Peter Thompson
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2026-0018
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 10 Mar 2026
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
10 Mar 2026
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
1. Worsening blood sugar levels in a resident with Type 2 Diabetes can be fatal. Illnesses including infection can cause the progressive condition of Hyperglycaemic Hyperosmolar State. This is what happened with Peter Thompson. No one tested his blood sugar levels until the paramedics attended on 5 March 2025. By this time his condition was so severe his prognosis was poor and he did not recover despite treatment. I heard evidence that the earlier treatment is started the better the prognosis. I heard evidence from members of the Ageing Well Team and the Community Nurse that there was an expectation that Care Home staff were carrying out the blood sugar pin prick test. The former manager of the home said that Care Home staff do not do this and do not have the equipment to do this. This test is not complex. It is a test that a resident or a carer would do in their own home. It would form part of a baseline observation for a Type 2 Diabetic patinet who was ill and assist with decision on need to escalate. The continued absence of this test being done by care home staff gives cause for concern that there is a risk that a future death could occur.
2. I heard evidence from the former manager that handovers between shifts do not take place. That staff should look in an individual residents' records. Records do not provide a complete picture of a residents condition and in particular details of staff's ongoing concerns. The priority of the continuing concern about Peter's deterioration does not appear from the records to have been handed over between shifts. To not have a formal handover at the end and start of a shift gives cause for concern that there is a risk to future death. That delays are caused in escalating a resident's condition.
2. I heard evidence from the former manager that handovers between shifts do not take place. That staff should look in an individual residents' records. Records do not provide a complete picture of a residents condition and in particular details of staff's ongoing concerns. The priority of the continuing concern about Peter's deterioration does not appear from the records to have been handed over between shifts. To not have a formal handover at the end and start of a shift gives cause for concern that there is a risk to future death. That delays are caused in escalating a resident's condition.
Responses
Bank Close House has strengthened documentation expectations for handovers and instructed staff to immediately request blood glucose tests from external professionals for ill diabetic residents. Blood glucose monitoring equipment is now on site and staff complete diabetes awareness training, though specific training for care staff to perform tests is awaiting external confirmation.
AI summary
View full response
Response to Coroner RE: Peter Thompson Thank you for the RegulaƟon 28 Report dated 13 January 2026. We take the findings extremely seriously and are commiƩed to implemenƟng all necessary measures to safeguard residents and prevent future deaths. Our response addresses the concerns raised regarding handover processes and blood glucose monitoring for diabeƟc residents.
1. Handover Processes Bank Close House has always operated a structured handover system between every shiŌ. This includes:
• A face to face handover meeƟng at the end and start of each shiŌ.
• A wriƩen daily handover sheet, completed for every shiŌ, summarising key observaƟons, concerns, and updates for each resident.
• An electronic handover record on PCS, which complements the wriƩen notes and provides a digital record of ongoing care needs, changes in condiƟon, and escalaƟon acƟons. The wriƩen daily handover sheet explicitly directs staff to review digital notes on PCS, ensuring that all staff have access to a complete and up to date picture of each resident’s condiƟon. Samples of both the wriƩen and electronic handover formats have been provided. It is important to note that the former manager was present at these handovers every day, parƟcipaƟng in and overseeing the exchange of informaƟon between shiŌs. This ensured that concerns, changes in condiƟon, and ongoing issues were discussed verbally in addiƟon to being recorded. We acknowledge the coroner’s concern that the records reviewed during the inquest did not fully reflect the level of discussion or the priority of concerns during handover. In response, we have strengthened documentaƟon expectaƟons to ensure that all verbal handover informaƟon is consistently and accurately recorded.
2. Blood Glucose Monitoring for DiabeƟc Residents The coroner’s report states that Bank Close House should be carrying out blood glucose tesƟng for diabeƟc residents. Historically, the home has been advised by both the Ageing Well Team and the GP PracƟce Advanced Nurse PracƟƟoner that care home staff should not undertake blood glucose tesƟng. This guidance has been consistent and shaped our pracƟce, please see aƩached care plans with entries added in with instrucƟons from ageing well team. Following the coroner’s findings:
• The Ageing Well Team has now supplied blood glucose monitoring machines for all diabeƟc residents.
• They remain uncertain about who will be responsible for delivering the required training and competency assessments for care home staff.
• We are awaiƟng formal confirmaƟon from external healthcare professionals so that we can implement blood glucose tesƟng safely and in line with clinical governance requirements.
UnƟl staff are trained and signed off as competent, all concerns regarding a diabeƟc resident’s health will conƟnue to be escalated to external professionals, who will carry out blood glucose tesƟng as needed.
3. Lessons Learned The incident has highlighted several important learning points:
• Despite mulƟple visits and telephone conversaƟons with District Nurses and the Advanced Nurse PracƟƟoner in the days prior to hospital admission, no blood glucose test was taken or recommended by any external professionals unƟl the day of admission. As an interim measure, staff have been instructed that any concerns about a diabeƟc resident’s health must include a request for a blood glucose test from external healthcare professionals unƟl training and competencies are completed by care staff.
4. AcƟons Implemented to Prevent Recurrence The following acƟons have been taken:
• GP surgeries have been asked to provide each diabeƟc resident’s HbA1c level, ensuring staff have baseline informaƟon about long term glucose control.
• Staff have been instructed to request a blood glucose test immediately from external professionals if a diabeƟc resident shows signs of illness, infecƟon, reduced intake, or any other concerning change.
• Blood glucose monitoring equipment has been provided by the Ageing Well Team and is now on site, however We are sƟll awaiƟng confirmaƟon of:
• who will deliver blood glucose tesƟng training,
• what competencies will be required,
• and what the ongoing expectaƟons will be for care home staff. Training will be implemented immediately once this informaƟon is provided.
5. Outcome and Ongoing Monitoring All staff complete diabetes awareness training, ensuring they understand the risks associated with illness, dehydraƟon, and hyperglycaemic emergencies. We are currently awaiƟng:
• formal training in blood glucose tesƟng,
• competency assessments,
• and clear guidance from external medical professionals regarding expectaƟons and clinical governance. UnƟl this is provided, we will conƟnue to escalate all diabeƟc health concerns to external clinicians for blood glucose tesƟng. Further monitoring and review will conƟnue unƟl the training pathway and responsibiliƟes are formally confirmed.
1. Handover Processes Bank Close House has always operated a structured handover system between every shiŌ. This includes:
• A face to face handover meeƟng at the end and start of each shiŌ.
• A wriƩen daily handover sheet, completed for every shiŌ, summarising key observaƟons, concerns, and updates for each resident.
• An electronic handover record on PCS, which complements the wriƩen notes and provides a digital record of ongoing care needs, changes in condiƟon, and escalaƟon acƟons. The wriƩen daily handover sheet explicitly directs staff to review digital notes on PCS, ensuring that all staff have access to a complete and up to date picture of each resident’s condiƟon. Samples of both the wriƩen and electronic handover formats have been provided. It is important to note that the former manager was present at these handovers every day, parƟcipaƟng in and overseeing the exchange of informaƟon between shiŌs. This ensured that concerns, changes in condiƟon, and ongoing issues were discussed verbally in addiƟon to being recorded. We acknowledge the coroner’s concern that the records reviewed during the inquest did not fully reflect the level of discussion or the priority of concerns during handover. In response, we have strengthened documentaƟon expectaƟons to ensure that all verbal handover informaƟon is consistently and accurately recorded.
2. Blood Glucose Monitoring for DiabeƟc Residents The coroner’s report states that Bank Close House should be carrying out blood glucose tesƟng for diabeƟc residents. Historically, the home has been advised by both the Ageing Well Team and the GP PracƟce Advanced Nurse PracƟƟoner that care home staff should not undertake blood glucose tesƟng. This guidance has been consistent and shaped our pracƟce, please see aƩached care plans with entries added in with instrucƟons from ageing well team. Following the coroner’s findings:
• The Ageing Well Team has now supplied blood glucose monitoring machines for all diabeƟc residents.
• They remain uncertain about who will be responsible for delivering the required training and competency assessments for care home staff.
• We are awaiƟng formal confirmaƟon from external healthcare professionals so that we can implement blood glucose tesƟng safely and in line with clinical governance requirements.
UnƟl staff are trained and signed off as competent, all concerns regarding a diabeƟc resident’s health will conƟnue to be escalated to external professionals, who will carry out blood glucose tesƟng as needed.
3. Lessons Learned The incident has highlighted several important learning points:
• Despite mulƟple visits and telephone conversaƟons with District Nurses and the Advanced Nurse PracƟƟoner in the days prior to hospital admission, no blood glucose test was taken or recommended by any external professionals unƟl the day of admission. As an interim measure, staff have been instructed that any concerns about a diabeƟc resident’s health must include a request for a blood glucose test from external healthcare professionals unƟl training and competencies are completed by care staff.
4. AcƟons Implemented to Prevent Recurrence The following acƟons have been taken:
• GP surgeries have been asked to provide each diabeƟc resident’s HbA1c level, ensuring staff have baseline informaƟon about long term glucose control.
• Staff have been instructed to request a blood glucose test immediately from external professionals if a diabeƟc resident shows signs of illness, infecƟon, reduced intake, or any other concerning change.
• Blood glucose monitoring equipment has been provided by the Ageing Well Team and is now on site, however We are sƟll awaiƟng confirmaƟon of:
• who will deliver blood glucose tesƟng training,
• what competencies will be required,
• and what the ongoing expectaƟons will be for care home staff. Training will be implemented immediately once this informaƟon is provided.
5. Outcome and Ongoing Monitoring All staff complete diabetes awareness training, ensuring they understand the risks associated with illness, dehydraƟon, and hyperglycaemic emergencies. We are currently awaiƟng:
• formal training in blood glucose tesƟng,
• competency assessments,
• and clear guidance from external medical professionals regarding expectaƟons and clinical governance. UnƟl this is provided, we will conƟnue to escalate all diabeƟc health concerns to external clinicians for blood glucose tesƟng. Further monitoring and review will conƟnue unƟl the training pathway and responsibiliƟes are formally confirmed.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 21 March 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Peter William THOMPSON aged 77. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 13 January 2026. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Peter William Thompson was admitted into Chesterfiled Royal Hospital on 5 March 2025 with a significantly high blood sugar level and a recent history of infection, reduced food and fluid intake and refusal to take medication. He was treated for Hyperglyceamic Hyperosmoal State. Whilst he initially responded to the treatment due to the severity of his kidney damage caused by progressive deyhdration his prognosis remained poor. The day after he was admitted his bloods showed rising sodium levels and signs of acidosis. Due to his fraility and the severity of his condition intensive treatment was not recommended. He was placed on palliative care and passed away on 9 March 2025. Peter had been diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes since 2001. This had been managed with medication. Due to his worsening health after having fallen and fractured his hip he moved into residential care at the end of 2024. At the end of February 2025 he became ill and developed a urinary tract infection. He continued to deteriorate and there were missed opportunities between 28 February 2025 and 5 March 2025 to test his blood sugar levels and identify them to be increasing. Had such tests been done by 3 March 2025 Peter would have been admitted to hospital for treatment and treatment started. The delay in admission to hospital and starting treatment has more than minimally contributed to Peter’s death.
Circumstances of the Death
Peter Thompson was diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes in 2001. At the end of 2024 he moved into Bank House Residential Care Home because of his worsened mobility following a fall and fracturing his hip. His diabetes was controlled with medication and managing his diet. His blood sugars were regularly checked by his GP. When he moved to Bank House his GP practice changed. He became ill at the end of February 2025 with a urinary tract infection. He was prescribed antibiotics in solution form. His other medication was not in liquid form. He was not eating and had swallowing difficulties causing him to pool his food and medication. He started to refuse medication. His health deteriorated. His blood sugars were not tested. His illness caused a recogonised complication of Type 2 Diabetes - Hyperglyceamic Hyperosmolar State. This was due to infection causing increasing blood sugar levels. This caused kidney damage. On 5 March 2025 the Community Nurse attended for a regular review of his skin wounds and found his to be in a critical state. She called 999. The paramedics attended. They tested his blood sugars with the pin prick and found these to be significantly high. He was admitted to hospital. However, his condition was so severe he could not recover despite treatment. He died in hospital 4 days later.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Quarterly assessment of staffing levels against population needs
Brook House Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
Ensure senior manager presence and accessibility to staff
Brook House Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
Responsibility for regulating and monitoring compliance
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
NHS Litigation Authority Improvement of risk management
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.