Bartosz Bortniczak
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2015-0452
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 21 Dec 2015
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
21 Dec 2015
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroners Concerns
_ (1) The speed restriction UP to and through the bend is 6Omph but drops to 4Omph after the bend. Given number of incidents on this stretch of road it would appear more appropriate for the reduced speed restriction to apply prior to the bend which was the subject of these inquests. Given the number of incidents in this area, am concern that to leave the speed restriction at sixty miles per hour leads to circumstances continuing t0 create a risk of other deaths occurring: In the circumstances, it is my view that the speed restriction of 4Omph should be moved so that it is_prior to the bend on this stretch of road, Coroner"'s Court and Office Doncaster Crown Court College Road; Doncaster;, DNI 3HS Tel 01302 320844 Fax 01302 364833 the from from the The the
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Ms Mundy Bartosz BORTNICZAK, Blake CAIRNS, Arpad KORE, Jordanna GOODWIN; Megan STOREY (deceased) DoD 15/16 November 2014; RTC Sheffield Road; Conisbrough refer to your Regulation 28 report dated 27 October 2015 and sent to Doncaster MBC further to the conclusion of your inquest am Head of Service, with responsibilities for Waste and Highway Infrastructure As you are aware, the Council was not involved in the inquest: Accordingly, on behalf of the Council; would like to firstly express condolences to the families for their loss as a result of this tragic incident; Secondly, thank you for providing the Council with copies of the relevant inquest documents and also for extending the time for the response to your report: The Council has noted your concern about the speed restriction on the relevant stretch of the A630. The Council is not aware of any previous concerns about the speed limit being raised by South Yorkshire Police. All relevant terminal speed limit signing is in place and is correct on all approaches: Similarly, all signing/lining on the carriageway was in place in accordance with the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002. The road is also lit with overhead street lighting along its length. 1 Doncaster Council 1 Civic Office, Waterdale, Doncaster DNI 3BU equallty mark
However; the Council will always consider relevant issues relating to road safety as far as it can and the concerns you have identified are in the process of being considered: In short, can confirm that; subject to the necessary due process for such a matter, the Council intends to take steps to reduce the speed limit on the relevant stretch of road to 4Omph: changes to the speed limit would also be complimented with additional signing and road markings as appropriate. It is important to note however that changes to speed limits are governed by statutory processes requiring the drafting and publicising of Traffic Regulation Orders, formal consultations and relevant periods for comment or objection: It is therefore not possible to pre-empt the outcome of this necessary due process or indeed to provide a definitive timetable for action. However; in the event that the proposed alteration to the speed limit is approved following the relevant due process, it is anticipated that the Council would be in a position to implement the change by early summer 2016 at the latest.
However; the Council will always consider relevant issues relating to road safety as far as it can and the concerns you have identified are in the process of being considered: In short, can confirm that; subject to the necessary due process for such a matter, the Council intends to take steps to reduce the speed limit on the relevant stretch of road to 4Omph: changes to the speed limit would also be complimented with additional signing and road markings as appropriate. It is important to note however that changes to speed limits are governed by statutory processes requiring the drafting and publicising of Traffic Regulation Orders, formal consultations and relevant periods for comment or objection: It is therefore not possible to pre-empt the outcome of this necessary due process or indeed to provide a definitive timetable for action. However; in the event that the proposed alteration to the speed limit is approved following the relevant due process, it is anticipated that the Council would be in a position to implement the change by early summer 2016 at the latest.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 17/11/2014 commenced an investigations into deaths of Bartosz Kacper Bortniczak who died multiple injuries including haemothorax and dislocated cervical spine; Blake Reece Cairns who died from multiple injuries including transacted thoracic aorta and by ventricular lacerations , Jordanna April Louise Goodwin who died from a fractured skull;, Arpad Kore who died a transacted thoracic aorta and Megan Lea Storey who died from intra pleural and intra-cerebral haemorrhage due to blunt trauma to the chest and head, The conclusion for each of the inquests was Accidental death;
Circumstances of the Death
On the 15"h November 2014 Bartosz Bortniczak was driving his motor vehicle along the A630 in Conisbrough. Blake Cairns; Jordanna Goodwin; Arpad Kore and Megan Storey were passengers in the vehicle Mr Bortniczak entered a right hand bend on this stretch of road at a speed in the region of 73mph. As he steered through the bend he lifted his foot of the accelerator andlor braked causing vehicle to spin; skid and cross to the opposing carriageway where it was in a collision with a vehicle travelling in the opposite direction. The five occupants of the vehicle being driven by Mr Bortniczak all suffered extensive injuries which rapidly proved to be fatal, Police Officers from the Traffic Division of South Yorkshire Police provided evidence that over the last 10 years there have been 18 incidents on this stretch of road, which included 10 fatalities and 2 serious injuries. speed restriction is the National speed limit namely 6Omph
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Revise signal sighting standard to explicitly consider signal readability
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Define additional time required for reading gantry-mounted and complex signals
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Clarify "very short duration" definition within the signal sighting standard
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Identify and retrospectively review locations affected by "very short duration" ambiguity
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Clarify "overhead line equipment" in signal sighting standard to mean wires and droppers
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Define acceptable limits for temporary signal obscuration in sighting standards
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Explicitly define cab sight lines for signal positioning based on driver's eye
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Railtrack to conduct safety examination of Paddington station layout and operations.
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.