Shaun Elliott
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2014-0042
No published response · Over 2 years old
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
28 Mar 2014
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner's Concerns
_ (1) Extensive areas of the evidence concerned a detailed examination of the Police missing person enquiry and the policies, protocols and resources relating to such enquiries. The policies adopted by Thames Valley Police largely follow national guidelines and the matters raised therefore go to that policy making: am informed that the College is currently rewriting the NPIA Missing Person Guidance to be replaced by an Approved Professional Practice.
(2) The evidence revealed that a missing person coordinator was in post but not on at weekends It was apparent from the evidence that an appropriately experienced coordinator will have the time and know-how to examine cases in fine detail_ The officers directly responsible for the enquiry may have many other calls on their time_ The IPCC report recommended there be cover days a week_ A senior police officer reported that this was under review and that other police forces were being contacted to see how they were addressing the issue - 10"h _ duty
(3)Family Liaison: Shaun's family expressed a number of concerns and frustrations in this regard. However relevant to this report specific benefits could be derived from effective family liaison: Namely the family as a source of information together with the potential information sharing and cross referencing; (4) Application of definition of High Risk" in the context of missing persons_ Shaun was assessed as medium risk until 21.00 hours on 10lh July: At that time a Chief Inspector had reviewed the information on the database and applied an "enlarged" interpretation of the high risk definition The evidence revealed that up to that time officers (Sergeants and Inspectors) considered that "High" risk could not apply in the absence of evidence of "Immediate" risk The Jury concluded that the case should have been categorised as high risk on Saturday g" July. These deflnitions are used nationally are potentially part of your review The concerns arising are around whether the definition could for example) be annotated or commented on to clarify when a less Iiteral Interpretation can be applied
(2) The evidence revealed that a missing person coordinator was in post but not on at weekends It was apparent from the evidence that an appropriately experienced coordinator will have the time and know-how to examine cases in fine detail_ The officers directly responsible for the enquiry may have many other calls on their time_ The IPCC report recommended there be cover days a week_ A senior police officer reported that this was under review and that other police forces were being contacted to see how they were addressing the issue - 10"h _ duty
(3)Family Liaison: Shaun's family expressed a number of concerns and frustrations in this regard. However relevant to this report specific benefits could be derived from effective family liaison: Namely the family as a source of information together with the potential information sharing and cross referencing; (4) Application of definition of High Risk" in the context of missing persons_ Shaun was assessed as medium risk until 21.00 hours on 10lh July: At that time a Chief Inspector had reviewed the information on the database and applied an "enlarged" interpretation of the high risk definition The evidence revealed that up to that time officers (Sergeants and Inspectors) considered that "High" risk could not apply in the absence of evidence of "Immediate" risk The Jury concluded that the case should have been categorised as high risk on Saturday g" July. These deflnitions are used nationally are potentially part of your review The concerns arising are around whether the definition could for example) be annotated or commented on to clarify when a less Iiteral Interpretation can be applied
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe your organisation have the power to fake such action:
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 13th July 2011 | commenced an investigation into the death of Shaun Elliott aged 43 years The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest started on 6"h January 2014 and concluded on 24th January 2014, The conclusion of the inquest was a short form conclusion of alcoholldrugs related death together with a narrative
Circumstances of the Death
Shaun Elliott was a resident in a care home providing supported living for people with mental health issues_ He was a vulnerable adult On 6'h July 2011 Shaun did not return from an education outing and was reported to the Police as a missing person on 8" July Late in evening of July an ambulance was called to an address where Shaun had been staying: He was in cardiac arrest .He was taken to hospital but had sustained irreversible hypoxic brain damage and died on the 11th. The medical cause of death was 1a Acute Bronchopneumonia due to 1b Multi drug use_
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.