Drew Greaves-Pimblett

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2026-0008
Date of Report 8 January 2026
Coroner Anita Bhardwaj
Response Deadline est. 5 March 2026
All 1 response received · Deadline: 5 Mar 2026
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
National telephone triage pathways lack adequate guidance for call handlers on probing questions for critical symptoms like breathing and body temperature, hindering accurate assessment for CPR.
View full coroner's concerns
Though a telephone triage is always challenging and subjective, there appears to be a gap in the national pathways for call handlers. Consideration as to further guidance and assistance to call handlers on probing questioning for fundamental aspects such as breathing and where and how to best assess how cold the body is. If someone is not breathing to ask how they know and/or techniques such as head to the chest, where to take a pulse etc. for the call handler to make a more informed decision as to whether someone is breathing and if CPR is required. When a call is made to NWAS, often it is by someone not thinking straight and so specific questions on breathing and general presentation may be of assistance in assessing the call.
Responses
NHS England NHS / Health Body
8 Jan 2026
Noted
NHS England acknowledges the concerns and notes that the North West Ambulance Service followed protocol, but also outlines national work taking place around Reports to Prevent Future Deaths, ensuring learnings are shared across the NHS. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Coroner, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Drew John Greaves- Pimblett who died on 22nd March 2025.

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 8th January 2026 concerning the death of Drew John Greaves-Pimblett on 22nd March
2025. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Drew’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Drew’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.

Your Report raised concerns that there is a gap in national pathways for call handlers. You asked for consideration to be given to further guidance and assistance for call handlers on probing questioning for fundamental aspects such as for breathing and general presentation (e.g. how best to assess how cold a body is and where to take a pulse), so that call handlers can make more informed decisions as to whether someone is breathing and if CPR is required.

Regional Response NHS England’s Regional North West Team have liaised with the North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) regarding your Report. They have advised that when Drew was found not breathing and unresponsive, a 999 call was made to NWAS. The caller stated he was blue, had swollen lips, was very cold and not breathing. The call was initially categorised as a Category 1, the highest level of ambulance response, but was then downgraded to a Category 4 following responses to further questions asked (note that one of the outcomes on NHS Pathways for a person who is clearly deceased is a Category 4 response, and where death is not expected this can be onward referred to the police). The police were notified of the unexpected death, attended within 30 minutes and stated that Drew was blue and unresponsive but was slightly warm, and therefore they started CPR – the police documented that pressing Drew’s chest was very difficult. NWAS were called again and arrived within 2 minutes of the police officer arriving at the scene. National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

3 March 2026

The attending NWAS clinician completed an assessment and confirmed that Drew had passed away. He stated when asked that Drew was very cold. NWAS audited the call after the event and did find that there had been some deviation and the need for more probing before the downgrade, which resulted in the ambulance being stood down, with feedback given at the time to the NWAS call handler on this. NHS England was not a party to the inquest, but has been informed that the Coroner accepted all of the evidence and concluded that it was more likely than not that Drew had been deceased for some time before NWAS’s arrival.

National Position Background NHS Ambulance Services are required to process 999 calls through an approved triage system. There are currently two long established systems approved in England for primary 999 triage; NHS Pathways and the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS). The systems are used to prioritise 999 calls received into Ambulance Services’ Emergency Operations Centres (EOCs). The North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) uses the NHS Pathways system. The primary purpose of triage is to quickly identify priority symptoms (e.g. unconsciousness, difficulty breathing, chest pain) and to assign an appropriate response priority. The outcome (disposition) reached based on the information provided by the caller is mapped to one of the five national categories (Categories 1 –
5) set out within the NHS Constitution and Ambulance Service 999 contracts. The development of triage question sets and instructions lies within the remit of the triage system provider. NHS Pathways Background NHS Pathways is the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) used for remote clinical assessment (triage) in urgent and emergency care. In use since 2005, it underpins all NHS 111 services and more than half of England’s 999 telephony services. It is also used for self-service triage via NHS 111 online and at the front door of Emergency Departments. The product is owned by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and is manufactured and managed by the Transformation Directorate of NHS England. The tool also supports enhanced clinical assessments via modules such as the NHS Pathways Clinical Consultation Support (PaCCS) system. The safety of NHS Pathways triage outcomes - known as "dispositions" - is overseen by the National Clinical Assurance Group (NCAG), an independent intercollegiate body hosted by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC). Alongside this independent oversight, NHS Pathways aligns its clinical content and assessment protocols with up-to-date national clinical guidance, including from NICE (the National

Institute for Health and Care Excellence), the UK Resuscitation Council and the UK Sepsis Trust, amongst others. The system supports over 2.5 million triage assessments each month across telephone, digital, and face-to-face settings. NHS Pathways follows a structured clinical hierarchy. Serious and potentially life- threatening symptoms are assessed first to ensure rapid escalation - such as dispatching an ambulance or involving a clinician. The assessment then progresses through to less urgent symptoms, identifying the most appropriate level of care. Principles of Health Advisor Training In telephone settings (calls made to NHS 111 or 999), assessments are conducted by specially trained non-clinical health advisors. These advisors complete a comprehensive, structured mandatory training programme to ensure they can use the NHS Pathways algorithm safely and effectively, and they are always supported by clinicians, as a condition of the NHS Pathways licence, which NHS 111 and 999 providers must enter into in order to use the system. If a case is complex or unclear, health advisors are required to escalate to clinical colleagues. The NHS Pathways licence states that clinical supervision and escalation support must be available 24/7, and immediately accessible to health advisors during live calls. This clinical availability is a core system control. Following the initial core role preparation training, health advisors and clinicians are required to update their training every 12 weeks. They are also able to access a comprehensive library of additional training courses and educational resources such as ‘Hot Topics’, case studies and e-learning packages. NHS Pathways Assessment of Consciousness and Breathing Based on the information provided regarding this particular case, in respect of the NHS Pathways triage system we can confirm the following:
• If a cardiac arrest is not suspected at the onset of the call, the system seeks to quickly establish whether there is an immediate threat to life. If the patient is not fitting or choking, supporting information is provided to the health advisor to assist them to establish whether the patient is conscious or not. Unconsciousness is classed as when the individual cannot be woken or is difficult to wake up.
• If the patient is confirmed to be unconscious, the next question presented seeks to establish whether a normal breathing pattern is present.
• Health advisors can use the supporting information provided to advise the caller to check whether the chest is rising and falling regularly and/or whether regular breaths can be heard or felt coming from the nose of mouth. If there is doubt, they are prompted to ask the caller to ‘look, listen and feel’ for breathing.
• If the patient is not breathing normally, the supporting information advises that there may be no or very little attempt being made by the individual to breathe. They are advised that there may be occasional gasps or breaths with possible long pauses in between. The supporting information also advises here that the

skin may appear grey or blue, and where to check for this on the body, and where to check when skin tones may be darker.
• If the patient is not breathing or not breathing sufficiently, this results in a Category 1 ambulance outcome, on the basis that a cardiac arrest is likely. This was the outcome reached in this case based on the information provided.
• Once it has been established that the scene is safe, the NHS Pathways system seeks to establish whether the caller is within easy reach of the patient. If no specific scenarios where specialist instructions are required (such as hanging, drowning, choking etc) are present, information on how to give basic life support (BLS), and whether a defibrillator can be located, presents itself for the health advisor. The only reasons that a health advisor should advise BLS to cease are if the ambulance crew arrive and take over, if the patient regains consciousness, or if the person performing BLS is for some reason unable to continue. NHS Pathways does not ask the caller to try to ascertain if there is a pulse present. For the ordinary lay person, the identification of a pulse can prove challenging, thus potentially wasting valuable time in terms of dispatching an ambulance. All pathways relating to instructional information regarding resuscitation have been approved and ratified by Resuscitation Council UK. Also, of relevance to this particular case, in terms of additional training regarding the assessment of consciousness and breathing, health advisors utilising NHS Pathways who have completed the core training are provided with ‘CPR Toolkit Training’. This encompasses what is called the ‘No, No, Go’ approach where, if the patient is not conscious or not breathing (either normally or at all), health advisors are trained to proceed immediately to the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as presented by the system. This additional training seeks to ensure that health advisors are supported to proceed quickly to the required life supporting advice. The CPR Toolkit training explains that evidence from multiple studies indicates that performing CPR on a patient who is not in cardiac arrest is unlikely to cause harm. Health advisors are therefore trained that, where there is any uncertainty regarding whether a patient’s breathing is normal, or if the patient is not breathing at all, they should initiate telephone-guided CPR. NHS Pathways Management of Expected or Unexpected Death A ‘triage not possible’ route exists within the NHS Pathways system for the management of an expected or unexpected death. From the limited information provided regarding this case, it is not possible to comment on whether or not the health advisor should have selected the option for ‘discovery of a stone cold or stiff dead body’. Even if the health advisor in this case had thought that Drew was already deceased and this route was selected, the option of ‘Sudden Unexpected Death’ would have likely been chosen. This route follows the consciousness/breathing assessment as described above, whereby BLS instructions are presented as the system in this

scenario assumes that CPR should be performed as the exact moment of cardiac arrest is not known. NHS Pathways Additional Health Advisor Support Almost every question in the NHS Pathways triage system has ‘supporting information’, shown under the question text, enabling the health advisor to ask probing questions. This supports health advisors to ensure the caller’s responses match the answer selection. ‘Probing’ is extensively trained in the health advisors’ mandatory training, and the facility is a fundamental aspect of the NHS Pathways system and how it differs from fixed-script based systems. The supporting information provided to support the identification of an immediate threat to life is extensive as, in circumstances whereby a patient may not be conscious or breathing, this is recognised as an exceptionally stressful situation for all involved including the health advisor. The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) In addition to the NHS Pathways response detailed above and whilst this falls outside of NHS England’s direct remit, for completeness, NHS England has discussed the concerns in your Report with the provider of the MPDS triage system. The MPDS is a long-established triage system launched in 1979, published by the Priority Dispatch Corporation (PDC), and its ongoing development is supported by the International Academies of Emergency Dispatch (IAED). PDC has advised that:
• Upon the report of a patient found on the floor ‘unresponsive and not breathing’, with no other indication of trauma or cause of injury, the 999 call handler will utilise the MPDS instructions to provide CPR advice to the caller.
• CPR advice will not be discontinued until a responder is at scene to take over, unless there is definite evidence that the patient is no longer in cardiac arrest.
• In the event that a caller provides additional information that indicates a patient may be beyond help, the call handler will continue to provide CPR instructions unless a specific set of individual ambulance service Medical Director approved identifiers are mentioned, which include the patient being cold and stiff in a warm environment, or if the patient’s condition is incompatible with life.
• If any of the identifiers are confirmed, the MPDS will direct the call handler to ask an additional safety question to confirm the detail and ensure the caller is clear that the patient cannot be resuscitated. Only in this instance would the call handler cease advice and clear the line. This obvious death information is only addressed if volunteered by the caller.
• Where a patient is unconscious and not breathing, CPR advice will be delivered and no other interruption to the guidance for the caller will occur. Should the Coroner require any further information relevant to the MPDS, we would advise that you contact PDC directly.

I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical

Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Drew, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Sent To
  • NHS England
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 5 Mar 2026
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 25 March 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Drew John GREAVES-PIMBLETT aged 26. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 08 January 2026. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Drew Drew John Greaves-Pimblett died as a result of: 1a Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP)
b. Epilepsy Natural Causes
Circumstances of the Death
Drew John Greaves-Pimblett was a 26 year old gentleman who had a medical history of epilepsy. On 22 March 2025, Drew was found unresponsive on the floor of the bathroom of his home address. At 14:11 hours a call was made to the North West Ambulance Service (NWAS), the information provided to the call handler was that Drew was found on the floor unresponsive and not breathing. The call was assessed as a category 1 emergency and an ambulance was allocated at 14:12 hours. As a result of the on-going conversation and confirmation of the fact he was not breathing, at 14:15 hours it was established Drew was epileptic, cold to touch and his finger nails, lips and face were grey. It was also proving difficult for him to be turned over onto his back so he remained on his front. As a result of this information, in accordance with the NWAS pathway, the call handler deemed Drew had not ‘just died’ and so resuscitation would not be effective. At 14:16 hours the ambulance was stood down and the police notified. At 14.43 hours the police attended and one officer noted Drew was still warm to the touch and so CPR was commenced. The other officer present observed Drew’s lips were blue/purple and swollen and his chest was quite stiff making CPR difficult. NWAS were contacted again, and an ambulance arrived at 14:44 hours and Drew was pronounced deceased at 14:46 hours on the same day. A review of the first call made to NWAS revealed the call handler should not have down-graded the call and should not have stood the ambulance down until further probing questions were asked. There were no questions asked to establish how cold Drew was (‘stone cold’ or otherwise), how it was established he was not breathing, whether anyone else was available to help turn Drew onto his back and how stiff Drew was to establish whether rigor mortis had set in. It is impossible to know whether, after the probing questions were asked, the call hander would have reached the same conclusion or whether CPR would have been advised. The absence of the probing questions being a missed opportunity. It would be pure speculation to reach a conclusion that had CPR been carried out it would be a different outcome for Drew. NWAS found the appropriate standard of the call had not been achieved. In all the circumstances it is more likely that not Drew died of natural causes.
Copies Sent To
1. North West Ambulance Service 2. (spouse
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Independent Statutory Resilience Body
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Improved Risk Assessment Approach
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Triennial Pandemic Exercises
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Publish Exercise Reports and Lessons
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Apply best offer principle equally in GLOS
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Post Office to engage in negotiations during HSSA appeal period
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Set deadline for HSS claims with guidance on late applications
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Clarify whether HCRS and OCS assessment processes differ
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Establish standing public body to administer future redress schemes
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Devise redress process for affected family members
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.