UK Inquiry Tracker

Christopher Evans

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2023-0132

Date of Report 24 April 2023

Coroner Peter Harrowing

Coroner Area Avon

Response Deadline ✓ from report 19 June 2023

Other related deaths

Judiciary.uk Report PDF

No published response · Over 2 years old

Sent To

Response Status

Responses 0 of 3

56-Day Deadline 19 Jun 2023

Over 2 years old — no identified published response

About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner's Concerns

(I) Mr. Evans resided in supported accommodation which was appropriately licensed as an HMO. The provision and maintenance of seivices, including electricity, gas and water was the responsibility of Supported Independence Limited. However, the HMO licence did not require there be thermostatic control valves fitted to the hot water taps in the Deceased's flat.

(2) Since the Deceased resided in his own accommodation and was not provided with a regulated activity. the accommodation was not regulated nor subject to inspection by the CQC.

(3) Similarly the HSE had no authority to inspect premises under the Health and Safety at Work Act 197 4 as the Deceased resided in his own home. (4) if the Deceased, who was vulnerable, had resided in health and social care premises then there would have been a requirement to assess the risk of scalding and burning in the context of his vulnerability.

(5) Engineering controls could then have been provided to minimise the risk of scalding particularly where there is whole body immersion.

(6) In accommodating vulnerable persons in such an HMO there appears to be a deficiency in the regulatory framework in that there is no requirement to assess and manage the risk of scalding and no oveiview by any regulatory body.

Report Sections

Investigation and Inquest

On 9th December 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mr. Christopher Evans age 56 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 1st March 2023. The conclusion was that the medical cause of death was l(a)Acute myocardial ischaemia; 1(b) Coronary Artery Atheroma and immersion in hot water and the conclusion as to the death was that 'The Deceased died of an acute cardiac event following immersion in very hot water'

Circumstances of the Death

The Deceased had a long history of alcohol misuse, although he had a very low level of alcohol in his blood at the time of his death, and poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. As a result he was vulnerable and his physical health was deteriorating. Following a Care Act assessment on 7th September 2020 social services determined that the Deceased required placement with 24-hour care appropriate to meet his care and support needs. A referral was made to the Extra Care Housing team in order that a suitable placement be found. In the meantime the Deceased was placed in supported accommodation provided by Supported Independence Limited. The services provided Supported Independence Limited were registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). However, the Deceased's accommodation was a small flat within a single building comprising a number of similar fiats. The building was licensed with the local authority as a house in multiple occupation (HMO) and therefore was not within the remit of the CQC. On moving to his supported accommodation on 6th February 2019 a support plan and risk assessment were prepared. One of the risks identified was that he was at risk when bathing independently due to his mobility issues, his heavy drinking and his diabetes. The risk was to be managed by the Deceased telling the staff when he was going to have a bath and the staff would then monitor him regularly so that they could attend to any problems he may have. On the morning of 28th September 2020 the Deceased was found by a member of staff unresponsive in his bath. He had not informed staff of his intention to take a bath. The bath was full of water and the Deceased was almost completely submerged. A member of staff described the water as 'boiling' meaning it was very hot and not literally. A paramedic who attended was unable to put his gloved hand into the water because it was so hot. The Deceased was pronounced dead at the scene. The post-mortem examination confirmed the Deceased had suffered with injuries in keeping with scalding. The degree of burns/ scalding was not sufficient to cause death on their own but the pain and trauma likely precipitated acute myocardial ischaemia. Death by drowning was considered unlikely.