(1) The Community Mental Health Team assessed Mr Seabourne as being a man with a definite plan to kill himself which the sought to hide from professionals The CMHT referred Mr Seabourne on an urgent basis to the Assessment Team making it plain that he was making positive plans that he should be seen on the same with a view to a formal assessment to consider & voluntary admission to hospital or Crisis Support: It was stressed by CMHT that Mr Seabourne needed to be seen face to face because of day and his ability to "dissemble" and thus hide his plans to kill himself There was no written confirmation of the CMHT duty workers view and requests (2) The Assessment Team denied asked to assess Mr Seabourne and although the team member acknowledged that he had been made aware that Mr Seabourne was deliberately concealing settled plans to kill himself he took the view that the matter was not urgent and contends that he was not asked to perform an assessment The team member concerned indicated that in his judgement a request for crisis support does not require an assessment of the patient: (3) It was clear from the evidence that there was a lack of effective communication between the separate teams which comprise of Mental Health Services within the County with the Team Manager of the Assessment Team unaware of (upon the end of the 72 hour involvement with Mr Seabourne on the part of his team) whether the CMHT would become automatically involved with onward work with Home Treatment Team; It appears that there are systemic failings in terms of communication and understanding of roles ad responsibilities in respect of the patient whom everyone acknowledged was at high risk and with settled plans to kill himself. It appears from the evidence that a lack of formal communication where all details are past from team to team led to a situation where those having contact with Mr Seabourne were unaware of the real risk that he might kill himself. Had all of the concerns of the GP and original psychiatric nurse who referred Mr Seabourne been formally documented and disseminated to each of the new teams then it is likely that he would have been seen face to face and a formal assessment considering whether he should have been admitted to hospital would have been undertaken. This may well have changed the outcome in this case.