Hospital "c V Pitli:u: Pleliu N- Fcunja QX NH JiVel s18 They They Toa [
However it must be emphasised that are guidelines, not tramlines that the treating clinician must rigidly follow. NICE state health and social care professionals are actively encouraged to follow our recommendations to help them deliver highest quality care_ Of course, our recommendations are not intended to replace the professional expertise and clinical judgement of health professionals, as they discuss treatment options with their patients_ There will be individual patients where the treating clinician uses their own judgement and does not follow the absolute guidance_ In this particular case the expert report was prepared by a clinician with special interest in epilepsy, from specialist centre_ Their report may not reflect what is considered acceptable practice by general neurologist; with general neurology practice, that is managing patient with epilepsy: For this reason we are commissioning a further report, from an independent general neurologist; to get assurance that the individual clinician's practice did not fall outside the threshold of reasonable practice_ hope you are reassured that the Trust has appropriate systems for the logging and disseminating of NICE Guidelines
1) That the NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) Guidelines for referring patient with suspected epilepsy to specialist tertiary centre were not followed_ The Medical Director is responsible for ensuring every new NICE guideline is allocated to the relevant speciality. The appropriate Clinical Audit and Effectiveness Committee (CAEC) Lead, the Finance and the Clinical Director all receive copies for discussion and dissemination. As for all NHS bodies there are occasions where the hospital cannot immediately comply with NICE guidance_ This can be due to resources and requires negotiation with our commissioners to fund, for example, high value new drug therapies_ The allocations are recorded on central database managed by the Clinical Quality Department also record whether the relevant speciality has declared the guideline to be non-applicable, applicable and implemented or applicable but the Trust is non-compliant: A Risk Register is kept of all guidelines the Trust is not able to immediately comply with; this is regularly monitored to ensure the relevant changes are made as soon as possible. Individual_Clinicians have ready access to the relevant NICE guidelines via the Hospitals Intranet: can also gain access via the NICE website WWW nice Org_uk/quidance ooenge Qu": Luton and Dunstable University Hospital "c V Pitli:u: Pleliu N- Fcunja QX NH JiVel s18 They They Toa [
However it must be emphasised that are guidelines, not tramlines that the treating clinician must rigidly follow. NICE state health and social care professionals are actively encouraged to follow our recommendations to help them deliver highest quality care_ Of course, our recommendations are not intended to replace the professional expertise and clinical judgement of health professionals, as they discuss treatment options with their patients_ There will be individual patients where the treating clinician uses their own judgement and does not follow the absolute guidance_ In this particular case the expert report was prepared by a clinician with special interest in epilepsy, from specialist centre_ Their report may not reflect what is considered acceptable practice by general neurologist; with general neurology practice, that is managing patient with epilepsy: For this reason we are commissioning a further report, from an independent general neurologist; to get assurance that the individual clinician's practice did not fall outside the threshold of reasonable practice_ hope you are reassured that the Trust has appropriate systems for the logging and disseminating of NICE Guidelines
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 19th June 2013 I commenced an Investigation into the death of Aimee Sarah VARNEY aged 21 years. The Investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 19th May 2014. The Conclusion of the Inquest was that between January 2012 and April 2013 the deceased was undergoing investigation for epilepsy at the Luton & Dunstable Hospital. She died following a seizure on 16th June 2014 at her home address
Dunstable, Bedfordshire. The medical cause of death being:
I (a) Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy
Dunstable, Bedfordshire. The medical cause of death being:
I (a) Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy
Circumstances of the Death
Aimee Sarah VARNEY had undergone investigations for epilepsy between January 2012 and April 2013. She was seen at the Luton & Dunstable Hospital on 22nd April 2013 following which a referral was made for her to be seen by a Specialist at the Royal Free Hospital in London.
The failure to refer her urgently, or at all, to a Specialised Unit resulted in a lost opportunity to diagnose and further treat her condition. She died following a seizure from Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy on 16th June 2013 at 22 Priory Heights, Dunstable, Bedfordshire.
The failure to refer her urgently, or at all, to a Specialised Unit resulted in a lost opportunity to diagnose and further treat her condition. She died following a seizure from Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy on 16th June 2013 at 22 Priory Heights, Dunstable, Bedfordshire.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Responsibility for monitoring delivery of standards and quality
Mid Staffs Inquiry
GP oversight of specialist care
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.