Mr Richards previous medical history included diagnoses of depression; and anxiety, for which he was treated at various times pharmacologically, by inpatient treatment in a secure hospital, by access to the Home Treatment Team and by community based mental health care. His history included self-harm and suicide attempt His anxieties included financial worry, debt; unemployment and eviction: He attended A&E at Whipps Cross Hospital on July 2016 for treatment of pain in his right loin. Whilst there he was X-rayed to the chest; which revealed a "shadow" on the right side The hospital advised Mr Richards and his sister who attended with him that this matter would be raised with the GP and he was informed that the hospital recommended follow-up in the chest clinic. The discharge summary recorded "disch for GP to check progress" and also specifically noted the clinician's comments which included "please arrange FIU in the chest clinic" . A letter was given to the patient as well as emailed to the GP surgery: The_initial GP evidential witness report to the Coroner_prepared for submission 23rd _ FIUp to the Inquest, made no mention of this event: heard evidence that the usual surgery protocol was that a reviewing doctor would assess all emailed reports received into the surgery , and in a case like this would instruct the surgery receptionist to contact the patient to arrange an appointment for such follow-up to be actioned. The evidence was that this did not happen. There was no follow-up. When Mr Richards was next seen in surgery on 5th October 2016,the X-rays were not discussed and there was no discussion of the requested follow-up by either the doctor; Mr Richards or his sister: The evidence was that Mr Richards was thought to be alarmed at the prospect that he might have lung cancer; from which his mother had died, and it was possible that this anxiety played a part in the prolongation or exacerbation of his depression leading to his suicide Additionally, evidence was given that in the course of a Root Cause Serious Incident Investigation conducted by an independent panel at the behest of the mental health authority (North East London Foundation Trust) that documents were sent electronically by fax from agencies of the Trust, especially the home treatment team andlor the Redbridge Access and Assessment Brief Intervention Team, which the GP surgery did not act upon although the Trust had received successful transmission reports generated by the fax machine: The features of: a) failure to act upon the request in the A&E discharge summary; b) failure to have a contingency system or audit in place to ensure that such failures are not missed; c) failure to include reference to the attendance at A&E and the discharge summary generated as a result of it;, in the GP evidential report; d) and failure to act on fax documents sent to the surgery, all indicate a want of management control, lack of suitable procedures in place and a poor attention to documents received.