Alan Baker
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2025-0643
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 18 Feb 2026
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
18 Feb 2026
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
I have concerns that (a) there is no mandatory requirement for LGVs to have reversing cameras fitted to enable drivers to see more thoroughly behind their vehicle before carrying out a reversing manoeuvre and (b) that there is no mandatory requirement for the owners of vehicles which do have such cameras to ensure they are maintained in a fully functioning state.
Responses
The Department for Transport has launched a consultation on mandating vehicle safety technologies, including those covered by UN R158, for new vehicles. They will ask officials to raise the inclusion of goods vehicle trailers in UN R158 at a future UNECE working group and will consider mandating these devices as part of annual roadworthiness tests if they become mandatory.
AI summary
View full response
Dear Ms Thompson,
Thank you for your report of 24 December 2025 made under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, following the inquest you conducted into the death of Alan Baker. I am responding as the Minister for Roads and Buses.
I was very saddened to learn of Mr Baker’s death and offer my sincere condolences to his family and friends.
The Department is strongly committed to improving the safety of all road users, and this includes ensuring that new vehicles are approved, to demonstrate that they comply with a range of technical requirements before they can be sold. The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) is the principal body for vehicle regulations, and the UK is an active member of its technical committees. The relevant regulation in this case is UNECE Regulation No. 158 (UN R158) on Approval of devices for reversing motion and motor vehicles with regard to the driver’s awareness of vulnerable road users behind vehicles.
UN R158 requires all passenger and goods vehicles to be fitted with a device that warns the driver when it detects vulnerable road users to the rear of the vehicle. The regulation does not mandate a camera as UNECE regulations are generally drafted to be technology neutral, to allow for innovation as technical development progresses. UN R158 sets performance requirements and mandates that two of the following warnings are provided to the driver: audible, optical, and haptic.
The Government launched its Road Safety Strategy on 7 January, and this included a consultation on proposals to mandate fitment of a range of vehicle safety technologies, including those covered by UN R158. Subject to the
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL outcome of the consultation, we expect that UN R158 will be mandated in the GB approval scheme for new vehicles.
Goods vehicle trailers such as the one involved in this collision are not currently in scope of UN R158. During 2025, a review of UN R158 was undertaken by the UNECE working group, and although the United Kingdom supported amending the scope to include goods vehicle trailers, there was insufficient support from other countries to do so. I believe this tragic case highlights the importance of reconsidering the scope of UN R158, and I have asked my officials to raise this in the April session of the UNECE working group.
The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) provides advice to operators on vehicle roadworthiness and safe operation, and will look to promote opportunities for using these types of devices and ensuring they stay effective. Should these devices become mandatory in the future, DfT and DVSA will consider if they should form part of the annual roadworthiness test and other inspections.
Thank you for your report of 24 December 2025 made under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, following the inquest you conducted into the death of Alan Baker. I am responding as the Minister for Roads and Buses.
I was very saddened to learn of Mr Baker’s death and offer my sincere condolences to his family and friends.
The Department is strongly committed to improving the safety of all road users, and this includes ensuring that new vehicles are approved, to demonstrate that they comply with a range of technical requirements before they can be sold. The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) is the principal body for vehicle regulations, and the UK is an active member of its technical committees. The relevant regulation in this case is UNECE Regulation No. 158 (UN R158) on Approval of devices for reversing motion and motor vehicles with regard to the driver’s awareness of vulnerable road users behind vehicles.
UN R158 requires all passenger and goods vehicles to be fitted with a device that warns the driver when it detects vulnerable road users to the rear of the vehicle. The regulation does not mandate a camera as UNECE regulations are generally drafted to be technology neutral, to allow for innovation as technical development progresses. UN R158 sets performance requirements and mandates that two of the following warnings are provided to the driver: audible, optical, and haptic.
The Government launched its Road Safety Strategy on 7 January, and this included a consultation on proposals to mandate fitment of a range of vehicle safety technologies, including those covered by UN R158. Subject to the
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL outcome of the consultation, we expect that UN R158 will be mandated in the GB approval scheme for new vehicles.
Goods vehicle trailers such as the one involved in this collision are not currently in scope of UN R158. During 2025, a review of UN R158 was undertaken by the UNECE working group, and although the United Kingdom supported amending the scope to include goods vehicle trailers, there was insufficient support from other countries to do so. I believe this tragic case highlights the importance of reconsidering the scope of UN R158, and I have asked my officials to raise this in the April session of the UNECE working group.
The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) provides advice to operators on vehicle roadworthiness and safe operation, and will look to promote opportunities for using these types of devices and ensuring they stay effective. Should these devices become mandatory in the future, DfT and DVSA will consider if they should form part of the annual roadworthiness test and other inspections.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 04 September 2024, I commenced an investigation into the death of Alan Richard BAKER aged 67. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 16 December 2025. The medical cause of death was: 1a) Traumatic Chest, Pelvis and Leg Injury 1b) Road Traffic Collision 1c) 1d)
2) Ischaemic Heart Disease, Systemic Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus The conclusion of the inquest was: Road Traffic Collision
2) Ischaemic Heart Disease, Systemic Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus The conclusion of the inquest was: Road Traffic Collision
Circumstances of the Death
On 7th August 2024, Mr Baker was travelling on his motorcycle along Muck Lane, Rackheath when the LGV behind which he was travelling stopped to allow another vehicle to pass and carried out a reversing manoeuvre. Due to the close proximity of the motorcycle to the LGV it ran over Mr Baker causing him to sustain catastrophic injuries. He was taken to Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, where he sadly died as a consequence of his injuries on 25th August 2024.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.