Amy Chiverall

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2021-0178
Date of Report 14 April 2021
Coroner Joanne Kearsley
Coroner Area Manchester North
Response Deadline est. 22 July 2021
All 1 response received · Deadline: 22 Jul 2021
Sent To
Response Status
Responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 22 Jul 2021
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner's Concerns
_ The Court heard the home do not use pendant call alarms_ This was described as a business decision: The Home has 18 residents of mixed falls risk but less than half would be of a moderate or high risk of falls. The Court was concerned that for those residents a fixed call bell may not be of assistance, as in this case, as it would be out of reach when required: ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe each of you respectively have the power to take such action_ YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely 10/07/2021. the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action_ Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. July

COPIES and PUBLICATION have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namely: The family of Mrs Chiverall am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response_ The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary from: He send a copY of this report to any person who he believes may find it usefulor of interest You may make representations to me the coroner at the time of your response, about the-telease or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner Date: VLRA Signed (oaxtoxd may
Responses
Rochcare
The response text is largely unreadable due to severe formatting issues. However, it appears to describe the home's current practices regarding risk assessments and the use of fixed call bells, suggesting that the existing system is considered adequate for most residents who can mobilize independently. AI summary
View full response
Re-erer- ynce Inl} Ijo ' death cotodr nite Iene420 number ol procerei ntludirt Stalnreroid'Sepn Msinate Jintenej (EcuruKee dinn lrainna The proze:i C cruring ItamancrJnd unoeritand polcica Noi chjocco Flash "remnes Include Incideres Inal navr Oc(uted_#ndrenal r Dena tolloted Up The curtent manjret nai recordneepinaund poatally Intarmatjn Holsinl Ji Ine 047 Induds: Hloldet ntledFully preventic DrorsoRhai relevan: Jase*smenta sulomem Care neediund checki (Careiion] alang with flla po €Y past tlli tco Hoena-Fer lpalnit nava taen Inttaled Inuoethe rennt In Vio AheAnlya-(cu poinbs allov prcplc to /re Ine c4ll bcllal ac heo Lhe perjon; rotito te Nror [nost Eeop < Wno mobllise inucpendenthy undnave t4patity Dut dre 08 risk Ofalis; [ney Can VeJr Ihe call bcll ta jumnon help when (qqulred Chai Kiafm eainaay ducn orostem;Fhmrg#mat [O Mijeinatr4i lolndrnen Lomcone und Up Pledietct MeanotIlcaunavaanv Dthel Auct ici In ueallontothr AAi happy ta Kelp; Kurc Rasuerds; Rocne Hcuse 6,77 Diake SMEE1 Rocndale Larcs 0116 180 KRocheiro com
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Pressure damage risk assessment
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Falls prevention plans

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.