Emma Sanders
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2024-0646
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Mental Health related deaths
Suicide (from 2015)
All 2 responses received
· Deadline: 21 Jan 2025
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A High Intensity Use Care Plan was not shared with ambulance services or other hospitals. Upon admission, there were delays in accessing the patient's record, preventing adherence to her care plan and leaving staff unaware of her significant self-harm history.
View full coroner's concerns
1. During the inquest evidence was heard that: i. At the time of her death Emma had a Frequent Attender Care plan, or as they are now known a High Intensity Use Care Plan, in place. This plan was agreed by representatives from Dorset Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (DHUFT) who provide the mental health care across Dorset, a representative from the Royal Bournemouth Hospital, a representative from Poole Hospital and a representative from We Are With You (WAWY) who supported Emma with her substance misuse. The aims of this plan for Emma were:
• to provide a consistent approach when Emma presented to the emergency department
• to streamline her care so that she does not have to wait any longer than necessary in the ED as she has identified this makes her feel worse
• to minimise the impact on emergency department resources when Emma attends
• to reduce the use of restrictive interventions which may exacerbate Emma’s distress ii. South West Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust (SWAST), who provide the paramedic care in the South West, were not provided with the plan prior to the 14th March 2023, nor were other hospitals Emma may present to, such as the other local hospital in Dorset, Dorset County Hospital, or the hospital in Cornwall where Emma was taken to when she self harmed on the 5th March 2023 during her time at the detoxification and rehabilitation placement.
iii. On the 14th March 2023, due to the capacity issues the cohorting area was opened at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital and representatives from SWAST were caring for the patients in the cohorting area. When Emma arrived at the hospital, she was taken to the cohorting area and was booked into the hospital by the triage nurse from the hospital, although was not seen by them and her previous records were not accessed.
iv. There can be a delay in accessing the hospital patient record when a patient arrives at the hospital as following the booking in process, there needs to be a merger of the ambulance paperwork to verify they have the correct person before the hospital patient record can be accessed. The process adopted by different hospitals may cause a delay in access to the hospital patient record and evidence was given that at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital this could be anything up to 10 minutes from experience.
v. When Emma arrived at the hospital she was booked in by the triage nurse between 18.49 and 18.52 hours, however the merger of her records did not happen until 18.59 hours. No representative from the hospital saw Emma prior to her death and she was monitored by the SWAST paramedics in the cohorting area, so there was no access to her patient record which detailed her significant history of self harm and the Frequent Attender Care Plan. The Frequent Attender Care Plan was not followed throughout the 1 hour and 47 minutes Emma was with professionals from when SWAST attended her home address until the time she was last seen prior to her death. Had it been accessed, and followed, there would have been opportunities to discuss with Emma further support for her whilst she was at the hospital and the evidence given by the witnesses who had contact with her that day was that they would have considered managing her care differently.
vi. University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, of which the Royal Bournemouth Hospital forms part, have taken action internally to ensure that a person’s records are now available when a person arrives at the hospital and this would include access to Frequent Attender Care Plans, however evidence was given that a similar process around the merger of records is undertaken at other hospitals across the South West, from the experience of SWAST, and this may also be a national issue.
vii. The Summary Care Record (SCR) is accessible to a variety of healthcare professionals and accessible to SWAST.
viii. As per the NHS England website, link found here Summary Care Record - NHS England Digital, “The Summary Care Record (SCR) is a national database that holds electronic records of important patient information such as current medication, allergies and details of any previous bad reactions to medicines, created from GP medical records. It can be seen and used by authorised staff in other areas of the health and care system involved in the patient's direct care”.
ix. Documents cannot be uploaded to the SCR, however a section can be added to the SCR to detail information such as care plans. Evidence was given that the content of the SCR is controlled by the specific Integrated Care Boards (ICB) covering that area. There are 42 ICBs across England and Wales.
x. The SCR for Dorset does not include a section to detail the care plans in place for individuals. The Deputy Director for Care for SWAST gave evidence that none of the ICBs in the South West Region has a section in the SCR to detail care plans in place for individuals. IF there were such a section, the GP of the individual would then be responsible for uploading the details to the SCR and then it would be accessible to other health professionals the person comes into contact with nationally.
2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. There can be a delay in accessing a patient’s hospital record and history when they are taken to hospital by a paramedic depending on the method of booking in and triage which could impact on patient care, especially if there are delays in them being assessed such as when they are placed in cohorting areas, and this could lead to a future death.
ii. The Summary Care Record does not detail care plans in place for individuals in Dorset, the wider South West region and may be nationally. Lack of access to these plans could impact on patient care and lead to a future death.
• to provide a consistent approach when Emma presented to the emergency department
• to streamline her care so that she does not have to wait any longer than necessary in the ED as she has identified this makes her feel worse
• to minimise the impact on emergency department resources when Emma attends
• to reduce the use of restrictive interventions which may exacerbate Emma’s distress ii. South West Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust (SWAST), who provide the paramedic care in the South West, were not provided with the plan prior to the 14th March 2023, nor were other hospitals Emma may present to, such as the other local hospital in Dorset, Dorset County Hospital, or the hospital in Cornwall where Emma was taken to when she self harmed on the 5th March 2023 during her time at the detoxification and rehabilitation placement.
iii. On the 14th March 2023, due to the capacity issues the cohorting area was opened at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital and representatives from SWAST were caring for the patients in the cohorting area. When Emma arrived at the hospital, she was taken to the cohorting area and was booked into the hospital by the triage nurse from the hospital, although was not seen by them and her previous records were not accessed.
iv. There can be a delay in accessing the hospital patient record when a patient arrives at the hospital as following the booking in process, there needs to be a merger of the ambulance paperwork to verify they have the correct person before the hospital patient record can be accessed. The process adopted by different hospitals may cause a delay in access to the hospital patient record and evidence was given that at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital this could be anything up to 10 minutes from experience.
v. When Emma arrived at the hospital she was booked in by the triage nurse between 18.49 and 18.52 hours, however the merger of her records did not happen until 18.59 hours. No representative from the hospital saw Emma prior to her death and she was monitored by the SWAST paramedics in the cohorting area, so there was no access to her patient record which detailed her significant history of self harm and the Frequent Attender Care Plan. The Frequent Attender Care Plan was not followed throughout the 1 hour and 47 minutes Emma was with professionals from when SWAST attended her home address until the time she was last seen prior to her death. Had it been accessed, and followed, there would have been opportunities to discuss with Emma further support for her whilst she was at the hospital and the evidence given by the witnesses who had contact with her that day was that they would have considered managing her care differently.
vi. University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, of which the Royal Bournemouth Hospital forms part, have taken action internally to ensure that a person’s records are now available when a person arrives at the hospital and this would include access to Frequent Attender Care Plans, however evidence was given that a similar process around the merger of records is undertaken at other hospitals across the South West, from the experience of SWAST, and this may also be a national issue.
vii. The Summary Care Record (SCR) is accessible to a variety of healthcare professionals and accessible to SWAST.
viii. As per the NHS England website, link found here Summary Care Record - NHS England Digital, “The Summary Care Record (SCR) is a national database that holds electronic records of important patient information such as current medication, allergies and details of any previous bad reactions to medicines, created from GP medical records. It can be seen and used by authorised staff in other areas of the health and care system involved in the patient's direct care”.
ix. Documents cannot be uploaded to the SCR, however a section can be added to the SCR to detail information such as care plans. Evidence was given that the content of the SCR is controlled by the specific Integrated Care Boards (ICB) covering that area. There are 42 ICBs across England and Wales.
x. The SCR for Dorset does not include a section to detail the care plans in place for individuals. The Deputy Director for Care for SWAST gave evidence that none of the ICBs in the South West Region has a section in the SCR to detail care plans in place for individuals. IF there were such a section, the GP of the individual would then be responsible for uploading the details to the SCR and then it would be accessible to other health professionals the person comes into contact with nationally.
2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. There can be a delay in accessing a patient’s hospital record and history when they are taken to hospital by a paramedic depending on the method of booking in and triage which could impact on patient care, especially if there are delays in them being assessed such as when they are placed in cohorting areas, and this could lead to a future death.
ii. The Summary Care Record does not detail care plans in place for individuals in Dorset, the wider South West region and may be nationally. Lack of access to these plans could impact on patient care and lead to a future death.
Responses
Noted
NHS England acknowledges the concerns and provides context on the Summary Care Record (SCR), the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) guidance, and the National Record Locator (NRL), and states reports are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group. (AI summary)
NHS England acknowledges the concerns and provides context on the Summary Care Record (SCR), the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) guidance, and the National Record Locator (NRL), and states reports are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Coroner, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Emma Victoria Sanders who died on 19 March 2023.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 26 November 2024 concerning the death of Emma Victoria Sanders on 19 March 2023. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Emma’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Emma’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.
I am grateful for the further time granted to respond to your Report, and I apologise for any anguish this delay may have caused Emma’s family or friends. I realise that responses to Coroner Reports can form part of the important process of family and friends coming to terms with what has happened to their loved ones, and I appreciate this will have been an incredibly difficult time for them.
Your Report raised concerns over delays in accessing a patient’s hospital record and history when they are taken to hospital by a paramedic, depending on the method of booking in and triage, and that the Summary Care Record does not detail care plans in place for individuals in Dorset, the wider South West region and possibly nationally.
The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) have developed guidance that addresses case management of frequent attendance in the Emergency Department, including multi-agency care plans. The guidance can be found here: Frequent_Attendance_in_the_Emergency_Department_v1.pdf
The Summary Care Record (SCR) is a national database that holds electronic records of important patient information such as current medication, allergies and details of any previous bad reactions to medicines. It is created from GP medical records so whenever a GP record is updated, the changes are synchronised to the SCR. It can be seen and used by authorised staff in other areas of the health and care system who are involved in the patient's direct care, but do not need access to the patient's full record. As such, the SCR is intended to provide a summary of the patient’s GP record, including the key information most likely to be of benefit to patients during an unscheduled care encounter.
National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG 22 January 2025
The SCR can include more detailed information in addition to the patient’s current medication, allergies and reactions to medicines, which is referred to as ‘Additional Information’. This Additional Information may include significant medical history, anticipatory care information (such as information about the management of long-term conditions), immunisations or specific communications needs. This information is now included by default for patients with an SCR, unless they have previously told the NHS that they did not want this information to be shared. It can also include any history of deliberate self-harm, suicide attempts or suicidal ideation.
The SCR is not intended to include the full detail of a patient’s care plan, and the design / format of the SCR does not support this. However, the SCR can include a signpost to the existence of a care plan by using a relevant code for the following, or otherwise a free-text entry:
• Emergency health care plan
• Liaison psychiatry care plan
• Mental health crisis plan
• Crisis plan
• Treatment escalation plan
• Community mental health care plan
The SCR content is only authored from the patient’s registered GP Practice. For information about the existence of a care plan to be shared in this way, the patient’s GP Practice needs to be made aware of the care plan and then enter this information using an appropriate specific clinical code.
With regards to the SCR, at present, approximately 88.1% of the population have a Summary Care Record with Additional Information, 7.3% have a Core Only SCR (Allergies and Medications only) and 1.5% have opted out of having a SCR. Furthermore, where possible, patients need to provide their ‘Permission to View’ before their SCR can be accessed. However, an Emergency Access option is available for scenarios where a patient is not able to provide their ‘Permission to View’
e.g. the patient is unconscious.
Additional to the SCR, NHS England’s National Record Locator (NRL) service allows health or social care workers to find and access patient information shared by other health and social care organisations across England, to support the direct care of a patient. It does this by recording the location of digital (and paper) records within the NHS and providing an index of pointers/bookmarks that contain the information required to retrieve key patient information from the source.
The NRL removes the need for organisations to create duplicate copies of information across systems and organisations, by facilitating access to up-to-date information directly from the source. It also provides users with an indication of the organisations with which a patient currently has a care relationship, to enable a user to contact the service responsible for a plan to support the individual in the event of a crisis.
It is important to note that the author of NRL documents is the creator of the document (e.g. a Mental Health Trust), whereas the author of the SCR is the patient’s registered GP Practice. Mental Health Crisis plans are one of the pointer types supported by the NRL Service. NRL does not store any of the Mental Health data, but points users to where they can find it. NRL Information can be consumed from source through the National Care Records Service (NCRS).
The NCRS is an additional service that allows health and social care professionals to access and update a range of patient and safeguarding information, which is available across regional Integrated Care System (ICS) boundaries. The service provides a summary of health and care information for care settings where the full patient record is not required to support their direct care.
The services available in NCRS include the Summary Care Record and the National Record Locator. A full list of services is available here:
In addition, the Connecting Care Records (ConCR) programme, previously known as the Shared Care Record programme, could also be used to share these care plans. The NCRS complements ConCR which is a way of bringing separate records from different health and care organisations together digitally in one place and joining up information based on an individual rather than one organisation. ConCR can include care plans and will typically hold more information about an individual than a Summary Care Record.
Responsibility for delivering shared care records sits with local Integrated Care Boards (ICBs). Each ICB’s shared care records are developed in response to the health and care needs of the local area, existing systems, and future planning. This means some of their shared care records are available to neighbouring ICBs, while others are only supported within their own ICB.
A number of Mental Health Trusts (currently 15 out of the 50 in England) also provide access to their patients’ Crisis Plans via the National Record Locator (NRL). When trusts choose to share their patients’ information, their Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system automatically creates a “pointer” on the NRL, which tells another clinician (such as a Paramedic) that a record exists. Most of the trusts connected to the NRL also allow a real-time pdf of the care plan document itself to be retrieved by the clinician.
NHS England understands that Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust does not currently share their crisis plans through the NRL, although their EPR system supplier are accredited to connect to it. However, to our knowledge, the South Western Ambulance Service does use NCRS and NRL widely and would be able to receive it. We refer the Coroner to the response from the Chief Executive of NHS Dorset for further information on local and regional arrangements.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Emma, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 26 November 2024 concerning the death of Emma Victoria Sanders on 19 March 2023. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Emma’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Emma’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.
I am grateful for the further time granted to respond to your Report, and I apologise for any anguish this delay may have caused Emma’s family or friends. I realise that responses to Coroner Reports can form part of the important process of family and friends coming to terms with what has happened to their loved ones, and I appreciate this will have been an incredibly difficult time for them.
Your Report raised concerns over delays in accessing a patient’s hospital record and history when they are taken to hospital by a paramedic, depending on the method of booking in and triage, and that the Summary Care Record does not detail care plans in place for individuals in Dorset, the wider South West region and possibly nationally.
The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) have developed guidance that addresses case management of frequent attendance in the Emergency Department, including multi-agency care plans. The guidance can be found here: Frequent_Attendance_in_the_Emergency_Department_v1.pdf
The Summary Care Record (SCR) is a national database that holds electronic records of important patient information such as current medication, allergies and details of any previous bad reactions to medicines. It is created from GP medical records so whenever a GP record is updated, the changes are synchronised to the SCR. It can be seen and used by authorised staff in other areas of the health and care system who are involved in the patient's direct care, but do not need access to the patient's full record. As such, the SCR is intended to provide a summary of the patient’s GP record, including the key information most likely to be of benefit to patients during an unscheduled care encounter.
National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG 22 January 2025
The SCR can include more detailed information in addition to the patient’s current medication, allergies and reactions to medicines, which is referred to as ‘Additional Information’. This Additional Information may include significant medical history, anticipatory care information (such as information about the management of long-term conditions), immunisations or specific communications needs. This information is now included by default for patients with an SCR, unless they have previously told the NHS that they did not want this information to be shared. It can also include any history of deliberate self-harm, suicide attempts or suicidal ideation.
The SCR is not intended to include the full detail of a patient’s care plan, and the design / format of the SCR does not support this. However, the SCR can include a signpost to the existence of a care plan by using a relevant code for the following, or otherwise a free-text entry:
• Emergency health care plan
• Liaison psychiatry care plan
• Mental health crisis plan
• Crisis plan
• Treatment escalation plan
• Community mental health care plan
The SCR content is only authored from the patient’s registered GP Practice. For information about the existence of a care plan to be shared in this way, the patient’s GP Practice needs to be made aware of the care plan and then enter this information using an appropriate specific clinical code.
With regards to the SCR, at present, approximately 88.1% of the population have a Summary Care Record with Additional Information, 7.3% have a Core Only SCR (Allergies and Medications only) and 1.5% have opted out of having a SCR. Furthermore, where possible, patients need to provide their ‘Permission to View’ before their SCR can be accessed. However, an Emergency Access option is available for scenarios where a patient is not able to provide their ‘Permission to View’
e.g. the patient is unconscious.
Additional to the SCR, NHS England’s National Record Locator (NRL) service allows health or social care workers to find and access patient information shared by other health and social care organisations across England, to support the direct care of a patient. It does this by recording the location of digital (and paper) records within the NHS and providing an index of pointers/bookmarks that contain the information required to retrieve key patient information from the source.
The NRL removes the need for organisations to create duplicate copies of information across systems and organisations, by facilitating access to up-to-date information directly from the source. It also provides users with an indication of the organisations with which a patient currently has a care relationship, to enable a user to contact the service responsible for a plan to support the individual in the event of a crisis.
It is important to note that the author of NRL documents is the creator of the document (e.g. a Mental Health Trust), whereas the author of the SCR is the patient’s registered GP Practice. Mental Health Crisis plans are one of the pointer types supported by the NRL Service. NRL does not store any of the Mental Health data, but points users to where they can find it. NRL Information can be consumed from source through the National Care Records Service (NCRS).
The NCRS is an additional service that allows health and social care professionals to access and update a range of patient and safeguarding information, which is available across regional Integrated Care System (ICS) boundaries. The service provides a summary of health and care information for care settings where the full patient record is not required to support their direct care.
The services available in NCRS include the Summary Care Record and the National Record Locator. A full list of services is available here:
In addition, the Connecting Care Records (ConCR) programme, previously known as the Shared Care Record programme, could also be used to share these care plans. The NCRS complements ConCR which is a way of bringing separate records from different health and care organisations together digitally in one place and joining up information based on an individual rather than one organisation. ConCR can include care plans and will typically hold more information about an individual than a Summary Care Record.
Responsibility for delivering shared care records sits with local Integrated Care Boards (ICBs). Each ICB’s shared care records are developed in response to the health and care needs of the local area, existing systems, and future planning. This means some of their shared care records are available to neighbouring ICBs, while others are only supported within their own ICB.
A number of Mental Health Trusts (currently 15 out of the 50 in England) also provide access to their patients’ Crisis Plans via the National Record Locator (NRL). When trusts choose to share their patients’ information, their Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system automatically creates a “pointer” on the NRL, which tells another clinician (such as a Paramedic) that a record exists. Most of the trusts connected to the NRL also allow a real-time pdf of the care plan document itself to be retrieved by the clinician.
NHS England understands that Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust does not currently share their crisis plans through the NRL, although their EPR system supplier are accredited to connect to it. However, to our knowledge, the South Western Ambulance Service does use NCRS and NRL widely and would be able to receive it. We refer the Coroner to the response from the Chief Executive of NHS Dorset for further information on local and regional arrangements.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Emma, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Action Planned
NHS Dorset will enforce the use of the Dorset Care Record in line with contractual commitments in 2025/2026 and will monitor progress of the issue directly via their Corporate Risk Register. They will also share the Regulation 28 Report with NHS partners and wider system partners at the Pan Dorset Mortality Group. (AI summary)
NHS Dorset will enforce the use of the Dorset Care Record in line with contractual commitments in 2025/2026 and will monitor progress of the issue directly via their Corporate Risk Register. They will also share the Regulation 28 Report with NHS partners and wider system partners at the Pan Dorset Mortality Group. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mrs R C Griffin
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths (ref 30595408) I am writing to you in response to the concerns raised by your investigation into the circumstances surrounding the tragic death of Emma Victoria Sanders. We take our responsibility to act on the learning from serious incidents seriously and I offer you this response to outline where NHS Dorset can use its role to support and influence some of the changes you seek.
1. As per Paragraph 2 (i/ii) of your report outlining your concerns, a review has taken place on the process of identification of patients with High Intensity Care Plans. The uploading of patient records into the national summary care record remains an issue and is out of the control of NHS Dorset. However, we will enforce the use of the Dorset Care Record in line with our contractual commitments in 2025/2026 and onwards.
2. In addition, we will monitor progress of the issue directly via our Corporate Risk Register. This will have Board level scrutiny.
3. The Regulation 28 Report will be shared and reviewed with NHS partners and wider system partners at the Pan Dorset Mortality Group.
I hope that the information I have offered provides some assurance that the findings of your investigation and the areas you have highlighted for the prevention of future deaths has prompted action and remains the focus of our continued commitment to supporting the safety and wellbeing of everyone who uses NHS services.
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths (ref 30595408) I am writing to you in response to the concerns raised by your investigation into the circumstances surrounding the tragic death of Emma Victoria Sanders. We take our responsibility to act on the learning from serious incidents seriously and I offer you this response to outline where NHS Dorset can use its role to support and influence some of the changes you seek.
1. As per Paragraph 2 (i/ii) of your report outlining your concerns, a review has taken place on the process of identification of patients with High Intensity Care Plans. The uploading of patient records into the national summary care record remains an issue and is out of the control of NHS Dorset. However, we will enforce the use of the Dorset Care Record in line with our contractual commitments in 2025/2026 and onwards.
2. In addition, we will monitor progress of the issue directly via our Corporate Risk Register. This will have Board level scrutiny.
3. The Regulation 28 Report will be shared and reviewed with NHS partners and wider system partners at the Pan Dorset Mortality Group.
I hope that the information I have offered provides some assurance that the findings of your investigation and the areas you have highlighted for the prevention of future deaths has prompted action and remains the focus of our continued commitment to supporting the safety and wellbeing of everyone who uses NHS services.
Sent To
- NHS Dorset
- NHS England
Response Status
Linked responses
2 of 2
56-Day Deadline
21 Jan 2025
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 4th April 2023, an investigation was commenced into the death of Emma Victoria Sanders, aged 34 years.
The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 18th November 2024.
The medical cause of death was:
Ia Hypoxic Brain Encephalopathy Ib Asphyxia
The conclusion of the Inquest was a narrative conclusion that Emma Victoria Sanders died as a consequence of the self-application of a ligature to her neck, in circumstances where her intention remains unclear.
The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 18th November 2024.
The medical cause of death was:
Ia Hypoxic Brain Encephalopathy Ib Asphyxia
The conclusion of the Inquest was a narrative conclusion that Emma Victoria Sanders died as a consequence of the self-application of a ligature to her neck, in circumstances where her intention remains unclear.
Circumstances of the Death
Emma had a complex mental health history with confirmed diagnoses of Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder (EUPD) and complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and was known to regularly self harm by a variety of means. Emma had a history of opiate dependence and on the 22nd February 2023, she began a period in a detoxification and rehabilitation placement in Cornwall in order to become abstinent from methadone so she could progress to therapy treatment for her mental health diagnoses. Prior to this she had experienced a period of relative stability with her mental health. During this placement the methadone prescription was reduced more quickly than she had experienced before, and she became emotionally dysregulated. Her mental health deteriorated, and her acts of self harm increased as a result of which she was taken to the local hospital in Cornwall. The placement was ended on the 7th March as it was felt her risks were too high to be managed in that setting. On the 14th March 2023 Emma was taken to the Emergency Department at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth after she disclosed that she had taken an overdose of her prescribed medication. At this time the hospital was experiencing extreme capacity pressures and Emma was placed in the cohorting corridor which was being staffed by paramedics due to the capacity pressures. At 18.58 hours, when for a very short period of time there were no staff in the corridor, Emma can be seen on the CCTV of the corridor to secret upon her person a nasal canula with plastic tubing from an equipment trolley. At 19.53 hours Emma went to the toilet in the Emergency Department. At 20.03 hours, Emma was found in a collapsed and unresponsive condition on the floor of the toilet with a ligature fashioned from nasal canula tubing around her neck. Following attempts at cardiopulmonary resuscitation there was a return of spontaneous circulation, and she was admitted to the critical care unit at the hospital where she continued to receive care, however her condition deteriorated, and she died on the 19th March 2023.
Copies Sent To
Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust
University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust
South West Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
We Are With You
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Common information practices shared data and electronic records
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Ensure patients receive copies of all inter-professional letters about their care
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Provide parents of young children with copies of all inter-professional healthcare letters
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Require effective communication among healthcare professionals to avoid conflicting patient advice
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Conflicting mental health care plans
Response officer access to case information technology
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
GMMH local structured risk assessment responsibility
Southport Inquiry
Conflicting mental health care plans
GMMH and Alder Hey joint SMART audit
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
National guidance on SMART action points
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.