Alwyn Head
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2016-0115
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 19 May 2016
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
19 May 2016
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner's Concerns AI summary
Failures included not establishing MRSA history, withholding prophylactic antibiotics, lacking a post-operative wound care plan, and providing meaningless wound documentation, compromising patient safety.
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Ms Harding Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths: Alwyn Ann Head ("the Report") refer to your Report issued following the inquest pertaining to Alwyn Head and reporting the circumstances of the death to me, pursuant to Regulation 28 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. The Trust has sent a letter of apology to Mrs Head's family and has offered to meet with them to discuss the circumstances of her death, and the actions taken by the Trust as part of our coronial investigation process. A full investigation was carried out following Mrs Head's death and a copy of the actions from that investigation are provided to you within this response (Appendix 1). can confirm that lessons have been learnt and the Trust has changed its practice to minimise the chance of any other family having the same experience will address the specific issues that you identified in your Report of 23 March 2016, as follows: That Mrs Head had a history of MRSA that was not established to surgery despite opportunities in 3 different hospital departments to obtain this information from Mrs Head or her family. We acknowledge that although Mrs Head had a history of MRSA this was not established prior to the surgical procedure. We have therefore introduced a series of measures to reduce the risk of this situation re-occurring, which are: New admission/transfer assessment documentation of patient infection status was introduced in April 2016. Staff are made aware of the new documentation on the twice monthly level 3 infection control update sessions_ As part of their daily routine patient reviews the infection control team are checking the new documentation has been completed and provide the nursing staff with feedback at the time Delivering high quality healthcare An Associate Teaching Hospital; of the Universily of London WWW ~mecwaymaritimehospital.nhs Uk prior
2- LDImjc 18 April 2016 The outcome of the patient reviews are reported monthly and areas of poor compliance will receive additional support from the infection control team: The new documentation will be incorporated into a new nursing patient assessment / care planning document which is due to be implemented in July 2016_ Prophylactic Teicoplanin was not provided pre or post operatively even though the results of the MRSA Screen would not have been available at the time of the surgery (MRSA ~ve written on pre-op form erroneously) We have recognised the importance of ensuring that MRSA status is checked and appropriate antibiotic regime applied: The orthopaedic antimicrobial guidelines have been updated to provide more clarity over the prophylaxis for patients with unknown MRSA status The surgical safety checklist is amended to ensure MRSA status and MRSA is verified by two staff and with the patient pre operatively in the Anaesthetic Room before induction and again with the whole theatre team at 'sign in'.
3. A post-operative wound care plan was not instituted contrary to NICE guidelines and
4. There was no evidence of the surgical wound having been inspected by nursing staff or doctors between 13th August and 25th August 2015 and
5. Entries in the nursing notes relating to dressing and wound were meaningless and would not assist a determination of whether there was deterioration in the wound_ We are updating our tissue viability policy and associated standard operating procedures (SOPs) to include NICE guidance and standards for post-operative surgical wound management: Wound care documentation, care plans and wound assessment standards have all been reviewed. The wound care documentation will be incorporated into the new nursing assessment / care planning document in July 2016. The documentation and standards will be presented to the Trust Patient Safety Group and the Nursing & Midwifery Quality Forum. Directorate representatives will be responsible for cascading the information through their Directorate_ Compliance with the policies and SOPs will be monitored as part of our established assurance audits Results of audits are presented at Patient Safety Group which has responsibility for monitoring compliance in this area and the Nursing & Midwifery Quality Forum. In addition, the recognition and management of Sepsis and the Deteriorating Patient are priorities for the Trust, A programme of work has commenced which aims to improve patient safety, outcomes and reduce the incidence of deterioration and sepsis, through early recognition and timely response_ Summary of actions: Ward to Board rounds to assess and monitor patients' conditions more regularly Deteriorating Patient Programme commenced in January 2016 which includes three work streams
1. Recognise 2. Respond, 3. Data Quality A multi-disciplinary Sepsis Action group is in place which monitors performance against the Sepsis six bundle, the National CQUIN performance and sepsis mortality. The Trust has provided feedback to the NICE consultation on the proposed new Sepsis Guidance (due to be published in July 2016). Delivering high quality heallhcare An Associate Teaching Hospital; of (he University of London WWW meclwaymaritimehospital nhsuk being History key key
LDlmjc 18 April 2016 Trust representation at the Sepsis Nurse Forum: Monthly auditing against the Sepsis bundle A robust Education and Training programme in place Learning events have commenced across the Trust The Standardised Mortality Ratio for patients with a primary diagnosis of Septicaemia is currently the lowest it has been in the last two year period: This reflects the work undertaken currently: The learning from our investigation into Mrs Head's death has been shared with the specific ward and also Trust wide. hope you will agree that the learning points have been acted upon, and the actions developed following Mrs Head's death continue to be actively and robustly implemented and reviewed ' Although we know that we will never eliminate risk completely, the action plan will continue to be addressed and monitored via the Trust's Governance processes to ensure that we reduce our risks to the lowest level possible_ We apologise unreservedly to Mrs Head's family for distress and anxiety caused by us
2- LDImjc 18 April 2016 The outcome of the patient reviews are reported monthly and areas of poor compliance will receive additional support from the infection control team: The new documentation will be incorporated into a new nursing patient assessment / care planning document which is due to be implemented in July 2016_ Prophylactic Teicoplanin was not provided pre or post operatively even though the results of the MRSA Screen would not have been available at the time of the surgery (MRSA ~ve written on pre-op form erroneously) We have recognised the importance of ensuring that MRSA status is checked and appropriate antibiotic regime applied: The orthopaedic antimicrobial guidelines have been updated to provide more clarity over the prophylaxis for patients with unknown MRSA status The surgical safety checklist is amended to ensure MRSA status and MRSA is verified by two staff and with the patient pre operatively in the Anaesthetic Room before induction and again with the whole theatre team at 'sign in'.
3. A post-operative wound care plan was not instituted contrary to NICE guidelines and
4. There was no evidence of the surgical wound having been inspected by nursing staff or doctors between 13th August and 25th August 2015 and
5. Entries in the nursing notes relating to dressing and wound were meaningless and would not assist a determination of whether there was deterioration in the wound_ We are updating our tissue viability policy and associated standard operating procedures (SOPs) to include NICE guidance and standards for post-operative surgical wound management: Wound care documentation, care plans and wound assessment standards have all been reviewed. The wound care documentation will be incorporated into the new nursing assessment / care planning document in July 2016. The documentation and standards will be presented to the Trust Patient Safety Group and the Nursing & Midwifery Quality Forum. Directorate representatives will be responsible for cascading the information through their Directorate_ Compliance with the policies and SOPs will be monitored as part of our established assurance audits Results of audits are presented at Patient Safety Group which has responsibility for monitoring compliance in this area and the Nursing & Midwifery Quality Forum. In addition, the recognition and management of Sepsis and the Deteriorating Patient are priorities for the Trust, A programme of work has commenced which aims to improve patient safety, outcomes and reduce the incidence of deterioration and sepsis, through early recognition and timely response_ Summary of actions: Ward to Board rounds to assess and monitor patients' conditions more regularly Deteriorating Patient Programme commenced in January 2016 which includes three work streams
1. Recognise 2. Respond, 3. Data Quality A multi-disciplinary Sepsis Action group is in place which monitors performance against the Sepsis six bundle, the National CQUIN performance and sepsis mortality. The Trust has provided feedback to the NICE consultation on the proposed new Sepsis Guidance (due to be published in July 2016). Delivering high quality heallhcare An Associate Teaching Hospital; of (he University of London WWW meclwaymaritimehospital nhsuk being History key key
LDlmjc 18 April 2016 Trust representation at the Sepsis Nurse Forum: Monthly auditing against the Sepsis bundle A robust Education and Training programme in place Learning events have commenced across the Trust The Standardised Mortality Ratio for patients with a primary diagnosis of Septicaemia is currently the lowest it has been in the last two year period: This reflects the work undertaken currently: The learning from our investigation into Mrs Head's death has been shared with the specific ward and also Trust wide. hope you will agree that the learning points have been acted upon, and the actions developed following Mrs Head's death continue to be actively and robustly implemented and reviewed ' Although we know that we will never eliminate risk completely, the action plan will continue to be addressed and monitored via the Trust's Governance processes to ensure that we reduce our risks to the lowest level possible_ We apologise unreservedly to Mrs Head's family for distress and anxiety caused by us
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe your organisation has the power to take such action.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 2"d September 2015 commenced an investigation into the death of Ann Head, 70 years The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 21s March 2016. The conclusion of the inquest was that Alwyn Ann Head died from a recognised complication of a consented and necessary procedure
Circumstances of the Death
Head was admitted to Medway Maritime Hospital on 10th August 2015 following two falls in which she fractured her left femur at the site f a prosthesis which had been previously placed in Belgium following a similar fracture after a fall. She underwent surgery and approx: 12 days post-operatively a wound infection was noted which was later determined to be MRSA_ She was given antibiotics the following day and two days later underwent a debridement and washoutShe deteriorated post-operatively requiring increasing inotropic support: She died on 20"h August 2015
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Priority attendance at IPC meetings
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Care home infection control
Service change continuity plans
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Care and discharge planning
Unannounced inspections with lay representation
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Care home infection control
Senior manager clinical visits
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Care home infection control
Cohorting only exceptional
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Care home infection control
IPC clinical governance meetings
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Care home infection control
Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Care home infection control
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.