Jamie Finlay

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2019-0510
Date of Report 17 December 2019
Coroner Jacqueline Devonish
Coroner Area Suffolk
Response Deadline ✓ from report 25 February 2020
All 1 response received · Deadline: 25 Feb 2020
Response Status
Responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 25 Feb 2020
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner’s Concerns
The MATTER OF CONCERN is as follows:-

The design of the filter lane and junction from the A1088 to Thetford Road does not prevent drivers turning right ahead of the bollards, and onto the wrong side of those bollards into Thetford Road.
Responses
Suffolk County Council
17 Dec 2019
Response received
View full response
Dear Ms Devonish

I am responding to the Regulation 28 report dated 17 December 2019 received by me and Cllr Andrew Reid regarding the findings of your investigation into the sad death of Jamie Anthony Finlay.

Following the road traffic collision on the 8 May 2017, one of my highly experienced road safety engineers ( Safety and Speed Management Engineer) was requested to accompany officers from the Suffolk Police Serious Collison Investigation Team (SCIT) on a site visit, this was undertaken on the 13 December 2017.

observations from the site meeting with the Police were as follows:

• Eastbound drivers on the A1088 could physically turn south into Thetford Road on the wrong (west) side of the Thetford Road splitter island and bollard to cut-the- corner.
• It was discussed that this could be the manoeuvre of the eastbound vehicle involved in the fatal collision – he was attempting this then saw V2 approaching at speed westbound whereby V1 pulled back to his side of the road which resulted in a head on collision.
• AccsMap (SCC collision database) over the last 5 years shows the fatal with causation factors of V1 being careless / reckless / in a hurry and V2 failed to look properly.
• There was one slight in 12 / 2015 involving V1 emerging from the side road that failed to look properly and collided with a westbound A1088 vehicle.
• As such this is not a high collision cluster site based on 3 or more injury collisions in last 5 years. Our Ref: MA / EC Date: 24 February 2020 Email:

• Looking at the side road junction layout, we can see that turning left out of the side road traffic enjoys a long taper but it is not a slip on (where speed could build up before joining the main road) as it’s tapering.
• Any alterations could involve removing the taper and squaring up the layout to discourage misuse. This would need to be a physical change (rather than hatching) and involve carriageway break out and new lining works.
• In terms of expected accident reduction / cost-benefit / value-for-money this is expected to be low / poor When considering this junction and the circumstances in which the collision took place, officers have also noted that whilst undertaking the annual review of injury collisions across the county, there are other locations where a higher number and severity of collisions takes place, and as such officers make decisions on sites for remedial engineering solutions taking the whole county into account. Sites are selected and prioritised for remedial works where there is considered to be a high likelihood of a reduction in the frequency and severity of collisions occurring and where vulnerable road users are prioritised, as set out in the Suffolk RoadSafe Strategy (2012-2022).

In reviewing the concerns your raise in your report, to take action to prevent drivers from turning right from the A1088 into Thetford Road in advance of the centre island and bollard, Suffolk County Council proposes the following action:

• undertake a review of the junction design and layout and potential engineering solutions that would reduce the opportunity to turn right in advance of the centre island
• continue to monitor the collisions across the county to identify where remedial action is required by the Council.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 16 December 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Jamie Finlay.

The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 16 December 2019. The conclusion of the inquest was that Jamie Finlay died whilst a passenger of a car which had been driven at speed without braking to avoid a collision with an oncoming vehicle which was turning right before a filter lane bollard on the A1088 junction with Thetford Road, Ixworth.

The medical cause of death was: 1a. Raised intracranial hypertension 1b. Traumatic Brain Injury 1c. Road Traffic Collision
Circumstances of the Death
On 8 May 2017 Jamie Finlay had been collected from home in Woolpit at around 6.16am by his work colleague to drive to Thetford to meet the works vehicle. They journeyed through Norton Village to the A1088 where the colleague drove at the speed limit of 60mph. Jamie’s colleague did not brake as he approached a sweeping bend at the junction with Thetford Road and was perhaps going too fast to avoid a collision with another oncoming vehicle negotiating a right turn from the filter lane. Both drivers swerved to avoid the other. The colleague swerved to the wrong side of the road colliding with the other drivers’ passenger front and side, whilst the other driver swerved to his left into the collision and suffered similar damage to the front left.

The other driver had attempted to take the right turn into Thetford Road on the wrong side of the bollard, where there was a clear view into Thetford Road from the A1088 and a wide radius for undertaking such a manoeuvre. He swerved back into the A1088 when he saw the car, in which Jamie Finlay was a passenger, appear around the bend prior to the junction.

Jamie Finlay was transported from the scene to Addenbrooke’s Hospital where his life support was switched off on 11 May 2017 at 15:59 hours.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.