Charles Rayner

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2015-0367
Date of Report 1 October 2015
Coroner Crispin Oliver
Response Deadline est. 26 November 2015
No published response · Over 2 years old
Response Status
Responses 0 of 1
56-Day Deadline 26 Nov 2015
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner's Concerns
In the circumstances it is my statutory duty t0 report to you: 1)The crossover point between the Otter Trust and access road t0 the moors, traveling West_does not havea slip roadldeceleration lane for traliic travelling_west such thatto the The from them The him The cany out the tum it is necessary t0 reduce speed to a virtual standstll in the outside lane
2) There is no prohibition on a rght tum by way of appropriate signage:
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On g" April 2015 ( commenced an investigation into death of Charles Emest Rayner, bom 10* July 1952. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 300 of September 2015. conclusion of the inquest was that Mr Rayner died of multiple traumatic injuries resulting a road crash traffic collision on the A66 trunk road in County Durham; West of Bowes near the Otter Trust tumoff on the 6th of April 2015. At about 10.00 a.m He was overtaking vehicles on his motorcycle when he collided with a vehicle and trailer tuming right at the intersection where there was no right tum slipway: The conclusion was that of accidental death:
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Rayner was travelling on his motor cycle in a westerly direction on a duel carageway section of the A66 past Bowes and heading towards the Otters Trust turnolf. At the time of the collision he was probably travelling at 86 miles per hour in a 70 miles per hour Iimit while overtaking in the outside lane The motor cycle was in proper working order and he was properly equipped and in all other respects acting lawfully: He may have had difiiculty in seeing the brake and indicator waming lights on the vehicle and trailer he collided with as a result of the combination of sunlight reflecting off and the effect of his motorcycle sun visor; but it was reasonable for him to have been using this. The vehicle and trailer he collided with were also travelling in a westerly direction on the A6S when the driver manoeuvred t0 tum right into the central reservation intending t0 enter the moors via a small access road, this entrance being off the eastbound caniageway opposite the Otters Trust tumoff. driver of the vehicle and trailer was manoeuvring iawfully but it was necessary for t0 reduce his speed to near standstill for the manoeuvre to be completed: This was done in the outside lane because there is nO slip roadldeceleration lane. Mr Rayner; travelling in the outside lane, was unable to take avoiding action because of vehicles in the inside lane: collision ensued resulting in his death:
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.