Jason White
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2025-0638
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 13 Feb 2026
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Antipsychotic medication was abruptly ceased, and the daily monitoring plan was not followed, creating an unmanaged risk of relapse and serious deterioration in the patient's mental health.
View full coroner's concerns
1. Antipsychotic medication (Olanzapine) abruptly ceased and the management plan of daily monitoring was not followed.
2. This created a risk of relapse in terms of psychotic symptoms and associated deterioration in mental health.
3. Risks of relapse when any medication is abruptly ceased. Must be fully monitored; the absence of full assessment and monitoring exposes patients to risk of a serious deterioration in mental health.
2. This created a risk of relapse in terms of psychotic symptoms and associated deterioration in mental health.
3. Risks of relapse when any medication is abruptly ceased. Must be fully monitored; the absence of full assessment and monitoring exposes patients to risk of a serious deterioration in mental health.
Responses
Action Planned
• The approach to monitoring service users following changes to antipsychotic medication has been strengthened and is being implemented, with full standardisation across all relevant services to be completed by 1 March 2026. • Any request for enhanced monitoring following medication changes is now formally logged and reviewed at the first daily multidisciplinary planning meeting. • The process includes a structured clinical discussion to confirm the level of risk and the intensity of monitoring required, clear allocation of responsibility to a named clinician, and formal recording within the clinical diary system. (AI summary)
• The approach to monitoring service users following changes to antipsychotic medication has been strengthened and is being implemented, with full standardisation across all relevant services to be completed by 1 March 2026. • Any request for enhanced monitoring following medication changes is now formally logged and reviewed at the first daily multidisciplinary planning meeting. • The process includes a structured clinical discussion to confirm the level of risk and the intensity of monitoring required, clear allocation of responsibility to a named clinician, and formal recording within the clinical diary system. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Mundy
Prevention of Future Deaths Report issued following the Inquest touching the death of Mr Jason White - DoB 28/02/1969
I am writing in connection with the Prevention of Future Deaths Report issued following the above inquest that was heard before you between 20 December 2024 and 3 December 2025.
During the inquest, you identified areas of concern arising from the evidence presented, specifically:
1. The abrupt cessation of antipsychotic medication (Olanzapine) and the failure to follow the agreed management plan of daily monitoring.
2. The resulting increased risk of relapse, including the return of psychotic symptoms and deterioration in mental health.
3. The wider risk associated with abrupt cessation of medication without full assessment and appropriate monitoring, potentially exposing patients to serious deterioration in their mental wellbeing.
As a direct response to the learning from this case, we have strengthened our approach to monitoring service users following changes to antipsychotic medication. These improvements are already being implemented in practice, with full standardisation across all relevant services to be completed by 1 March 2026.
Specifically, any request for enhanced monitoring following medication changes is now formally logged and reviewed at the first daily multidisciplinary planning meeting (commonly referred to as the “huddle”). This ensures immediate visibility, shared clinical oversight, and timely decision- making. The process includes:
1. A structured clinical discussion to confirm the level of risk and the intensity of monitoring required. Where monitoring is required more than two to three times per week, referral to the Home Treatment Team is actively considered.
2. Clear allocation of responsibility to a named clinician, ensuring ownership and continuity of follow-up.
3. Where immediate follow-up cannot be undertaken, the requirement is formally recorded within the clinical diary system to ensure oversight and action by the duty team.
These arrangements are already operating within Community Mental Health Teams and are being embedded consistently across all teams to ensure a reliable and auditable approach. In parallel, routine planned appointments with service users continue, providing ongoing clinical review, continuity of care and further opportunities for early identification of relapse or deterioration. Collectively, these actions represent a significant strengthening of our systems for managing medication changes. They reinforce shared clinical responsibility, improve visibility of risk and ensure that monitoring arrangements are clear, proactive and responsive. Most importantly, they place patient safety at the forefront of care delivery following medication changes. I hope this response provides assurance that the concerns identified during the inquest have been carefully considered and that meaningful, sustained improvements are underway. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further information. On behalf of Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, I would like once again to extend our sincere condolences to Mr White’s family.
Prevention of Future Deaths Report issued following the Inquest touching the death of Mr Jason White - DoB 28/02/1969
I am writing in connection with the Prevention of Future Deaths Report issued following the above inquest that was heard before you between 20 December 2024 and 3 December 2025.
During the inquest, you identified areas of concern arising from the evidence presented, specifically:
1. The abrupt cessation of antipsychotic medication (Olanzapine) and the failure to follow the agreed management plan of daily monitoring.
2. The resulting increased risk of relapse, including the return of psychotic symptoms and deterioration in mental health.
3. The wider risk associated with abrupt cessation of medication without full assessment and appropriate monitoring, potentially exposing patients to serious deterioration in their mental wellbeing.
As a direct response to the learning from this case, we have strengthened our approach to monitoring service users following changes to antipsychotic medication. These improvements are already being implemented in practice, with full standardisation across all relevant services to be completed by 1 March 2026.
Specifically, any request for enhanced monitoring following medication changes is now formally logged and reviewed at the first daily multidisciplinary planning meeting (commonly referred to as the “huddle”). This ensures immediate visibility, shared clinical oversight, and timely decision- making. The process includes:
1. A structured clinical discussion to confirm the level of risk and the intensity of monitoring required. Where monitoring is required more than two to three times per week, referral to the Home Treatment Team is actively considered.
2. Clear allocation of responsibility to a named clinician, ensuring ownership and continuity of follow-up.
3. Where immediate follow-up cannot be undertaken, the requirement is formally recorded within the clinical diary system to ensure oversight and action by the duty team.
These arrangements are already operating within Community Mental Health Teams and are being embedded consistently across all teams to ensure a reliable and auditable approach. In parallel, routine planned appointments with service users continue, providing ongoing clinical review, continuity of care and further opportunities for early identification of relapse or deterioration. Collectively, these actions represent a significant strengthening of our systems for managing medication changes. They reinforce shared clinical responsibility, improve visibility of risk and ensure that monitoring arrangements are clear, proactive and responsive. Most importantly, they place patient safety at the forefront of care delivery following medication changes. I hope this response provides assurance that the concerns identified during the inquest have been carefully considered and that meaningful, sustained improvements are underway. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further information. On behalf of Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, I would like once again to extend our sincere condolences to Mr White’s family.
Sent To
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
13 Feb 2026
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 20 December 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Jason Ricardo White. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest . The conclusion of the inquest was Suicide. The cause of death was: 1a
Circumstances of the Death
Jason Ricardo White developed mental health symptoms in April 2024 which were essentially depression and psychotic episodes. Mr White engaged with both his GP and mental health support services including the Priory hospital in Nottingham, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, and Sheffield City Council to manage his symptoms. He remained fixated on his symptoms being linked to serious medical complaints and appeared at no time to accept that the physical symptomology of which he complained was inextricably linked to his mental health challenges. Mr White received various levels of management which included medication. One of those medications was olanzapine. This was ceased abruptly due to a belief that this was responsible for deranged liver function tests but there was inadequate follow-up thereafter. As it was Mr White died from on the 10th of December 2024 .
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.