Ozan Allen
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2019-0197
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 10 Oct 2019
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
10 Oct 2019
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’S Concerns
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. (1) The junction is a busy crossroads involving multiple traffic lanes with filters, segregated cycle lanes and multiple pedestrian and cycle crossings (2) There is no pedestrian guard railing at the junction (3) Visibility of the junction can be impaired by vehicles waiting to turn. (4) There are staggered two‐stage crossings in place to enable pedestrians to cross the road. The investigator from the Metropolitan Police’s Road Engineering Unit, observed that pedestrians often do not use the crossings as intended. (5) evidence was that in the three years to the end of 2017, there have been 36 reported personal injury collisions within 50 metres of the junction – 17 of which involved pedestrians. (6) In addition, informed me that a collision study undertaken by TfL has identified that whilst collisions involving cyclists had decreased since the introduction of Cycle Superhighway 2, the proportion of collisions involving pedestrians had increased.
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Mrs Bourke,
Mile End Road junction with Grove Road and Burdett Road – Regulation 28 Prevent Future Death Report
We were sorry to hear of the tragic collision that occurred on 16 August 2018 and wish to pass our sincere condolences to the family of Mr Ozan Allen.
We have reviewed your Regulation 28 report and matters of concern dated 1 April 2019. We note your request to prevent future deaths and this letter outlines actions we intend to take.
TfL seeks to reduce collisions across London with initiatives stated in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy (March 2018) and the Vision Zero Action Plan (July
2018). As part of the upgrade of Cycle Superhighway 2 completed in 2016, changes were made at the junction including installing segregated cycle lanes on the Mile End Road approaches, and introducing a right turn ban from Mile End Road (western arm) into Burdett Road (southern arm) and a right turn ban from Burdett Road (southern arm) into Mile End Road (eastern arm). Prior to finalising this design, we considered straight-across crossing design options, but they were not feasible due to adverse impacts which included longer wait times for pedestrians, increased queue lengths for vehicles, and re-routing of traffic on local roads leading to ‘rat-running’. Our implemented design used pedestrian islands to manage a high level of demand by all road users and assist pedestrians crossing due to the junction’s size and complexity. Pedestrian islands minimise clearance times on controlled crossings (the time between one movement losing priority and a conflicting movement gaining priority), allow more time to be allocated to effectively move people and minimise waiting times to cross, provide a protected space for Your ref: Our ref: Sarah Bourke Assistant Coroner
Inner North London Poplar Coroner’s Court 127 Poplar High Street London
cyclists to wait and turn, and provide a suitable location to position signal heads to inform road user decisions. The banned turns have been contentious with some local residents. The London Borough of Tower Hamlets has asked for these to be reviewed. In addition, as per your report, we acknowledge that monitoring of the changes made in 2016 shows that they have reduced the number of collisions affecting cyclists, but the number of collisions involving pedestrians has increased. This impact was not intended as part of that design. We sought to analyse reasons for this and commissioned a collision study that was completed in July 2018, prior to the death of Mr Allen, which involved a review of the recent recorded collision history. This informed a package of further proposals of cycling and walking improvements at this junction. We undertook a public consultation on our proposals which stretched between Hackney and the Isle of Dogs, including this junction, between the 9 May and 21 June 2019 and this can be found on our website at
As outlined in our consultation, we are proposing to re-introduce the right turn from Burdett Road (southern arm) to Mile End Road (eastern arm) but ban the corresponding left turn from Mile End Road (eastern arm) to Burdett Road (southern arm). This will allow us to decrease the overall wait times at the pedestrian crossings on all arms of the junction, as well as the adjacent staggered (two-part) crossing outside Mile End station that is co-ordinated with the operation of the junction. A full sequence of the traffic signals currently takes two minutes (120 seconds) at the busiest times and with the proposed changes it is intended to be reduced to just under a minute and a half (88 seconds). On average at this junction, pedestrians currently wait well over a minute and a half (104 seconds) to cross the road (on a ‘green man’) during the busiest periods, and our proposals would reduce this to under a minute (51 seconds). The reduction in pedestrian wait times will increase the probability of pedestrians arriving to cross on a green through providing more opportunities to cross per hour, and is expected to improve compliance with crossing only during ‘green man’ stages. We are proposing to re-introduce pedestrian guard railing on north-west corner of the junction to direct pedestrians to use the formal crossings provided. We are also investigating signal louvres on green pedestrian signals to reduce the risk of ‘see-through’ problems (where two or more signals are close together and there are risks that road users look at the wrong set of signals), and removal of street furniture such as telephone kiosks to improve pedestrian visibility (subject to discussions with third parties). Our proposals do not remove the use of internal islands, and pedestrians will still be required to cross in two or more movements. A design with no internal islands and straight across and/or diagonal crossings would appear simpler but would reduce overall capacity resulting in greater congestion, as the amount of clearance time would need to be increased. An increase in congestion may result in worse air quality, and increase the risk of some traffic migrating to less
suitable routes to maintain journey times. It would also be a longer distance for people with impaired mobility to cross in a single movement. Our design seeks to limit the occurrence of vehicles being unable to complete a turn due to their exits being blocked though co-ordinated signal control with adjacent junctions, so that visibility will be improved through less stationary or slow moving traffic in the centre of the junction due to exits being blocked. We are currently analysing the consultation feedback for this exercise and we are considering adjustments to the design in light of comments received. We are planning to publish our consultation report by October 2019 which will outline our next steps, and subject to the consultation outcome, funding and other approvals, construction could start in winter 2019/20 and complete by summer 2020. We will then continue to monitor the performance of this junction. We are also proposing to introduce a reduced speed limit of 20mph on the A11 corridor between Bow and Aldgate through the junction, and we are investigating measures on the A11 Mile End Road approaches such as changes to bus stop facilities and relocating the crossing outside Mile End station to reduce the risk of traffic queuing and blocking back into the junction. We have yet to consult on these additional proposals but plan to complete both further projects by 2024 subject to funding, resources, consultation, roadspace co-ordination for build, and due process.
Mile End Road junction with Grove Road and Burdett Road – Regulation 28 Prevent Future Death Report
We were sorry to hear of the tragic collision that occurred on 16 August 2018 and wish to pass our sincere condolences to the family of Mr Ozan Allen.
We have reviewed your Regulation 28 report and matters of concern dated 1 April 2019. We note your request to prevent future deaths and this letter outlines actions we intend to take.
TfL seeks to reduce collisions across London with initiatives stated in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy (March 2018) and the Vision Zero Action Plan (July
2018). As part of the upgrade of Cycle Superhighway 2 completed in 2016, changes were made at the junction including installing segregated cycle lanes on the Mile End Road approaches, and introducing a right turn ban from Mile End Road (western arm) into Burdett Road (southern arm) and a right turn ban from Burdett Road (southern arm) into Mile End Road (eastern arm). Prior to finalising this design, we considered straight-across crossing design options, but they were not feasible due to adverse impacts which included longer wait times for pedestrians, increased queue lengths for vehicles, and re-routing of traffic on local roads leading to ‘rat-running’. Our implemented design used pedestrian islands to manage a high level of demand by all road users and assist pedestrians crossing due to the junction’s size and complexity. Pedestrian islands minimise clearance times on controlled crossings (the time between one movement losing priority and a conflicting movement gaining priority), allow more time to be allocated to effectively move people and minimise waiting times to cross, provide a protected space for Your ref: Our ref: Sarah Bourke Assistant Coroner
Inner North London Poplar Coroner’s Court 127 Poplar High Street London
cyclists to wait and turn, and provide a suitable location to position signal heads to inform road user decisions. The banned turns have been contentious with some local residents. The London Borough of Tower Hamlets has asked for these to be reviewed. In addition, as per your report, we acknowledge that monitoring of the changes made in 2016 shows that they have reduced the number of collisions affecting cyclists, but the number of collisions involving pedestrians has increased. This impact was not intended as part of that design. We sought to analyse reasons for this and commissioned a collision study that was completed in July 2018, prior to the death of Mr Allen, which involved a review of the recent recorded collision history. This informed a package of further proposals of cycling and walking improvements at this junction. We undertook a public consultation on our proposals which stretched between Hackney and the Isle of Dogs, including this junction, between the 9 May and 21 June 2019 and this can be found on our website at
As outlined in our consultation, we are proposing to re-introduce the right turn from Burdett Road (southern arm) to Mile End Road (eastern arm) but ban the corresponding left turn from Mile End Road (eastern arm) to Burdett Road (southern arm). This will allow us to decrease the overall wait times at the pedestrian crossings on all arms of the junction, as well as the adjacent staggered (two-part) crossing outside Mile End station that is co-ordinated with the operation of the junction. A full sequence of the traffic signals currently takes two minutes (120 seconds) at the busiest times and with the proposed changes it is intended to be reduced to just under a minute and a half (88 seconds). On average at this junction, pedestrians currently wait well over a minute and a half (104 seconds) to cross the road (on a ‘green man’) during the busiest periods, and our proposals would reduce this to under a minute (51 seconds). The reduction in pedestrian wait times will increase the probability of pedestrians arriving to cross on a green through providing more opportunities to cross per hour, and is expected to improve compliance with crossing only during ‘green man’ stages. We are proposing to re-introduce pedestrian guard railing on north-west corner of the junction to direct pedestrians to use the formal crossings provided. We are also investigating signal louvres on green pedestrian signals to reduce the risk of ‘see-through’ problems (where two or more signals are close together and there are risks that road users look at the wrong set of signals), and removal of street furniture such as telephone kiosks to improve pedestrian visibility (subject to discussions with third parties). Our proposals do not remove the use of internal islands, and pedestrians will still be required to cross in two or more movements. A design with no internal islands and straight across and/or diagonal crossings would appear simpler but would reduce overall capacity resulting in greater congestion, as the amount of clearance time would need to be increased. An increase in congestion may result in worse air quality, and increase the risk of some traffic migrating to less
suitable routes to maintain journey times. It would also be a longer distance for people with impaired mobility to cross in a single movement. Our design seeks to limit the occurrence of vehicles being unable to complete a turn due to their exits being blocked though co-ordinated signal control with adjacent junctions, so that visibility will be improved through less stationary or slow moving traffic in the centre of the junction due to exits being blocked. We are currently analysing the consultation feedback for this exercise and we are considering adjustments to the design in light of comments received. We are planning to publish our consultation report by October 2019 which will outline our next steps, and subject to the consultation outcome, funding and other approvals, construction could start in winter 2019/20 and complete by summer 2020. We will then continue to monitor the performance of this junction. We are also proposing to introduce a reduced speed limit of 20mph on the A11 corridor between Bow and Aldgate through the junction, and we are investigating measures on the A11 Mile End Road approaches such as changes to bus stop facilities and relocating the crossing outside Mile End station to reduce the risk of traffic queuing and blocking back into the junction. We have yet to consult on these additional proposals but plan to complete both further projects by 2024 subject to funding, resources, consultation, roadspace co-ordination for build, and due process.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 20 August 2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of Ozan Allen (aged 40 years). The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 28 March 2019.
The conclusion of the inquest was that: Mr Allen was hit by a car on 16 August 2018 as he was crossing the road at the junction between Mile End Road and Burdett Road. He died in hospital on 20 August 2018.
The medical cause of his death was: 1a traumatic brain injury 1b road traffic collision
I recorded a short‐form conclusion that Mr Allen’s death was due to a road traffic collision.
The conclusion of the inquest was that: Mr Allen was hit by a car on 16 August 2018 as he was crossing the road at the junction between Mile End Road and Burdett Road. He died in hospital on 20 August 2018.
The medical cause of his death was: 1a traumatic brain injury 1b road traffic collision
I recorded a short‐form conclusion that Mr Allen’s death was due to a road traffic collision.
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Allen was walking along the north side of Mile End Road from Stepney Green Underground Station to Thames Magistrates’ Court. At the junction with Burdett Road, he walked across Mile End Road to the central traffic island. He then ran diagonally in the direction of the central traffic island in Burdett Road. Whilst he was crossing the junction, he was hit by a red Suzuki car that was travelling north up Burdett Road. Mr Allen sustained head injuries in the collision and died in hospital a few days later.
The witness evidence, investigation report and CCTV established that there were a number of vehicles seeking to turn into the westbound section of Mile End Road at the time. In addition, the evidence established that the driver of the Suzuki would not have been able to prevent the collision.
The witness evidence, investigation report and CCTV established that there were a number of vehicles seeking to turn into the westbound section of Mile End Road at the time. In addition, the evidence established that the driver of the Suzuki would not have been able to prevent the collision.
Copies Sent To
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response
Sarah Bourke Assistant Coroner 1 April 2019
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Revise signal sighting standard to explicitly consider signal readability
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Define additional time required for reading gantry-mounted and complex signals
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Clarify "very short duration" definition within the signal sighting standard
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Identify and retrospectively review locations affected by "very short duration" ambiguity
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Clarify "overhead line equipment" in signal sighting standard to mean wires and droppers
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Define acceptable limits for temporary signal obscuration in sighting standards
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Explicitly define cab sight lines for signal positioning based on driver's eye
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Railtrack to conduct safety examination of Paddington station layout and operations.
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.