Allan Beasley

PFD Report Unknown
Date of Report 26 October 2015
Coroner Louise Hunt
Response Deadline ✓ from report 21 December 2015
No published response · Over 2 years old
Response Status
Responses 0
56-Day Deadline 21 Dec 2015
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner's Concerns
(1) Staff were unaware of the Home's Falls Prevention Policy. This meant staff failed to correctly record falls and escalate to appropriate senior staff: (2) The falls monthly log was not completed on a daily basis as it should have been. The was not completed for June as staff were too busy. This resulted in trends missed and staff unaware of the frequency of Mr Beasley's falls (3) 15 minute observation forms were found to be inaccurate as staff in the office were completing the form when not seeing the patient: In addition the observation forms were felt to be inaccurate as a member of staff signed for observations when it was found they were undertaking another task Documentation is not completed contemporaneously but at the end of the shift The home has a policy that the first fall of a resident is treated as an isolated incident and no further action is taken: (6) The home has a policy that they only escalate to the falls team if a resident has had 3 falls The falls tracker was not completed for Mr Beasley: The falls incident forms were not correctly reviewed by senior staff
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths believe your organisation have the power to take such action.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 17/07/15 commenced an investigation into the death of Allan Richard Beasley_ The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 22/10/15. The conclusion of the inquest was: The deceased died from a traumatic cervical spine fracture following 7 falls_ The initial risk assessment was inadequate. There was a failure to correctly document the falls as they occurred, The risk assessment was not updated and there was no referral to the falls team for further assessment These failures contributed to his death _
Circumstances of the Death
The deceased suffered from vascular dementia. He was admitted to Sunrise care home on 21/05/15 as he could no longer manage at home_ An initial moving and handling assessment confirmed that he could mobilise with 2 sticks but he needed supervision: He was noted to be unsteady on his feet at times. After admission he had a number of falls_ 03/06/15 at 15.00 the deceased was walking to the lounge with his son and lost his balance and fell with no injuries_ 13/06/15 the deceased had two falls_ At 08.30 he was found on the bedroom floor shouting for help and he had grazed his right forearm At 09.30 he was found on the floor with a skin tear to the right wrist: 17/06/15 at 12.00 he was found on the floor in the corridor with no injuries. 22/06/15 no incident form but the deceased was noted to have been found on the floor near his bed and had defecated on the carpet 29/06/15 no time recorded He was walking alongside another resident when there was some sort of altercation with that resident and the deceased fell and grazed his head and bruised his eye. The incident was reported to the police and no further action taken. On 04/07/15 he suffered a further unwitnessed fall in the dining area: He was admitted to Birmingham Heartlands Hospital the same day: A CT scan confirmed C1 burst cervical fracture and a fracture of the odontoid process named as a type 2 odontoid peg fracture. He was treated with a collar but due to his vascular dementia he kept removing the collar_ He developed a chest infection. He continued to deteriorate and passed away on 09/07/15 An external review after the events confirmed the following: The initial risk assessment did not indicate all the risk factors which may contribute to falls_ There is no evidence the initial documents were ever reviewed or that the deputy manager was aware of the number of falls Staff failed to follow the falls prevention policy failed t0 correctly record and and incidents_ The monthly wellness check was not completed at the end of June 2015, and the monthly falls analysis log was not completed. An uneven floor may have contributed to the fall
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Non-mortuary staff accompanied in mortuary
Fuller Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Regular CCTV review with swipe card data
Fuller Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Local authorities examine contractual arrangements
Fuller Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Deceased treated with same dignity as patients
Fuller Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Deceased included in safeguarding training and policy
Fuller Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Chief Nurse responsibility for deceased safeguarding
Fuller Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
NHS England incorporate deceased in safeguarding framework
Fuller Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Independent sector SOPs for deceased patients
Fuller Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Independent sector accompanied access to deceased
Fuller Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Anatomical education security and dignity policies
Fuller Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.