David Hughes

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2016-0040
Date of Report 9 February 2016
Coroner Catherine Mason
Response Deadline est. 5 April 2016
All 1 response received · Deadline: 5 Apr 2016
Response Status
Responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 5 Apr 2016
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner's Concerns
During course of the inquest the evidence revealed malters giving rise t0 concern_In and they with the my opinion there is a risk that fulure deaths will occur unless action is taken: In the circumstances my statutory duty t0 report t0 you: Level 2 observations were not conducted at the prescribed time intervals and periods of up to two hours lapsed between observations that should have been conducted every 15 minutes When observalions were conducted they were nol always carried out as per the protocol, Assurances have been given at previous inquests that the performing and recording of these observations would be monitored audited and staff would be trained regarding the importance of such observations The same assurances were given at Mr: Hughes' inquest therefore appears that changes have not been made or If (hey have they are not working Alternatively, changes may occur in the short-term but they are not being maintained and therefore the monitoring and auditing systems, if Implemented, appear not t0 be working Fluid balance charts were not properly completed: There was no uniformity as to how or when staff would record fluid intake Some staff would record fluid if gave Mr. Hughes drink Some would record If they witnessed Mr; Hughes drink it. Therefore, Ihe fluid balance charts were rendered meaningless; Patient bedrooms are not fitted with a call bell system. The staff rely on patients being able to leave their bedroom and seek help or be able t0 shout loudly enough to be heard Clearly patient who Is s0 unwell that they can do neither would not be able t0 alert staff that assistance was required The nursing staff who gave evidence were Registered Mental Health Nurses Or Health Care Support Workers. The evidence that they gave suggested they may not appreciate the signs and symptoms of a physical problem illness One nurse said thal he would not Although it is understood that discussions have taken place regarding the recruitment of 5 Registered General Nurses t0 supplement the 2 already in post at the Bradgate Unit and address this concern, it is understood that recruitment has not yet occurred and no date for commencement of recruitment could be
Responses
DownloadDavid Hughes Response
29 Mar 2016
Response received
View full response
Dear Mrs Mason Re: David Granville Oswald Hughes Further t0 your report dated 09 February 2016, in accordance with paragraph Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, offer the following response. We carried out a Serious Incident Investigalion following Mr Hughes death and reported the actions we have taken as a result of the findings at the inquest: We have also considered the matters of concern (hat have arisen during the course of the inquest of Mr David Hughes. Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust takes these matters very seriously and hope thal and Mr Hughes' family will be satisfied that we have laken' the appropriale measures t0 prevent such an occurrence happening again. The matters of concern you have ralsed as follows: Level 2 observations were not conducted at the prescribed time intervals and periods of Up to two hours lapsed between observations that should have been conducted every 15 minutes: When observations were conducted were not always carried out as per the protocol: Assurances have been given at previous inquests that the performing and recording of these observations would be monitored, audited and staff would be trained regarding the importance of such observations. The same assurances were given at Mr Hughes' inquest:. It therefore appears Ihat changes have not been made or if have they are not working Alternatively changes may occur in the short- term but they are not being maintained and therefore the monitoring and auditing systems, if implemented, appear not to be working: Chair; Cathy Ellis Chiel Executive; Dr Peler Miller you are they they

Service response The poor practice demonstrated by staff regarding observations at the time of the incident is unacceptable and is not tolerated: A new version of the Trust's Therapeutic Observation Policy was implemented in 2015 with staff competency based training in the practical application of the policy. The policy is aimed at observing patients in relation t0 risk of harm, however does include assessment of physical wellbeing: All staff who carry out therapeutic observations are competency checked by a ward nurse or matron before they are allowed to lead on a patient's observations. This is applicable for all ward substantive and bank staff Further Action The nursing staff directly involved in this incident were subject t0 the Trust'$ Performance and Conduct Policy: As a result; the registered nurse involved has been dismissed and referred t0 the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC): The NMC investigation is still ongoing: The Healthcare Support Worker was also subject t0 disciplinary procedure and was also dismissed:. All missed observations should be reported through the incident reporting system and are subsequently reviewed by the relevant ward matron Responsible clinical staff involved in late or missed observations are interviewed and action taken where necessary. The Therapeutic Observation Policy will be reviewed by 30 April 2016 to consider how the completion of therapeutic observation for physical health concerns should be included or if separate guidance Is required: Fluid balance charts were not properly completed. There was no uniformity as to how or when staff would record fluid intake. Some staff would record fluid if they gave Mr Hughes a drink: Some would record if they witnessed Mr Hughes drink it Therefore, the fluid balance charts were rendered meaningless. Service Response The fluid balance chart in use across the Bradgate Unit was devised with the Dietetic service. There is also a Trust Nutrition and Hydration Policy explaining the standard of assessment and monitoring of patients food and fluid intake. However; the use of the fluid chart and the recording on the chart is not consistent by all staff and the service acknowledges the need for urgent Improvement in this area Further Action The lead Dietician for Adult Mental Health has been asked t0 review the fluid chart and its relationship to the Trust Hospital Nutrition and Hydration Policy: It is expected the review of the forms will be completed by the end of April 2016 and implementation will be supported by training t0 all clinical staff Chair: Cathy Ellis Chief Executive: Dr Peter Miller

3. Patient bedrooms are not fitted with a call bell system: The staff rely on patients being able to leave their bedroom and seek or be able to shout loudly enough to be heard. Clearly, a patient who is SO unwell that they can do neither would not be able to alert staff that assistance was required. Service Response There are currently 6 rooms identified for patients with physical disabilities in that have call bells in Mental Health Acute Inpatient Services. Traditional call bell systems are not appropriate for Mental Health areas (due t0 the ligature risks they present) , which means the Trust does not have call bells fitted to all Mental Health bedroom areas. However; the service is currently completing a review of appropriate options Further Action The service will conduct an appraisal and feasibility study to facilitate appropriate (individual patient) call-bell facilities by 31 July 2016. The preferred options will be presented t0 the Service Finance and Performance Committee by September 2016 for investment decision: During the interim period, increased observations levels will be set for those patients who present as physically unwell: The frequency of these observations will be agreed within the multi-disciplinary team and adjusted as required by clinical assessment; Bradgate Unit patients presenting with physical disabilities or Illness will be prioritised admission into our disabled or call-bell equipped bedrooms. The nursing staff who gave evidence were Registered Mental Health Nurses or Health Care Support Workers. The evidence that they gave suggested they may not appreciate the signs and symptoms of a physical problem lillness One nurse said that he would not: Although it is understood that discussions have taken place regarding the recruitment of 5 Registered General Nurses to supplement the 2 already in at the Bradgate Unit and address this concern, it Is understood that recruitment has not yet occurred and no date for commencement of recruitment could be given: Service Response Although mental health nurses do have training in basic physical healthcare the service acknowledges the benefits to patients of integrating additional General Nurses into each ward'$ multi-disciplinary team and it is the service'$ commitment t0 facilitate this Further Action Although the service has had two physical health lead nurses in post since July 2015, the service acknowledges the practical limitations of a limited sized team. The service has agreed to expand our general nurse team at the Bradgate and has consequently completed a cycle of recruitment into new posts. However, there were no applicants and a second cycle has commenced with a closing date in March 2016. It is acknowledged that Chalr: Cathy Ellis Chief Executve: Dr Miller help post Peter

nursing recruitment across all specialist areas is difficult at present and if there are no applicants again the service review this strategy and consider other workforce diversity options: We hope this reassures you that we have taken appropriate action in response to your findings in respect of individual staff concemed and the systems and processes supporting the Bradgate Unit's physical healthcare services to provide safe and effective care in order t0 reduce the risk to our future patients. Yours sincerelyi Dr Peter Miller Chief Executive Oisa0 Chalr: Cathy Ellis Chief Execulive: Dr Peter Miller will aou, 0
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power t0 take such action
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 23" April 2014 commenced an Investigation into the death of David Granville Oswald Hughes Cause of death Peritonitis Perforated duodenal ulcer
Circumstances of the Death
Mr. Hughes was a patient at the Bradgate Unit; Glenfield Hospital, Leicester. He had been admitted t0 the hospital on the 18"" April 2014 after the police had found him wandering the halls of a hotel and had classed him as vulnerable Whilst at the hospital Mr. Hughes refused t0 engage with staff and was placed on 15 minute observations that were t0 check that he was safe and well; These observalions do not include physical observations such as blood pressure; pulse and respirations but were t0 be conducted by properly checking Mr Hughes and engaging him at each prescribed interval Mr. Hughes was t0 have physical observations taken as part of his admission but he continued t0 refuse t0 have Ihis taken and medical evidence Is that he had the capacity t0 make this decision Mr: Hughes was found unresponsive lying on his bedroom floor collapsed at approximately 02.00 hours on the 23r April 2014 tiS clear from the evidence Ihat there were serious fallings in his care in s0 far as he was not obsenved in accordance with his medical needs However, medical evidence is that (here were no physical signs that Mr; Hughes was unwell such that action could have been taken t0 prevent his death: Therefore , while the recording of his observations fell way short of an acceptable standard_this failure did not cause or contribute tQ his death
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

CDI patient observations records
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Missed and inaccurate patient observations
Recording of routine observations
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Missed and inaccurate patient observations

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.