Lee Bates
PFD Report
Partially Responded
Ref: 2015-0381
1 of 2 responded · Over 2 years old
Response Status
Responses
1 of 2
56-Day Deadline
12 Nov 2015
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroners Concerns
The court heard that neither the psychiatrists sought advice from the sleep apnoea clinic nor did the clinic inform the psychiatrists of the importance of using CPAP , the risks of not so and the risks of sedative medication especially if not using it and the desirability of oximetry _ director of the hospital, said that there was no guidance from GSTT about the use of the CPAP machine, of which psychiatric staff would not be familiar: He presumed that none of the psychiatrists sought guidance about medication, observation or use of the machine in a patient with severe sleep apnoea, as did not see the need. He expected that the sleep clinic would provide any advice that psychiatrists needed in managing the OSA in a psychiatric unit consultant psychiatrist at Cambian, acknowledged that there were risks of death to people with severe OSA given drugs and then not taking CPAP. Physical health care needs were advised by GPs. He said that psychiatric staff did not know about the importance of CPAP nor whether introduction of a drug required monitoring: There is the facility to use pulse oximetry in the hospital, but the implications, if it were to be used in all OSA patients, would need to be considered. There are many OSA patients in Cambian; It is clear that there is an on going risk of avoidable death in patients with OSA in Cambian Churchill hospital (especially If severe and associated with morbid obesity), Although this risk is reduced by use of CPAP machine and increased by use of sedative drugs, and may be mitigated by use of oximetry, such measures require dialogue between specialist physicians and psychiatrists and might require special provision for monitoring of patients that are high risk and require sedation. Neither hospital has addressed how this dialogue is to be instigated when required, nor how these risks should be addressed; reliance on GP advice seeming to be insufficient; doing they
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Dr. Harris, Inquest into the death of Lee Bates Response to a Regulation 28 Report I write in response to your Regulation 28 Report dated 17th September 2015. Iam grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention as the Cambian Group takes all patient safety issues very seriously, particularly where there may be lessons to be learnt more widely. The death of Lec Bates was obviously an extremely sad event and sympathy goes to everyone who knew him, especially his family. From the perspective of the Cambian Group, there are lessons to be learnt; and we will ensure that these are appropriately addressed. Your Report raises an issue in relation to communication between our hospital and the apnoea clinic at St Thomas As you will appreciate, the clinic is operated by Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust which is separate from our hospital: We therefore clearly have no control over them, and vice versa It is clearly important that information is passed appropriately between healthcare professionals to ensure that a patient'$ care is dealt with as holistically and appropriately as possible. Our focus is on the treatement of mental illness. However; wC do understand the need to work collaboratively and proactively to the benefit of our shared patients_ When our patients are referred to this clinic, Or indeed any other physical health clinic at St Thomas' our medical staff provide a handover to St Thomas and the care in relation to those aspects is then transferred to those physical care specialists. With that in mind, and following the inquest into the death of Mr Bates when You indicated your proposal to make this report, my hospital manager at Cambian Churchill Hospital has met with at St Thomas and agreed a protocol going forward to cover the matter set out in the attached document, in order to reduce the possibility of inadequate communication O1 care in the future. Floor; Waterfronf Building, Chancellors Rocd, Hammersmlth Embankment, London, W6 9RU Tel: +44 (0120 8735 6150 Fax: +44 (0120 8735 6151 WvWWW. ccimblangroupcom Ihe Camblan Croup compiises numbe: ol companies which Te registerer in Eng orid Orid Wales cnd the Bailiwick Jeisey. The delails of ilose companies in the Cambian Group Icgislered in Englrind cind Wales can be lound @i Wwv cambiangzoUp com/oboulllegal HHM . Ouk I-Itkr 20th my sleep
Cambian I hope that this letter provides you with the information that you were seeking and am grateful to you for bringing this matter to my attention. Should you have any further concerns on this O1 other matters, please feel free to contact our Group Director of Risk & Quality, Philip
Cambian I hope that this letter provides you with the information that you were seeking and am grateful to you for bringing this matter to my attention. Should you have any further concerns on this O1 other matters, please feel free to contact our Group Director of Risk & Quality, Philip
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe that the Trust has the power to take such action.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 3rd April 2014, opened an inquest into the death of: Lee Mark Anthony Bates, who died on 24th February 2014 at 01.18 hours; in Cambian Churchill London Clinic, It was concluded before a jury on 19th August 2015. The jury found that the medical cause of death was: 1a Zopiclone and Benzodiazepine usage and obstructive sleep apnoea II Severe obesity and concluded that the death was an accident
Circumstances of the Death
The jury found that: "At 0.18. Mr Bates died. The cessation of breath resulted in the CPAP machine stopping. His death was due to a potentially fatal overdose of Zopiclone being ingested in conjunction with benzodiazepines [Note: some were prescribed; some acquired] whilst under one t0 one eyesight observation. No evidence was heard to indicate that staff were sufficiently trained in the implementation of one to one eyesight observation policy: Contributory factors to his death were sleep apnoea and obesity. Technical evidence was admitted confirming that the Continuous Positive Airways Pressure (CPAP) machine delivered a prescribed pressure of air for sleep apnoea and was not a method of providing oxygen or a life support machine, but there was an event between 01.11 and 01.18_ An engineer's evidence was that the machine stopped at this time, but this did not necessarily indicate absence of iife as it could be due to one of three reasons: a) it was manually switched off There was no evidence this had occurred, The machine was managed by Mr Bates and not by the staff, but he was reported to have gone to bed with the mask on his face b) the mask has been removed The mask was witnessed to be on his face at 04.00 and 04.30 when the alarm was raised and CPR begun. c) there was a leak from mask e.g. from poor facial hygiene, beard or break in mask_ The CPAP mask and venting were inspected and were in good condition wth no blockage. strap was fine and fitted together properly_ Igave evidence that his small beard would be insufficient to cause the cessation of recording: The they '
It was reported to the court that hourly observation was noted at 02.00 and 03.00_ nurse gave evidence that she heard his breathing and saw his diaphragm going up and down between 03.00 and 04.00. She and a support worker turned the light on at 04.00 and saw that Mr Bates was moving indicating he was breathing: At 04.30 the support worker; observing from 14 feet away, instinctively felt something was wrong, noting he no longer heard the background noise of the CPAP machine_ The Cambian Churchill reported that since the death there had been a reissue of the observation policy, raised awareness of what it required and staff training: who heads the sleep apnoea clinic which Mr Bates attended in GSTT sald that his overnight oximetry showed he had falls in oxygen levels of 100 per hour; which were reduced to 2.5 per hour with the use of CPAP. He had therefore very severe sleep apnoea, which was dramatically controlled by use of CPAP ] said that there is cumulative damage if the CPAP machine was notused: night it would reduce, but not eliminate the risk of death_ He said that Lorazepam theoretically has an effect on breathing: It should not be used in untreated sleep apnoea_ If used when CPAP was on, it had the potential to make the sleep apnoea worse The impact is statistically small, but in more severe sleep apnoea is more likely to have an effect: He was at a loss to predict if its prescription had contributed to death: He said that the consultant neurologist who saw him in the sleep clinic did not know he was to be prescribed Haloperidol or Lorazepam. He gave no warning or information about risks of prescribing: The professor said that Lorazepam should be avoided, but did not criticize its prescription;, and would have expected the psychiatrists to contact the sleep clinic if thev needed advice. If Mr Bates had to have sedative drugs, and was in his hospital; Isaid that he would be monitored with an oximeter _
It was reported to the court that hourly observation was noted at 02.00 and 03.00_ nurse gave evidence that she heard his breathing and saw his diaphragm going up and down between 03.00 and 04.00. She and a support worker turned the light on at 04.00 and saw that Mr Bates was moving indicating he was breathing: At 04.30 the support worker; observing from 14 feet away, instinctively felt something was wrong, noting he no longer heard the background noise of the CPAP machine_ The Cambian Churchill reported that since the death there had been a reissue of the observation policy, raised awareness of what it required and staff training: who heads the sleep apnoea clinic which Mr Bates attended in GSTT sald that his overnight oximetry showed he had falls in oxygen levels of 100 per hour; which were reduced to 2.5 per hour with the use of CPAP. He had therefore very severe sleep apnoea, which was dramatically controlled by use of CPAP ] said that there is cumulative damage if the CPAP machine was notused: night it would reduce, but not eliminate the risk of death_ He said that Lorazepam theoretically has an effect on breathing: It should not be used in untreated sleep apnoea_ If used when CPAP was on, it had the potential to make the sleep apnoea worse The impact is statistically small, but in more severe sleep apnoea is more likely to have an effect: He was at a loss to predict if its prescription had contributed to death: He said that the consultant neurologist who saw him in the sleep clinic did not know he was to be prescribed Haloperidol or Lorazepam. He gave no warning or information about risks of prescribing: The professor said that Lorazepam should be avoided, but did not criticize its prescription;, and would have expected the psychiatrists to contact the sleep clinic if thev needed advice. If Mr Bates had to have sedative drugs, and was in his hospital; Isaid that he would be monitored with an oximeter _
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Require effective communication among healthcare professionals to avoid conflicting patient advice
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Conflicting mental health care plans
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.