Mary Bloom

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2015-0417
Date of Report 30 October 2015
Coroner Nadia Persaud
Coroner Area East London
Response Deadline est. 25 December 2015
All 1 response received · Deadline: 25 Dec 2015
Response Status
Responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 25 Dec 2015
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner's Concerns
There was a failure to comply with the Trust's policy relating to the administration of heparin, by to weigh Mrs Bloom prior to commencing the infusion of heparin: There was a failure to consult a haematologist before the infusion of heparin in view of Mrs Blooms' low weight of 30 kilograms Again, this is required by the Trust policy. It was not possible to take baseline bloods before the commencement of heparin, however; attempts should have been made to retake bloods after hydration had commenced: The Trust policy requires baseline bloods to be taken and for the APTT to be checked after 6 hours The consultant haematologist who gave evidence from the Trust confirmed that he should have been consulted, the weight should have been clearly recorded and bloods should have been attempted post-hydration: He agreed that a specially tailored administration of heparin form, requiring the documentation of the patient's weight and APTT ratio would improve the safe administration of the drug: The poster for the administration of heparin include a direction that: An obesel/underweight patient who weigh over 131 kilograms and under 40 kilograms should be treated on an individual basis. Please seek haematology advice. This direction is written in very small writing at the bottom of the heparin administration poster: It appears to have been missed by 2 doctors involved in the prescribing of heparin to Mrs Bloom: There is concern that this may have been missed as it was not sufficiently visible on the poster:
Responses
Response
Response received
View full response
Dear Nadia, Thank you for your letter dated &th December 2015 with regards to some outstanding concerns that you have raised in relation to the inquest of Mary Catherine Bloom that resulted in a Regulation 28 served to the Trust in November 2015 In your letter you acknowledge receipt of three new policies that have been put in place by the Trust following the inquest and the new chart that has been introduced for the administration of unfractionated heparin. You have however raised further concerns with regards to the new Trust guidelines that have removed the requirement for a haematologist to be consulted where a patient is at the extremes of weight: The reasoning for this decision is as follows The Trust'$ new policy is for a weight based bolus and then a weight based infusion the latter within weight ranges: Even with a patient of the infusion would be at 2Oiu/kg/hr which is a very reasonable infusion rate and in line with recognised dosage rates even at this weight: APPTR must be checked at 6hours and this allows the dose to be adjusted within recognised time intervals. We therefore feel that the safeguards are in place as we have moved to an entirely weight based formulation. As an extra safeguard the guideline, following the concerns vou raised, now also states that if the APTTR at 6hrs is outside the expected range then the Consultant Haematologist should be contacted for further advice in those patients at the extreme ends of the weight ranges i.e. <41kg and >90kg: that this provides you with the assurance that you require and that can look forward to hearing from you to confirm that this regulation 28 has now been closed.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 27/h February 2014 commenced an investigation into the death of Mary Catherine Bloom_ The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 30"h October 2015. The conclusion of the Inquest was a short form conclusion of natural causes_
Circumstances of the Death
Catherine Bloom suffered from dementia: There was a 12 month history of cognitive decline reduced oral intake. She was admitted to Queens Hospital on the 3r4 February 2014 with a history of 3 weeks of significantly reduced oral intake and rapid change in her left leg over 4 hours that morning: The initial impression was that Mrs Bloom was suffering from probable ischemia in the leg, hypovolemia and general decline_ She was admitted under the care of the vascular surgical team: The plan in place was for her to receive intravenous fluids, antibiotics and heparin: She was not considered to be a candidate for surgery. The heparin was not expected to reverse the thrombosis but to prevent further deterioration: loading dose of 500Ounits of heparin was administered at 17:40 and an infusion of 20,000 units put up at 18.30. Mrs Bloom's weight was not recorded prior to the administration of heparin or at all her admission. The infusion rate was not calculated on the basis of her weight; as it should have been: The Trust policy requires baseline bloods to be taken and then APTT ratios to be checked 6 hours Baseline bloods were not taken, as bloods were haemolysing in A & E also haemolysed when an attempt was made by the surgical registrar. There was no attempt to repeat bloods after hydration had commenced. There was no consultation with the consultant haematologist in view of Mrs Bloom's very low weight of 30 kilograms: The haematologist is likely to have advised a reduced loading dose and a reduced infusion rate. Mrs Bloom was admitted to the ward at 20.00 hours and was noted to have a reduced blood pressure at 21.50. The nurse caring for her also questioned the possibility of melena: A doctor attended the ward to review Mrs Bloom and considered that the drop in blood pressure was due to dehydration: Fluids that had been written up previously were not ongoing and therefore_he re-sited the cannula and advised that fluids be recommenced at a slightly Mary and during every They increased rate_ At around 23.45 the nurse caring for Bloom noted that her condition was deteriorating: She was noted to have passed away at 00.50 on the 4"h February 2014. CPR was not attempted as a DNAR order had been put into place by the consultant in charge of her care. There was no discussion with the next of kin to placing the DNAR order in her notes. The pathologist who carried out the post-mortem examination did not find any evidence of bleeding and did not consider that excessive administration of heparin had contributed to Mrs Bloom's death: The pathologist gave a cause of death 1a dementia and Il coronary artery atheroma; mitral valve disease and acute limb ischaemia
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Drug Prescription Documentation
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Pharmacist missed drug contraindications
Medicines administration
Mid Staffs Inquiry
MAR chart errors

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.