Elizabeth Holder
PFD Report
Partially Responded
Ref: 2024-0403
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The Trust failed to prevent a predictable and avoidable fall, leading to death. Furthermore, its governance systems inadequately identified and reflected upon these care failings, preventing effective remediation.
View full coroner's concerns
1. The Trust’s failure to prevent a predictable and therefore avoidable fall which resulted in death.
2. Despite this incident activating the PSIRF process which resulted in the completion of an After Action Review (“AAR”), the Trust did not identify any sub-optimal aspects to Mrs Holder’s care. Accordingly, I have a concern regarding the failure of the Trust’s governance systems to; a. Identify and reflect upon failings in care,
b. Consequently, the failure of the trust to act in a way to remediate the factors that contributed to Mrs Holder’s death.
2. Despite this incident activating the PSIRF process which resulted in the completion of an After Action Review (“AAR”), the Trust did not identify any sub-optimal aspects to Mrs Holder’s care. Accordingly, I have a concern regarding the failure of the Trust’s governance systems to; a. Identify and reflect upon failings in care,
b. Consequently, the failure of the trust to act in a way to remediate the factors that contributed to Mrs Holder’s death.
Responses
Noted
The Department of Health and Social Care acknowledges concerns about the investigation and governance processes at Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust following a patient fall. They mention the PSIRF, which became a contractual obligation for all Trusts from April 1, 2024, and that the CQC will be discussing the PSIRF in upcoming meetings with the Trust. (AI summary)
The Department of Health and Social Care acknowledges concerns about the investigation and governance processes at Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust following a patient fall. They mention the PSIRF, which became a contractual obligation for all Trusts from April 1, 2024, and that the CQC will be discussing the PSIRF in upcoming meetings with the Trust. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Irvine, Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 25 July sent to the Department of Health and Social Care about the death of Mrs Elizabeth Grace Holder. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for Patient Safety. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mrs Holder’s death, and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. The report raises concerns over the Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust’s failure to prevent a predictable and therefore avoidable fall which resulted in death. Despite this incident activating the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) at the Trust, no sub- optimal aspects to Mrs Holder’s care were identified. Thus, there are concerns around the failure of the Trust’s governance systems to:
a. Identify and reflect upon failings in care,
b. Consequently, the failure of the trust to act in a way to remediate the factors that contributed to Mrs Holder’s death. In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with NHS England and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to ensure we adequately address your concerns. The Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust is also a direct recipient of this report as the concerns raised relate to the failures at the Trust. I have received assurance that they will be providing a response to address your concerns. I welcome this, so we can better understand what went wrong and deaths such as Mrs Taylor’s can be prevented in the future. A key concern in your report is around the investigation conducted by the Trust and its governance processes. As you might be aware, the PSIRF became a contractual obligation for all Trusts from 1 April 2024, replacing the Serious Incident Framework (SIF).
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Patient Safety, Women’s Health and Mental Health 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU PSIRF overhauls the way Trusts respond to patient safety incidents with a focus on more effective learning and engaging families. Under the SIF, hospitals were only required to investigate incidents that reached the threshold for being defined as ‘serious’. This sometimes meant that other incidents were not investigated or learned from. For patients and families, the former process could be long and drawn out, and some patients reported feeling shut out from investigations. PSIRF aims to provide a more flexible, transparent and compassionate approach to learning responses and investigations, focused on understanding the different factors that contributed to incidents and ensuring organisations learn from them. I have been informed that the CQC will be discussing the PSIRF in upcoming meetings with the Trust. The CQC also continue to monitor the Trust and will consider whether further action is appropriate or necessary. I look forward to any developments which could provide a deeper understanding of the underlying issues at the Trust and help preventing future deaths such as Mrs Holder’s. I strongly believe that working with the NHS to deliver learning from patient safety errors is crucial to changing the way patient safety is approached in the NHS. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.
a. Identify and reflect upon failings in care,
b. Consequently, the failure of the trust to act in a way to remediate the factors that contributed to Mrs Holder’s death. In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with NHS England and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to ensure we adequately address your concerns. The Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust is also a direct recipient of this report as the concerns raised relate to the failures at the Trust. I have received assurance that they will be providing a response to address your concerns. I welcome this, so we can better understand what went wrong and deaths such as Mrs Taylor’s can be prevented in the future. A key concern in your report is around the investigation conducted by the Trust and its governance processes. As you might be aware, the PSIRF became a contractual obligation for all Trusts from 1 April 2024, replacing the Serious Incident Framework (SIF).
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Patient Safety, Women’s Health and Mental Health 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU PSIRF overhauls the way Trusts respond to patient safety incidents with a focus on more effective learning and engaging families. Under the SIF, hospitals were only required to investigate incidents that reached the threshold for being defined as ‘serious’. This sometimes meant that other incidents were not investigated or learned from. For patients and families, the former process could be long and drawn out, and some patients reported feeling shut out from investigations. PSIRF aims to provide a more flexible, transparent and compassionate approach to learning responses and investigations, focused on understanding the different factors that contributed to incidents and ensuring organisations learn from them. I have been informed that the CQC will be discussing the PSIRF in upcoming meetings with the Trust. The CQC also continue to monitor the Trust and will consider whether further action is appropriate or necessary. I look forward to any developments which could provide a deeper understanding of the underlying issues at the Trust and help preventing future deaths such as Mrs Holder’s. I strongly believe that working with the NHS to deliver learning from patient safety errors is crucial to changing the way patient safety is approached in the NHS. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.
Sent To
- Barts Health Foundation Trust
- Department of Health and Social Care
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 2
56-Day Deadline
20 Sep 2024
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Chief Coroner's Non-Response List
The Chief Coroner has confirmed that the following organisation did not respond within the required period:
Barts Health Foundation Trust
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 1st March 2024 this Court commenced an investigation into the death of Elizabeth Grace Holder, aged 88 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 24th July 2024 when the Court returned a narrative conclusion:
“Elizabeth Grace Holder died in hospital on 24th February 2024 due to complications of a fall that occurred whilst recovering from surgery as an inpatient. At the time of the fall, Mrs Holder was not properly supervised.”
Mrs Holder’s medical cause of death was determined as;
1a Intraparenchymal haematoma 1b Fall II Neck of femur fracture (corrected), intraparenchymal haemorrhage
“Elizabeth Grace Holder died in hospital on 24th February 2024 due to complications of a fall that occurred whilst recovering from surgery as an inpatient. At the time of the fall, Mrs Holder was not properly supervised.”
Mrs Holder’s medical cause of death was determined as;
1a Intraparenchymal haematoma 1b Fall II Neck of femur fracture (corrected), intraparenchymal haemorrhage
Circumstances of the Death
Elizabeth Grace Holder was an 88-year-old woman with co-morbidities, restricted mobility and a history of falls.
Elizabeth was admitted to hospital on 29th December 2023 by ambulance following a fall, she was admitted to the trauma unit and underwent a surgical repair of a broken hip. Mrs Holder was noted to be at high risk of falls and had been assessed to require an enhanced level of nursing care, initially requiring 1:1 nursing care.
Mrs Holder had a difficult recovery and developed a surgical wound infection. During her inpatient recovery period the patient lost physical reserve and was observed to be increasingly confused, despite this nursing care was reduced to a 1:2 ratio.
On 15th February 2024 it was noted that Mrs Holder had declined further, she was markedly confused and underwent diagnostic tests resulting in a queried diagnosis of a transient ischaemic accident.
On the evening of 19th February 2024 Elizabeth was observed to be confused and anxious. Mrs Holder had asked to be taken to the lavatory, her request was refused, and she was told to use the commode by a male Health Care Assistant (“HCA”).
The HCA did not believe that it was appropriate for him to observe Mrs Holder in the use of the commode and allowed her to proceed unsupervised behind a ward bay curtain. The HCA did not consider alternative, safer strategies, neither asking the female nurse allocated to Mrs Holder on the same shift to undertake supervision, nor offering to supervise use of the commode in the presence of a chaperone.
The fall resulted in a fatal intra-cerebral bleed.
Elizabeth was admitted to hospital on 29th December 2023 by ambulance following a fall, she was admitted to the trauma unit and underwent a surgical repair of a broken hip. Mrs Holder was noted to be at high risk of falls and had been assessed to require an enhanced level of nursing care, initially requiring 1:1 nursing care.
Mrs Holder had a difficult recovery and developed a surgical wound infection. During her inpatient recovery period the patient lost physical reserve and was observed to be increasingly confused, despite this nursing care was reduced to a 1:2 ratio.
On 15th February 2024 it was noted that Mrs Holder had declined further, she was markedly confused and underwent diagnostic tests resulting in a queried diagnosis of a transient ischaemic accident.
On the evening of 19th February 2024 Elizabeth was observed to be confused and anxious. Mrs Holder had asked to be taken to the lavatory, her request was refused, and she was told to use the commode by a male Health Care Assistant (“HCA”).
The HCA did not believe that it was appropriate for him to observe Mrs Holder in the use of the commode and allowed her to proceed unsupervised behind a ward bay curtain. The HCA did not consider alternative, safer strategies, neither asking the female nurse allocated to Mrs Holder on the same shift to undertake supervision, nor offering to supervise use of the commode in the presence of a chaperone.
The fall resulted in a fatal intra-cerebral bleed.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Apply full and fair meaning consistently across all schemes
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Allow 3-month window to accept Fixed Sum Offer after assessment
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.