Allan Watt
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2020-0127
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 5 Aug 2020
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
5 Aug 2020
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) Mr Watt arrived at A&E at 8pm, he was seen within an hour by a nurse practitioner and admission arranged. However after he got onto the ward at 2am he did not see a doctor to be clerked in until 10.30. Both Allan’s family and I as coroner felt this delay was unacceptable. (2)After Allan had been clerked in and IV fluid and antibiotic advised he did not receive an IV line or a first dose of antibiotic until 3pm –it was now 19 hours after he had arrived in A&E and in that period he had received no fluid or drug treatment. (3)Allan died at 18.45, evidence suggested that he may have been too ill to survive even at the time he arrived in the A&E department but I have no doubt that the want of timely assessment and treatment denied him any chance at all. It is my hope that attention to these concerns will indeed prevent future deaths at your hospital.
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Dr Shaw
RE: Allan Arthur Watt Deceased Inquest Date - Thursday 28 May 2020
Further to your Regulation 28 letter of 3 June 2020 following the above inquest, I can confirm we have put in place a detailed action plan outlining the additional actions we plan to take to reduce the risk of a similar incident occurring and therefore improving the standards of care for our patients.
Enclosed is the Action Plan that has been developed following Mr Watt’s inquest which I believe provides the assurance you have requested to prevent future deaths. The Action Plan addresses all three of the concerns raised in your Regulation 28 report and has identified responsible personnel with a timeframe for completion; together with an update on the progress of the relevant action as of the date of this response.
The following documents have been produced to support the Action Plan so far:
1. a. Web V Project Plan
(Action 1)
b. Web V Clinical Risk Management Plan
(Action 1)
c. Web V Report to Clinical Management Group 08.07.20 (Action 1)
d. Web V Report to Clinical Management Group 22.07.20 (Action 1)
e. Approved Business Case for SDEC (June 2020)
(Action 2)
f. Consultant in Charge Standard Operating Procedure DRAFT (Action 4)
g. Senior Clinical Review Pro-forma
(Action 4)
h. Bed Stock & Bed Escalation paper
(Action 5)
i. Escalation Request Pro-forma DRAFT
(Action 5)
j. ED Operational Policy DRAFT
(Action 6)
k. North Cumbria 9 Principles
(Action 7)
l. North Cumbria 9 Poster
(Action 7)
Should you require access to the documentation referred to above, these can be made available on request.
The actions within the plan are rag-rated and will be monitored for compliance and achievement within the weekly Departmental Governance Meeting and monthly within the Care Group Governance meeting. Once the action plan is complete, it will return to the Care Group Governance Meeting for final sign off with a sustainability check 6 months later to provide assurance processes are embedded.
Finally I would like to thank you for highlighting your concerns and hope the enclosed documents provide the assurance of the seriousness with which the Trust has taken our commitment to continuing to improve patient safety and experience.
Should you have the need for further detail or clarity, please contact my office where I will be happy to assist you.
RE: Allan Arthur Watt Deceased Inquest Date - Thursday 28 May 2020
Further to your Regulation 28 letter of 3 June 2020 following the above inquest, I can confirm we have put in place a detailed action plan outlining the additional actions we plan to take to reduce the risk of a similar incident occurring and therefore improving the standards of care for our patients.
Enclosed is the Action Plan that has been developed following Mr Watt’s inquest which I believe provides the assurance you have requested to prevent future deaths. The Action Plan addresses all three of the concerns raised in your Regulation 28 report and has identified responsible personnel with a timeframe for completion; together with an update on the progress of the relevant action as of the date of this response.
The following documents have been produced to support the Action Plan so far:
1. a. Web V Project Plan
(Action 1)
b. Web V Clinical Risk Management Plan
(Action 1)
c. Web V Report to Clinical Management Group 08.07.20 (Action 1)
d. Web V Report to Clinical Management Group 22.07.20 (Action 1)
e. Approved Business Case for SDEC (June 2020)
(Action 2)
f. Consultant in Charge Standard Operating Procedure DRAFT (Action 4)
g. Senior Clinical Review Pro-forma
(Action 4)
h. Bed Stock & Bed Escalation paper
(Action 5)
i. Escalation Request Pro-forma DRAFT
(Action 5)
j. ED Operational Policy DRAFT
(Action 6)
k. North Cumbria 9 Principles
(Action 7)
l. North Cumbria 9 Poster
(Action 7)
Should you require access to the documentation referred to above, these can be made available on request.
The actions within the plan are rag-rated and will be monitored for compliance and achievement within the weekly Departmental Governance Meeting and monthly within the Care Group Governance meeting. Once the action plan is complete, it will return to the Care Group Governance Meeting for final sign off with a sustainability check 6 months later to provide assurance processes are embedded.
Finally I would like to thank you for highlighting your concerns and hope the enclosed documents provide the assurance of the seriousness with which the Trust has taken our commitment to continuing to improve patient safety and experience.
Should you have the need for further detail or clarity, please contact my office where I will be happy to assist you.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 18/02/2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Allan Arthur Watt. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 28th May 2020. The conclusion of the inquest was Allan Arthur Watt had become increasingly unwell over several months despite multiple medical interventions. He was eventually admitted to Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle where he was found to have an ischaemic bowel, The condition was inoperable and led to his death on 20th September 2019. Only at post mortem examination was the cause was found to be systemic vasculitis.
Circumstances of the Death
Relatively fit and well 61 year old joiner up until 3 weeks prior to his death. Patient lost 3 stones in the 3 weeks leading up to his death. Became ill in August and was self-admitted to CIC. Initial tests suggested possible polymyalgia or liver disease. Patient discharged back to H/A for GP follow up.
Second admission to A&E. Discharged with another diagnosis of possible polymyalgia. GP could not confirm polymyalgia. She also suspected some form of liver disease, or Lyme disease. Still no official diagnosis. Seen by GP 16/09/19. Patient had had hiccups for 3 days. GP said that if tests showed an underlying cancer the patient would be dealt with under the 2 week rule (fast track admission treatment etc.). GP expected further CIC investigation.
Thursday 19/09/19 patient’s foot went numb and he became very hot. GP contacted who said call 999. Acute admission to CIC. Kept in A&E until early hours, still no diagnosis.
Wife told that Allan would go to the ward later that morning and she should go home and get some sleep. She attended Larch D the following afternoon to be told by a Consultant that half of her husband’s bowel was necrotic/diseased and death was imminent. He also said that this should have been diagnosed a lot earlier than it was and as such the patient could have been saved.
Alan passed away later that evening. Family were then told that the Coroner would be informed and to expect contact from them. The hospital did not refer the case to the Coroner or the police. The Coroner only found out when the funeral director rang us for an update. Independent PM required in case this case goes to inquest.
Second admission to A&E. Discharged with another diagnosis of possible polymyalgia. GP could not confirm polymyalgia. She also suspected some form of liver disease, or Lyme disease. Still no official diagnosis. Seen by GP 16/09/19. Patient had had hiccups for 3 days. GP said that if tests showed an underlying cancer the patient would be dealt with under the 2 week rule (fast track admission treatment etc.). GP expected further CIC investigation.
Thursday 19/09/19 patient’s foot went numb and he became very hot. GP contacted who said call 999. Acute admission to CIC. Kept in A&E until early hours, still no diagnosis.
Wife told that Allan would go to the ward later that morning and she should go home and get some sleep. She attended Larch D the following afternoon to be told by a Consultant that half of her husband’s bowel was necrotic/diseased and death was imminent. He also said that this should have been diagnosed a lot earlier than it was and as such the patient could have been saved.
Alan passed away later that evening. Family were then told that the Coroner would be informed and to expect contact from them. The hospital did not refer the case to the Coroner or the police. The Coroner only found out when the funeral director rang us for an update. Independent PM required in case this case goes to inquest.
Copies Sent To
in the case
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Hepatologist Oversight and Fibroscan Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Annual GP Appointment for Co-morbidities
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Improve LAS procedures for timing and recording ambulance whereabouts
Fennell Inquiry
Ambulance Handover Delays
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.