Tyrone Lock
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2016-0355
All 2 responses received
· Deadline: 23 Apr 2017
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
2 of 1
56-Day Deadline
23 Apr 2017
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner's Concerns
(1) The jury concluded that Tyrone should have been assessed differently from the first male and should have been classified as a vulnerable person and not as a suspect that was absconding: (2) The jury believed that a second request for a helicopter should have been issued that it would have been deployed and that in this case there would have been a chance to find Tyrone in a survivable state: (3) Collectively there was information available to the police from the OIS logs, what was said to them by the night manager and from their own observations that Tyrone's departure could be described as "hallucinating, foaming/frothing at the mouth, spaced out on drugs, sweating; that he had ran out of the hotel wearing boxer shorts and socks only. It was cold, degrees, it was windy and he ran out into open ground with water courses with somebody out to get him and on the police log according to the night manager an ambulance probably would be idea: It was on this evidence that the jury concluded that Tyrone should have been classified as a vulnerable person_ (4) On that information witnesses from the National Police Air Service (NPAS) confirmed that they would have classified Tyrone as a vulnerable person and would have made every effort to deploy a helicopter to the scene: NPAS further indicated that because one request in the same incident had met with a refusal that did not mean a second request would also be refused. Each request would be dealt with on its own merits_ Here second call would have been treated as a top priority job. NPAS would not be concerned with why someone was running away from the police, their concern would be, run away, that was he at risk of harm.
(5) Contrary to the
(5) Contrary to the
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Mr Tyrone Ashley Lock Deceased Thank you for letter received today that included a Regulation 28 report following the death of Mr Tyrone Locke am aware that Hepworth my Operations Centre Manager has been working alongside local staff and your office to provide information and testimony: feel that it may be useful at this time to update you on our efforts to assist learning from this tragic event at both a local level with West Mercia Police and across England and Wales_ the NPAS Assistant Operations Director for this Region has already contacted West Mercia Police to support them in a Critical Incident debrief for this tragic event. will offer his opinion, supported by my Senior Leadership Team of any improvements in awareness Or 'training that may further benefit the force. On Friday 14 October am attending the NPAS Independent Assurance Group. In brief this is part of our governance structure and represents six Assistant Chief Constables who represent the Regions of England Wales and is also attended by Chief Constable Simon Byrne the National Police Chief Aviation lead. will discuss this matter with them and seek their assurance that are testing the processes and procedures within their Region This matter will also be reported upon to the NPAS Local Strategic Board for further consideration_ This Board is attended by the Chief Constable and Police and Crime Commissioner for West Yorkshire Police. consider what; if any further action is required to share the potential lessons learned in this case. Should you require any further detail, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.
Response received
View full response
Dear Mr Ellery Response to Regulation 28 Report into Tyrone Ashley Lock Inquest: 3-6 October 2016 have read the regulation notice dated 13th October 2016 pertaining to above inquest and have noted the six points of concern that you have identified. respond to each one separately as follows_ Point 1 Tyrone should have been treated as a vulnerable person and not a suspect Response This point is accepted_ can confirm that in terms of supporting officers and staff West Mercia Police has already embarked on an extensive programme of work to raise awareness and understanding of vulnerability _ We are keen that our people are professionally curious and recognise where those who cannot help themselves may require our help, support and intervention. We are finalising a vulnerability strategy which includes national effective practice POLICE NON-EMERGENCY IN AN EMERGENCY (ho1 CAE7A%59 www: westmercia:police.uk wmerciapolice west mercia Jury the police
We have piloted a programme within the Telford area which encourages officers and staff to see beyond the obvious and think wider. This will be rolled out across West Mercia in 2017 . The use of the National Decision Making Model (NDM) is embedded across West Mercia. The NDM has six key elements_ Each provides frontline officers and staff with an area for focus and consideration and can be applied to a range of circumstances. We have complemented the NDM by introducing the THRIVE model, (Threat; Harm, Risk, Investigation, Vulnerability, Engagement) across the Force_ NDM and THRIVE both provide a framework for officers and staff to seek out as much information that can and make sound rational decisions to protect the public_ To increase our professionalism further, officers and staff have been provided with an ongoing programme of development built around protecting people from harm. Officers and staff with specialist knowledge have provided training across the 13 strands of public protection; including high harm areas such as mental health and missing persons. These sessions are also supported by an extensive programme of on-Iline learning and knowledge checks provided by the College of Policing: Clearly every incident reported to the Police will be assessed on its own merits However such an extensive programme of ongoing work will ensure that going forward, officers and staff will be better placed to identify and manage vulnerability and ultimately protect the public we serve. Point 2 That a second call to request the services of the helicopter should have been issued. Response 2 This point is accepted. Throughout the investigation into Tyrone's death, there has been extensive consultation with colleagues in NPAS in order that we better understand the NPAS call out procedure and ensure that this is clearly articulated to operational officers and staff Following the inquest TIACC Cullen chaired Critical incident Management Meeting which was attended by senior colleagues from NPAS. NPAS have subsequently written to all 44 police forces in England and Wales briefing document on the policy and procedure for the deployment of NPAS aircraft: This includes the key that when request is declined that decision will remain under review and it should not be assumed a second request will also be declined Further; in consultation with NPAS, we have ensured that where attendance is declined, fuller explanation setting out the reasons for non attendance is provided: This additional information will assist officers on the ground to review the information have, to re- assess whether another request may be necessary. This was an important aspect of this particular case and am satisfied that this change in procedure will help to ensure that further secondary requests for air support are always considered in the future. Point 3 Collectively there was information available to the police at the time that led the jury to conclude that Tyrone should have been classified as a vulnerable person. they point they
Response 3 This is accepted and as outlined in response 1, West Mercia has embarked on an ambitious programme to enhance vulnerability training for all staff and officers across the organisation to ensure such situations do not occur in the future. Point 4 That NPAS have stated that had received a second call to attend following Tyrone running off from officers, would have made every effort to attend: Response 4 As outlined in response 2, it is accepted that officers on the ground should have considered that a second call to NPAS be made_ have set out in response 2 what actions we have already taken in consultation with NPAS to ensure that officers are aware of the call out procedures for; and capability of, NPAS so that similar circumstances be prevented in the future. Point 5 This point includes two separate issues: i) Contrary to NPAS evidence the police officers concerned believed that regardless of Tyrone's status; a second call to NPAS would have met with the same result and there would be no point in making such a request i) Two duty Sergeants involved on the Saturday and Monday had different views as to what risk of meant Response 5 i) As outlined in responses 2 and 4, all officers have now received clear and concise guidance relating to NPAS call out procedures and capability i) Clearly the situation had developed over time and the Sergeant who managed the incident on Saturday morning was acting upon different information and was under different belief than the Sergeant who recovered Tyrone's body on the Monday morning: Whilst policing by its very nature will always be dynamic our investment in developing officers and staff is designed to promote consistency and ensure such situations are avoided in the future_ Point 6 This point includes two separate issues - a) NPAS are included in this report SO that liaison may take place between the two organisations b) NPAS are to review whether any other police force may also have a similar lack of understanding they they may harm
Response 6 a) As outlined in response 2, West Mercia Police has already undertaken extensive Iiaison with NPAS in relation to this case and the learning points emanating from it, for both organisations_ b) understand that NPAS are actioning this point separately and have responded to you directly. am satisfied that with the extensive programme of vulnerability training already underway, coupled with the ongoing improvements already put in place with NPAS colleagues, the force has done all it can to prevent such a circumstance arising again. trust that the above response demonstrates how seriously the force has taken the learning this tragic incident; and answers your concerns in relation to matters raised
We have piloted a programme within the Telford area which encourages officers and staff to see beyond the obvious and think wider. This will be rolled out across West Mercia in 2017 . The use of the National Decision Making Model (NDM) is embedded across West Mercia. The NDM has six key elements_ Each provides frontline officers and staff with an area for focus and consideration and can be applied to a range of circumstances. We have complemented the NDM by introducing the THRIVE model, (Threat; Harm, Risk, Investigation, Vulnerability, Engagement) across the Force_ NDM and THRIVE both provide a framework for officers and staff to seek out as much information that can and make sound rational decisions to protect the public_ To increase our professionalism further, officers and staff have been provided with an ongoing programme of development built around protecting people from harm. Officers and staff with specialist knowledge have provided training across the 13 strands of public protection; including high harm areas such as mental health and missing persons. These sessions are also supported by an extensive programme of on-Iline learning and knowledge checks provided by the College of Policing: Clearly every incident reported to the Police will be assessed on its own merits However such an extensive programme of ongoing work will ensure that going forward, officers and staff will be better placed to identify and manage vulnerability and ultimately protect the public we serve. Point 2 That a second call to request the services of the helicopter should have been issued. Response 2 This point is accepted. Throughout the investigation into Tyrone's death, there has been extensive consultation with colleagues in NPAS in order that we better understand the NPAS call out procedure and ensure that this is clearly articulated to operational officers and staff Following the inquest TIACC Cullen chaired Critical incident Management Meeting which was attended by senior colleagues from NPAS. NPAS have subsequently written to all 44 police forces in England and Wales briefing document on the policy and procedure for the deployment of NPAS aircraft: This includes the key that when request is declined that decision will remain under review and it should not be assumed a second request will also be declined Further; in consultation with NPAS, we have ensured that where attendance is declined, fuller explanation setting out the reasons for non attendance is provided: This additional information will assist officers on the ground to review the information have, to re- assess whether another request may be necessary. This was an important aspect of this particular case and am satisfied that this change in procedure will help to ensure that further secondary requests for air support are always considered in the future. Point 3 Collectively there was information available to the police at the time that led the jury to conclude that Tyrone should have been classified as a vulnerable person. they point they
Response 3 This is accepted and as outlined in response 1, West Mercia has embarked on an ambitious programme to enhance vulnerability training for all staff and officers across the organisation to ensure such situations do not occur in the future. Point 4 That NPAS have stated that had received a second call to attend following Tyrone running off from officers, would have made every effort to attend: Response 4 As outlined in response 2, it is accepted that officers on the ground should have considered that a second call to NPAS be made_ have set out in response 2 what actions we have already taken in consultation with NPAS to ensure that officers are aware of the call out procedures for; and capability of, NPAS so that similar circumstances be prevented in the future. Point 5 This point includes two separate issues: i) Contrary to NPAS evidence the police officers concerned believed that regardless of Tyrone's status; a second call to NPAS would have met with the same result and there would be no point in making such a request i) Two duty Sergeants involved on the Saturday and Monday had different views as to what risk of meant Response 5 i) As outlined in responses 2 and 4, all officers have now received clear and concise guidance relating to NPAS call out procedures and capability i) Clearly the situation had developed over time and the Sergeant who managed the incident on Saturday morning was acting upon different information and was under different belief than the Sergeant who recovered Tyrone's body on the Monday morning: Whilst policing by its very nature will always be dynamic our investment in developing officers and staff is designed to promote consistency and ensure such situations are avoided in the future_ Point 6 This point includes two separate issues - a) NPAS are included in this report SO that liaison may take place between the two organisations b) NPAS are to review whether any other police force may also have a similar lack of understanding they they may harm
Response 6 a) As outlined in response 2, West Mercia Police has already undertaken extensive Iiaison with NPAS in relation to this case and the learning points emanating from it, for both organisations_ b) understand that NPAS are actioning this point separately and have responded to you directly. am satisfied that with the extensive programme of vulnerability training already underway, coupled with the ongoing improvements already put in place with NPAS colleagues, the force has done all it can to prevent such a circumstance arising again. trust that the above response demonstrates how seriously the force has taken the learning this tragic incident; and answers your concerns in relation to matters raised
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action: and very good having they
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 25th November 2015 commenced an investigation into the death of Tyrone Lock, 18 years of age, who was found deceased in a pond at the Macdonald Hill Valley Hotel, Golf & Spa on the morning of Monday 23rd November 2015_ The inquest; with a jury, commenced on the 3rd October 2016 and concluded on the 6th October 2016. The jury recorded narrative conclusion identifying police failings contributing to Tyrone's death:
Circumstances of the Death
Tyrone and 2 friends checked in to the Hill Valley Hotel on November 2015. During the night and early morning of Saturday 21st November 2015 there were disturbances which resulted in the police called. On their arrival the police saw a male get out of and run away from a van which he had been driving: A request for police helicopter was made in respect of that male, namely a suspected drink driver making off on foot with no aggravating features_ The limited flying time available did not make a deployment viable: During this time Tyrone and his female friend were still inside the hotel and were in the main reception area as seen on the hotel CCTV_ Following their contact with the male who had run away the officers then entered the hotel. At that time Tyrone and the female were inside a hotel lift. When they came out one officer primarily dealt with the female and the other sought to engage with Tyrone_ Without being able to do so Tyrone ran of the hotel wearing boxer shorts and socks only: It was cold night; approximately 4 degrees centigrade; it was windy. police unit attempted to find Tyrone but without success He had been classified by the police as an absconder, not a5 a vulnerable person and second request for a helicopter was not made. He was found 2 days later on the 23rd November 2015 in a pond between the 16th and 18th fairways: and Ashley 20th Friday being out dog
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Apply best offer principle equally in GLOS
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Police investigation management
Close HSS Dispute Resolution Procedure when HSSA opens
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Police investigation management
Establish standing public body to administer future redress schemes
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Police investigation management
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.