Barry Pike

PFD Report Unknown
Date of Report 19 August 2015
Coroner Andrew Cox
Response Deadline est. 14 October 2015
No published response · Over 2 years old
Response Status
Responses 0
56-Day Deadline 14 Oct 2015
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner's Concerns AI summary
The specific matters of concern are detailed in an external report by Dr Stephen Hoole, which was not provided here.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken immediately to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action: In particular, believe the revised algorithm for 'dealing with patients in the Emergency Department who_present with acute coronary syndrome should again be reviewed in light of the findings Report:
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 29 July 2014 commenced an investigation into the death of Barry Gordon Pike The investigation is due to conclude with an Inquest that has been listed to be heard on 12 October 2015. The medical cause of death from the Post Mortem Report is: (a) Hypoxic Encephalopathy; (b) Acute Cardiac Failure; 1 (c) Coronary Artery Atheroma
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Pike was 57 years of age. He was seen in the Emergency Department of Derriford Hospital on Julv2014 complaining of chest pains. He was triaged and then reviewed by a Junior who felt that Mr Pike was suffering from reflux: It is not clear from the evidence whether Mr Pike was the subject ofa Senior review, but in any event; he was discharged from Hospital later that afternoon: It appears as though the results of blood sent for testing at the of Mr Pike's initial triage had not been reviewed: This revealed a raised Troponin level. Mr Pike died suddenly 10 days later: Mr Pike's death has been reviewed in a Root Cause Analysis Investigation Report. That reveals a number of care and service delivery problems Included in the Root Cause Analysis is that the Emergency Department Acute Coronary Sydrome Algorithm recommended patients with intermediate risk of major acute coronary event to be discharged for GP follow up. Subsequent to this incident that algorithm has been reviewed. As part of the Inquest process, the revised algorithm has been considered by an independent expert; A copy of his Report is enclosed: Of concern is that believes ine Tevised algoritnm is not an improvement on the original document and still requires further clarity and detail to avoid confusion and mismanagement of acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to Derriford A & E Department

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.