Brian Chapman
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2024-0164
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 21 May 2024
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
21 May 2024
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
One of the two vehicles involved in the collision was a double decker service bus travelling a scheduled route between Peterborough and Norwich, a distance of approximately 80 miles. The bus was not fitted with passenger seatbelts. I heard evidence that although since 01.10.01 seatbelts are required to be fitted in all new buses(this vehicle was on a ‘63’ plate’) there is an exemption where such vehicles are designed for urban use with standing passengers. Whilst this particular route required the bus to travel from/to and stop off in 5-6 urban centres the majority of the journey took place on a major A route through rural areas. The speed of the bus at the point of collision was approximately 53mph. Both the bus driver and an upper deck passenger were killed in the collision. Whilst there was no evidence that either death would have been prevented by the wearing of seatbelts a number of other passengers were injured in the collision. I am concerned where buses are undertaking journeys such as this through predominantly rural locations and subject to the national speed limit without seatbelts being required there is an obvious risk of death to passengers if collisions occur, particularly at high speed.
Responses
The Department for Transport affirms the existing regulatory framework for bus seatbelts, which includes an exemption for buses designed for standing passengers. Officials will write to the CPT (trade body) and the Office of the Traffic Commissioner to emphasize the importance for operators to select appropriate vehicles and consider seatbelts for routes.
AI summary
View full response
Dear Mr Milburn,
Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 24 January, sent to the Department for Transport following the conclusion of your inquest into the death of Brian William Chapman. I am sorry to hear of the tragic death of Mr Chapman, for which I offer my sincere condolences to his family and friends.
Travel by bus and coach is one of the safest modes of road transport in Great Britain. That said, the Department is committed to improving safety for all bus passengers using appropriate vehicle construction standards and ensuring the safe operation of vehicles.
Our national regulations set the minimum construction standards for new road vehicles and utilise a number of specifications that are harmonised with the wider international community. Since 2001, seat belts have been required for each forward and rearward facing seat in all new buses. The only exemption from the mandatory requirement to fit seatbelts is for buses designed to carry standing passengers. These tend to travel at moderate speeds on urban routes and are relatively heavy when compared to most of the adjacent traffic. This means that seat belts would have only a very limited road safety benefit and are not required to ensure comparable levels of protection between seated and standing passengers.
Once a bus is approved for use there are no specific regulations to restrict the type of roads it can use and for standard bus services it is for the operator to choose the type of vehicle used to provide a given service, and this should take account of the type of intended operation. Exceptions to this cover From the Secretary of State The Rt Hon Mark Harper MP
Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR
contracted or tendered services where the local transport authority can specify the type of vehicles or equipment to be used, which could include requiring only vehicles fitted with seat belts.
Traffic Commissioners are responsible for licensing and regulation of those who operate buses and the registration of most bus services. On the request of a local transport authority, a traffic commissioner can consider the potential use of Traffic Regulation Conditions (TRCs) to prevent danger to road users. It would be for the individual traffic commissioners to determine whether their powers could extend to the use of a TRC to restrict certain buses from particular roads.
Overall, we believe the existing regulatory framework is appropriate as it harmonises vehicle construction with the wider international community and provides proportionate safeguards whilst ensuring the legislative landscape is sufficiently flexible to meet the needs of the local community. This ensures the economic viability and sustainability of bus services, which in turn supports social inclusion and the local economy, particularly in rural areas.
Finally, my officials will write immediately to the CPT, the trade body which represents bus and coach operators, highlighting the importance for their members in selecting appropriate vehicles based on the type of bus service operated, including full consideration of using only vehicles fitted with seat belts. At that same time they will also write to the Office of the Traffic Commissioner to raise awareness of this issue.
Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 24 January, sent to the Department for Transport following the conclusion of your inquest into the death of Brian William Chapman. I am sorry to hear of the tragic death of Mr Chapman, for which I offer my sincere condolences to his family and friends.
Travel by bus and coach is one of the safest modes of road transport in Great Britain. That said, the Department is committed to improving safety for all bus passengers using appropriate vehicle construction standards and ensuring the safe operation of vehicles.
Our national regulations set the minimum construction standards for new road vehicles and utilise a number of specifications that are harmonised with the wider international community. Since 2001, seat belts have been required for each forward and rearward facing seat in all new buses. The only exemption from the mandatory requirement to fit seatbelts is for buses designed to carry standing passengers. These tend to travel at moderate speeds on urban routes and are relatively heavy when compared to most of the adjacent traffic. This means that seat belts would have only a very limited road safety benefit and are not required to ensure comparable levels of protection between seated and standing passengers.
Once a bus is approved for use there are no specific regulations to restrict the type of roads it can use and for standard bus services it is for the operator to choose the type of vehicle used to provide a given service, and this should take account of the type of intended operation. Exceptions to this cover From the Secretary of State The Rt Hon Mark Harper MP
Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR
contracted or tendered services where the local transport authority can specify the type of vehicles or equipment to be used, which could include requiring only vehicles fitted with seat belts.
Traffic Commissioners are responsible for licensing and regulation of those who operate buses and the registration of most bus services. On the request of a local transport authority, a traffic commissioner can consider the potential use of Traffic Regulation Conditions (TRCs) to prevent danger to road users. It would be for the individual traffic commissioners to determine whether their powers could extend to the use of a TRC to restrict certain buses from particular roads.
Overall, we believe the existing regulatory framework is appropriate as it harmonises vehicle construction with the wider international community and provides proportionate safeguards whilst ensuring the legislative landscape is sufficiently flexible to meet the needs of the local community. This ensures the economic viability and sustainability of bus services, which in turn supports social inclusion and the local economy, particularly in rural areas.
Finally, my officials will write immediately to the CPT, the trade body which represents bus and coach operators, highlighting the importance for their members in selecting appropriate vehicles based on the type of bus service operated, including full consideration of using only vehicles fitted with seat belts. At that same time they will also write to the Office of the Traffic Commissioner to raise awareness of this issue.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 14 July 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Brian William CHAPMAN aged 76. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 19 April 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Medical cause of death – 1a Multiple traumatic injuries; Conclusion – Road Traffic Collision
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Chapman was a passenger seated on the upper deck of a bus travelling eastbound on the A47 at Wisbech St Mary on 26.06.18. At approximately 0728hrs the bus driver did not react to the presence of an articulated lorry which was undertaking a right hand turn from a haulage depot on the nearside of the carriageway onto the westbound carriageway of the A47. The bus collided at sped with the lorry trailer which was sat across the eastbound carriageway. Extensive damage was caused to both vehicles and sadly Mr Chapman suffered significant and unsurvivable traumatic injuries. His death was confirmed at the scene by a paramedic at 0826hrs.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.