Allison Bird
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2020-0092
No published response · Over 2 years old
Response Status
Responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
4 Jun 2020
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroners Concerns
_ There was no discussionlexplanation provided to Allison before she underwent planned major thoracic surgery on the 5" March 2018, the explanation given was immediately before she was asked to provide her written consent in the theatre area minutes before surgery commenced, situation which repeated causes me concern for a patient being able to appropriately consider the risks associated with proposed surgery and determine if are willing to consent: There did not appear to be a escalation of monitoring of Allison's vital signs by nursing staff in the 24 hour period commencing at 11.OOam on 12"h March 2018 Nursing staff did not appear to be consistently seeking clinical review following non reassuring vital signs results actually taken in the same 24 hour period referred to in 2 above.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action.
Report Sections
Circumstances of the Death
Allison had undergone elective Bariatric surgery in April 2017 . In October 2017 , she developed a chest infection and was reviewed in the Accident and Emergency Department of BRI and diagnosed with pneumonia and prescribed antibiotics_ Mary
Subsequently she was prescribed further antibiotics by her General Practitioner; her symptoms persisted and she was referred once again to BRI, following which she was discharged without further treatment or follow up. On 18th November she was admitted to BRI due to a worsening in her condition Following test and investigations she was diagnosed as suffering from gastro pulmonary fistula (a connection between the remaining part of her stomach her left lower lung) which had resulted in a very severe lung infection_ the evidence presented the development of such fistula rare but recognised complication of bariatric surgery. Allison was under the care of her original treating surgeon, he sought the assistance and input of visiting thoracic surgeon: A joint decision was taken by both doctors to treat the fistula with conservative treatment in the hope and expectation that the infection and fistula would resolve, and Allison remained in hospital until 14th December 2017_ Subsequent investigations revealed that although the fistula was reducing in size , persisted. Sometime in January 2018 a decision was taken between and that the fistula was unlikely to fully resolve without surgical intervention, and in addition a section of Allison's damaged left lung should also be removed. This required both their specialisms and decision was taken that both surgical interventions would be performed at the same time None of the treating clinicians giving evidence at the inquest could identify any record being made of this, within Allison's medical notes_ discussed his proposed part of the surgery with Allison in an outpatient appointment did not discuss his proposed surgery with Allison until he saw Allison in the theatre area immediately before Allison underwent surgery on Sth March 2018. Post operatively Allison spent an initial period in Intensive she was then transferred to ward 21 surgical ward, however her condition gave rise for concern and she was transferred back to intensive care for a further period until 11 March 2018. However on the morning of 12th March whilst on ward 21, Allison's vital signs began to deteriorate_ It was unclear from the evidence presented to me whether despite this deterioration Allison's vital signs were not more frequently checked in the next 24 hour period in accordance with hospital guidelines. Furthermore from the evidence presented to me it was unclear whether escalation measures to more senior clinicians were undertaken in the next 24 hour period by nursing staff in a timely manner once again in accordance with hospital guidelines_ What was clear from the evidence presented to me was that from approximately 11.0Oam the following 13th March there was significant escalation in Allison's care_ Following review by senior clinicians at this time, a decision was taken that Allison required emergency surgery_ Even before surgery commenced, Allison suffered cardiac arrest; which was successfully treated and From Care, day
Operative findings included pneumothorax and infective_pericarditis which were treated surgically. In addition treating surgeon undertook further surgical intervention in an effort to repair the underlying fistula at the site of Allison's remaining stomach_ Allison survived surgery, however her condition deteriorated post operatively and despite full intensive support she died on the 16"h March 2018.
Subsequently she was prescribed further antibiotics by her General Practitioner; her symptoms persisted and she was referred once again to BRI, following which she was discharged without further treatment or follow up. On 18th November she was admitted to BRI due to a worsening in her condition Following test and investigations she was diagnosed as suffering from gastro pulmonary fistula (a connection between the remaining part of her stomach her left lower lung) which had resulted in a very severe lung infection_ the evidence presented the development of such fistula rare but recognised complication of bariatric surgery. Allison was under the care of her original treating surgeon, he sought the assistance and input of visiting thoracic surgeon: A joint decision was taken by both doctors to treat the fistula with conservative treatment in the hope and expectation that the infection and fistula would resolve, and Allison remained in hospital until 14th December 2017_ Subsequent investigations revealed that although the fistula was reducing in size , persisted. Sometime in January 2018 a decision was taken between and that the fistula was unlikely to fully resolve without surgical intervention, and in addition a section of Allison's damaged left lung should also be removed. This required both their specialisms and decision was taken that both surgical interventions would be performed at the same time None of the treating clinicians giving evidence at the inquest could identify any record being made of this, within Allison's medical notes_ discussed his proposed part of the surgery with Allison in an outpatient appointment did not discuss his proposed surgery with Allison until he saw Allison in the theatre area immediately before Allison underwent surgery on Sth March 2018. Post operatively Allison spent an initial period in Intensive she was then transferred to ward 21 surgical ward, however her condition gave rise for concern and she was transferred back to intensive care for a further period until 11 March 2018. However on the morning of 12th March whilst on ward 21, Allison's vital signs began to deteriorate_ It was unclear from the evidence presented to me whether despite this deterioration Allison's vital signs were not more frequently checked in the next 24 hour period in accordance with hospital guidelines. Furthermore from the evidence presented to me it was unclear whether escalation measures to more senior clinicians were undertaken in the next 24 hour period by nursing staff in a timely manner once again in accordance with hospital guidelines_ What was clear from the evidence presented to me was that from approximately 11.0Oam the following 13th March there was significant escalation in Allison's care_ Following review by senior clinicians at this time, a decision was taken that Allison required emergency surgery_ Even before surgery commenced, Allison suffered cardiac arrest; which was successfully treated and From Care, day
Operative findings included pneumothorax and infective_pericarditis which were treated surgically. In addition treating surgeon undertook further surgical intervention in an effort to repair the underlying fistula at the site of Allison's remaining stomach_ Allison survived surgery, however her condition deteriorated post operatively and despite full intensive support she died on the 16"h March 2018.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Hepatologist Oversight and Fibroscan Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Annual GP Appointment for Co-morbidities
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Transfusion Committees and Tranexamic Acid - England
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inadequate Pre-Operative Risk Assessment
Tranexamic Acid - Scotland, Wales and NI
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inadequate Pre-Operative Risk Assessment
Provide comprehensive information on risks, alternatives, and outcomes for informed patient consent
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Inadequate Pre-Operative Risk Assessment
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.