Mary Hyden

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2015-0251
Date of Report 1 July 2015
Coroner Andrew Haigh
Response Deadline est. 26 August 2015
All 1 response received · Deadline: 26 Aug 2015
Sent To
  • University Hospital North Midlands
Response Status
Responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 26 Aug 2015
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner’s Concerns
(1) At the inquest I heard helpful evidence from Consultant Neurologist. She was frank about failures in communication in 2013 and 2014 and advised me of significant changes since Cannock Hospital was transferred to the Wolverhampton Trust. However also indicated in evidence that she is working regularly 7 days a week and the day before the inquest worked 14 hours (and again this was not unusual). These do appear to be excessive hours with an increased potential for fatal errors. I should be grateful if you could look at this.
Responses
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
24 Aug 2015
Response received
View full response
Dear Mr Haigh Mary Winifred HYDEN Further to my letter dated 10 July 2015, am pleased to provide a response to your report under paragraph of Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013,addressing your concerns surrounding the death of Mrs Mary Hyden Background Mrs Hyden was referred to a neurologist in 2013 and after a CT scan was found to have a tumour on her brain. She saw the neurologist again in 2014 but still no information about the tumour was given to her or GP. It may be that at no time was curative surgery possible in any event but there could have at least been better palliation of her symptoms. She died at home on 16 February 2015. The Conclusion of the inquest was a naturally occurring intracranial tumour that was not successfully treated. Concerns During the course of the inquest H M Coroner, Mr Haigh, felt that evidence revealed matters giving rise for concern: In his opinion, matters for concern are as follows: At the inquest Mr Haigh heard helpful evidence from Consultant Neurologist: She was frank about the failures in communication in 2013 and 2014 and advised Mr Haigh of significant changes since Cannock Hospital was transferred to the Royal Wolverhampton Trust: However, also indicated in evidence that she is working regularly days a week and the before the inquest worked 14 hours (and again this was not unusual): These do appear to be excessive hours with an increased potential for fatal errors should be grateful if you could look at this ti Con Lntta & L priouciv Mng her day Tonu

Action Taken The EC Directive on Working Time for Consultants was introduced in October 1998 and from this time onwards, all consultants are covered by the entitlements afforded by the Directive. In 1998, the Central Consultants ad Specialists Committee (CCSC) of the British Medical Association and the NHS Executive negotiated a collective agreement regarding the application of the Directive for senior hospital doctors, which derogations to inflexible hourly, daily and weekly limits under regulation 21 and in their place established the right of senior hospital doctors to take compensatory rest where the limits were exceeded: These derogations were applied to ensure that continuing responsibility to patients was maintained and the necessary protection for senior hospital doctors under the directive was retained_ This essentially means that the regulations relating to night working, daily rest, weekly rest and breaks at work do not apply to career grade hospital doctor, such as Dr Summers. However, under regulation 21, are able to accrue compensatory rest for hours worked during rest breaks; this enables career grade doctors to continue to carry on their duties flexibly and professionally ensuring that they are able to maintain continuity of service Dr Summers worked under this regime and her job plan reflected the above required criteria. Essentially, she was not working outside ofthe regulations Nevertheless, understand that the Medical Director and the Clinical Director for Neurosciences have reviewed Ijob plan (July 2015) a new job plan will be effective from 1 October 2015. In her new job plan; clinical sessions will be reduced to allow her to have a better work life balance and since November 2014, Dr Summers does not travel to Cannock Hospital to undertake clinics and ward referrals and this has significantly reduced her travel requirements In addition to this, ls not currently working in isolation at the County Hospital and has the support of a second Consultant: She has also been encouraged to utilise the administrative support that is available to her: As a Neurosciences Directorate we are keen to provide the right working environment for and patient safety is very high on our priorities sincerely that this report provides H M Coroner, Mrs Haigh, with assurance that the University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust has taken the matters arising from the inquest touching upon the death of Hyden seriousl: Whilst it is understood that this failure in communication occurred prior to the merger of the University Hospital of North Staffordshire Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust; the Trust strives to provide high standard of care to all patients and am grateful to you for raising these matters on this occasion s0 that we were able to review our processes post-merger Should you wish to discuss any aspect of this report further, please do not hesitate to contact me directly:
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 23rd February 2015 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mary Winifred HYDEN, aged 88 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 23rd June 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was "A naturally occurring intracranial tumour that was not successfully treated" With the cause of her death being 1a Pulmonary Thrombo-embolism 1b Suprasellar meningioma.
Circumstances of the Death
Mrs Hyden was referred to a neurologist in 2013 and after a CT scan was found to have a tumour by her brain. She saw the neurologist again in 2014 but still no information about the tumour was given to her or her GP. It may be that at no time was curative surgery possible in any event but there could at least have been better palliation of her symptoms. She died at home on 16th February 2015.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

NI CMO Independence
COVID-19 Inquiry
Staff suitability and fitness
Non-mortuary staff accompanied in mortuary
Fuller Inquiry
Staff suitability and fitness
Criminal record checks compliance
Fuller Inquiry
Staff suitability and fitness
Mortuary Managers qualified and supported
Fuller Inquiry
Staff suitability and fitness
Mortuary Manager as full-time dedicated role
Fuller Inquiry
Staff suitability and fitness
Review policies on mortuary access
Fuller Inquiry
Staff suitability and fitness
Audit and monitor mortuary access
Fuller Inquiry
Staff suitability and fitness
Designated Individuals adequate time and resource
Fuller Inquiry
Staff suitability and fitness
Mortuary Manager professional background prerequisite
Fuller Inquiry
Staff suitability and fitness
Mortuary Manager adequate resources and support
Fuller Inquiry
Staff suitability and fitness

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.