Geoffrey Parry
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2015-0400
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 2 Dec 2015
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
2 Dec 2015
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroners Concerns
During the evidence it transpired that an ECG test which was undertaken on 21s April 2015 was not available to the reviewing consultant anaesthetists prior to surgery: The evidence suggested that there was a problem within the hospital, not specific to ECG tests whereby results from investigative tests and scans are not kept with the patient's medical notes _ In this instance, it appeared that there was a facility for the result of the ECG to be electronically uploaded onto the hospital computer system but this had not happened The evidence at the_hearing_suggested thatthis was a not_uncommon Parry The problem. In this case the unavailability of the scan was not in any way causative 0f Mr Parry's death but could have been: During the evidence it became clear that whilst in intensive care an intravenous line administering noradrenaline was disconnected from Mr Parry which caused his blood pressure to drop significantly to the point of requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation The evidence indicated that it was likely this Iine was disconnected by one of the attending nurses by "accident" as the was not labelled as best practise dictates The evidence revealed that there were no labels for the line to be labelled with and there is no protocol requiring intravenous lines to be labelled to ensure that they are not accidentally disconnected, for example; when other drugs are administered_ The evidence clearly showed that if the noradrenaline line had been clearly labelled it would not have been disconnected as the nurses and medical team within the critical care unit would fully appreciate the implication to the patient
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Mr Barkley Regulation 28 report Mr Geoffrey Parry (died 29th June 2015) Thank you for your letter dated October 2015, which was received by the Health Board on 8 October 2015. have reviewed the points raised within the Regulation 28 report regarding the sad death of Mr response has been informed by senior clinicians responsible for the clinical care provided to Mr Parry and other appropriate colleagues recognise that this will have been a particularly difficult time for Mr Parry's family and would wish to offer my sincere condolences on behalf of the University Health Board_ For ease of reference, will respond to each of the matters of concern you have raised in turn; An ECG test undertaken on 21 April 2015 was not available to the reviewing consultant anaesthetist prior to surgery. The evidence suggested that there was problem within the hospital, not specific to ECG tests whereby results from investigative tests and scans are not kept with the patient's medical notes. In this instance, it appeared that there was facility for the result of the ECG to be electronically uploaded onto the hospital computer system but this had not happened. The University Health Board has taken the opportunity to completely review the systems and processes in place for the storage of ECG investigations. The Cardiac Physiology Department hosts system called MUSE which allows for electronic storage of ECGs. Currently, a limited number of departments utilise this Birud lechyd Prifysgel Caerdydi < Fro vit prellltredol &rvrdd lechyd Lleol Prifysgol Caerdydd a'r Fro < Cardllf and Vale Unlveisity Health Board trie operaticnal namje Cardiff Vale University Local Heahin Boait '01548469 Parry: My system. ABouJ/ Jtive _ 1 and
An upgrade to the MUSE software is anticipated to be released shortly: When this occurs, it will allow for connectivity between the MUSE system and Clinical Portal: The Clinical Portal system records inpatient and outpatient activity; test results; clinical correspondence amongst other patient-related activity Clinical Portal is widely accessible to clinical staff. In order to strengthen use of the MUSE system across the Health Board a number of actions are planned_ An improvement plan to support this is in development and will address numerous areas including: an ECG training needs analysis; improved identification of staff members undertaking ECGs on patients review of ECG machines suitable for purchase to ensure can connect to the MUSE system and improve patient identification on ECGs undertaken; review of ECG machine maintenance with the Clinical Engineering department and a review of the use of the MUSE system to ensure the Cardiac Physiology Department and infrastructure in place to support the MUSE system can sustain an increase in ECG activity using the software_ In order to progress this work over the coming weeks, a paper will be presented to the Health Systems Management Board in December 2015. An intravenous line administering noradrenaline was accidentally disconnected from Mr causing his blood pressure to drop significantly to the point of requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation: An improvement plan has been put in place to strengthen intravenous infusion labelling practice and is being implemented and monitored by the Critical Care department: An audit of current practice undertaken in November 2015 demonstrates satisfactory compliance but with further room for improvement. A standard operating procedure regarding the management of intravenous infusion line is now in development_ Appropriate moisture resistant stickers have been sourced to improve line labelling procedures_ The Practice Educator team implemented training sessions and posters to highlight the incident and arising issues to staff: Arrangements to share the learning from this incident are in place for the Cardiothoracic and Critical Care Directorate in January 2016 and for the Specialist Services Clinical Board in February 2016. Your findings at Mr Parry's inquest are of relevance to all Clinical Boards in the University Health Board. A copy of your Regulation 28 report and my response will be shared with all Clinical Boards with the intention that all clinical areas will review the actions undertaken to date and assess areas of clinical risk in their directorates to minimise risk of recurrence of the matters of concern. hope that the information set out in this letter provides you with the assurance that the Health Board has fully considered the issues raised as a consequence of the inquest into Mr Parry's death and your letter of October 2015, and has taken appropriate action in response. Bwvrdd lechyd Prifxsgol Caerdyud a" Fro Yi enw gweithredol Bxyrdd Iechyd LIcol Frifysgol Coerdydc at Fro 4 Cardift and vale Unlversity Health Board the cperationa name ai Cardin vale University Locz Healtn Board o15a8 1+9 they Parry have bout stive and
An upgrade to the MUSE software is anticipated to be released shortly: When this occurs, it will allow for connectivity between the MUSE system and Clinical Portal: The Clinical Portal system records inpatient and outpatient activity; test results; clinical correspondence amongst other patient-related activity Clinical Portal is widely accessible to clinical staff. In order to strengthen use of the MUSE system across the Health Board a number of actions are planned_ An improvement plan to support this is in development and will address numerous areas including: an ECG training needs analysis; improved identification of staff members undertaking ECGs on patients review of ECG machines suitable for purchase to ensure can connect to the MUSE system and improve patient identification on ECGs undertaken; review of ECG machine maintenance with the Clinical Engineering department and a review of the use of the MUSE system to ensure the Cardiac Physiology Department and infrastructure in place to support the MUSE system can sustain an increase in ECG activity using the software_ In order to progress this work over the coming weeks, a paper will be presented to the Health Systems Management Board in December 2015. An intravenous line administering noradrenaline was accidentally disconnected from Mr causing his blood pressure to drop significantly to the point of requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation: An improvement plan has been put in place to strengthen intravenous infusion labelling practice and is being implemented and monitored by the Critical Care department: An audit of current practice undertaken in November 2015 demonstrates satisfactory compliance but with further room for improvement. A standard operating procedure regarding the management of intravenous infusion line is now in development_ Appropriate moisture resistant stickers have been sourced to improve line labelling procedures_ The Practice Educator team implemented training sessions and posters to highlight the incident and arising issues to staff: Arrangements to share the learning from this incident are in place for the Cardiothoracic and Critical Care Directorate in January 2016 and for the Specialist Services Clinical Board in February 2016. Your findings at Mr Parry's inquest are of relevance to all Clinical Boards in the University Health Board. A copy of your Regulation 28 report and my response will be shared with all Clinical Boards with the intention that all clinical areas will review the actions undertaken to date and assess areas of clinical risk in their directorates to minimise risk of recurrence of the matters of concern. hope that the information set out in this letter provides you with the assurance that the Health Board has fully considered the issues raised as a consequence of the inquest into Mr Parry's death and your letter of October 2015, and has taken appropriate action in response. Bwvrdd lechyd Prifxsgol Caerdyud a" Fro Yi enw gweithredol Bxyrdd Iechyd LIcol Frifysgol Coerdydc at Fro 4 Cardift and vale Unlversity Health Board the cperationa name ai Cardin vale University Locz Healtn Board o15a8 1+9 they Parry have bout stive and
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe that the Chief Executive of the Health Board has the power to take such action:
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 8lh July 2015 commenced an investigation into the death of Geoffrey Parry, aged 74, The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest on 30"h September 2015, The medical cause of death was Ia pneumonia, 1b locally advanced bladder cancer (operated): returned a narrative conclusion "Geoffrey Colin Parry died from the effects of pneumonia which he contracted having undergone major surgery for bladder cancer:
Circumstances of the Death
Mr had been complaining of urinary symptoms for in excess of twelve months_ was referred to a urologist at the University Hospital of Wales and was diagnosed with suffering from an aggressive bladder cancer; He elected to undergo surgery for the removal of the tumour which took place on 1 May 2015. During the lengthy and complex surgery he developed several episodes of abnormal heart rhythm which caused the surgery to be suspended: surgery was eventually completed, successfully, and he was taken to the intensive care unit for further support He made steady progress before developing infection which turned into pneumonia from which he passed away on 29"h June 2015,
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
NPSA to urgently apply engineering design approaches to reduce sentinel events.
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Medical device display errors
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.