Owen Gardner

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2024-0374
Date of Report 15 July 2024
Coroner Nigel Parsley
Coroner Area Suffolk
Response Deadline est. 24 September 2024
All 1 response received · Deadline: 24 Sep 2024
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A patient with cognitive deficit missed appointments because his next of kin were not consistently informed of schedules or short-notice changes, risking future adverse health outcomes.
View full coroner's concerns
the MATTERS OF CONCERN as follows. – In evidence it was heard that Owen had a limited short-term memory and a cognitive deficit, due to the previous Traumatic Brain Injuries that he had suffered. As a result of Owen’s limited short-term memory and cognitive deficit, it was agreed that his next of kin would be informed of all of the appointments Owen had with the NSFT clinician’s providing his care. Evidence at inquest heard that Owen’s next of kin had been informed of such meetings on some occasions, but that it did not occur on every occasion. In addition, evidence was heard that when meetings were changed a short notice (due to unforeseen circumstances, staff sickness or leave absence), Owen himself would be informed, but not his agreed next of kin contact. This led to Owen missing a number of appointments as he had forgotten the changes made, whereas his next of kin would have been able to remind him, and prompt him to attend. It was acknowledged by the court, that in Owen’s case there was no evidence that his attendance at one of his missed appointments would have changed the tragic outcome. However, I am concerned that in the future, an individual with a short-term memory and a cognitive deficit will miss an appointment which could prevent their death, if their next of kin (or chosen point of contact) are not also told of short notice changes to the timings of that appointment. Evidence was heard that there is no system in place to facilitate this.
Responses
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS NHS / Health Body
Action Taken
The Trust is working to improve support for people with cognitive deficits, including a policy to identify and communicate with families/carers, and documentation of next of kin. They have launched a 'Think Carer and Family' programme to ensure carers and next of kin are documented on service users’ records and the clinical team involved in the incident undertook further reflection on human factors that contributed to the incident. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Parsley,

Regulations 28 (Coroners Investigations Regulations 2013) notification made in response to the death of Owen Donal Gardner

I am writing in respect of the prevention of future deaths report you sent to the Trust following the inquest into the death of Mr Gardner, concluded on 3 July 2024.

You wrote to the Trust to raise matters of concern which you assessed the Trust could take action to reduce the risk of future deaths. I am grateful for you writing which supports our drive to provide safe services.

You identified concern that an individual with a short term memory difficulties and a cognitive deficit will miss an appointment which could prevent their death, if their next of kin (or chosen point of contact) are not also told of short notice changes to the timings of that appointment.

Your concern was based on the evidence that the Trust had agreed to inform Mr Gardner’s next of kin of his appointment with his clinical team. On occasions, short notice changes to dates resulted in Mr Gardner being informed but sometimes not his agreed next of kin. The impact of this was that Mr Gardner missed a number of appointments as he was unable to retain information of appointment changes. You heard evidence there was no robust system in place to facilitate this.

The Trust agrees it is critical that people are provided with the right support to enable them to access care at the right time. The practical role that families and carers play cannot be underestimated and the Trust’s goal is to work in collaboration with families to enable the best outcomes for people that access our services.

To this end, it is our policy, at the commencement of care, to identify who the family and/or carer is and how we may communicate with them, based on the consent and agreement from the service user. The policy and expectation is for staff to record service user consent to information sharing on the Trust ‘Your Data: Your Choices’ form. In addition, communication preferences should be noted in their care plan/combined assessment and those preferences used in accordance with the patient wishes, whether the communication takes place by telephone, email or text message.

It is most often the case that routine appointments are communicated by letter however urgent or cancellation appointment offers may be made via text, email or through telephone calls based on the agreed method and timeframe to the appointment. This means there is no one single technical solution that will fully mitigate the risk but a range of actions.

1. The Trust is in the process of procuring a new Electronic Patient Record (EPR) which includes ‘patient portal’ functionality that will enhance our capabilities for appointment scheduling, particularly in terms of visibility for patients. This new EPR is approximately two years from being NSFT Trust Management Norfolk & Suffolk Foundation Trust County Hall Martineau Lane Norwich NR1 2DBH Tel: 01603-421421

Date: 09 September 2024 Senior Coroner Nigel Parsley Suffolk Coroner’s Court Beacon House Whitehouse Road Ipswich IP1 5PB E mail: Coroners.service@suffolk.gov.uk By email only

available however, as we are following the nationally mandated procurement route for such purchases.

2. In the interim the trust has commenced work on enhancing the current EPR, Lorenzo. We have identified a potential enhancement that will allow staff to indicate, when generating correspondance (including appointments) that the correspondence should also be sent to the Next of Kin or Carer, according to stated patient preference

We have some concern that this feature could result in correspondance being sent to Next of Kin or Carers without appropriate permissions so the change would only be implemented once we have been reassured that it is clinically safe and compliant with our Information Governance policy.

Following this assessment, if the change goes ahead it will be completed as a priority as soon as possible, our current expectation is that it will be in place by the end of November 2024.

3. The Trust has also issued a patient safety alert to ensure the process remains a primary focus for our staff while this work is completed. This is attached for information.

4. In addition, our community services standard operating procedure will be updated to include the guidance on the enhanced changes to Lorenzo, along with confirmation of the expectation that communication preferences will be noted in the service user care plan/combined assessment for ease of reference when communicating with service users and those supporting them.

5. The Trust had also initiated a Listening into Action™ pioneer programme called Think Carer and Family. The Listening into Action™ programme approach is a comprehensive, systemic, outcome- oriented approach to empower staff at all levels to work through any challenges to ensure quality outcomes. In order to bring greater consistency to recording next of kin details to ensure that the technical improvement and system expectation mentioned in the above paragraphs can be meaningfully applied, the aim of the Think Carer and Family LiA programme which was launched on 10 June 2024 is to have 90% of carers and 100% of Next of Kin documented on service users’ records. Initially within Child and Adolescent Mental Health Team, West Suffolk, and Adult Crisis and Resolution Home Treatment Team, West Suffolk, rolling out to the rest of the trust from October 2025.

Finally, you are aware that the Trust undertook a safety incident review in order to identify any learning to improve practice and shared that report with the clinical team that provided care to Mr Gardner.

6. The clinical team involved in Mr Gardner’s care have undertaken further reflection and consideration of the Safety Incident Review investigation undertaken by the patient safety team alongside the findings made at inquest, and the Regulation 28 report. This has enabled the clinical team and its managers to reflect upon any human factors that contributed to the situation which arose in Mr Gardner’s case regarding family not being directly invited to the discharge appointment that had been brought forward by 90 minutes, by agreement directly with Mr Gardner. This further reflection took place on Thursday 5 September 2024 for this purpose.

The outcome from this meeting was that the EPR system enhancement noted at paragraph 2 will be helpful and the team, will robustly ensure that all future assessments will include consideration of possible short term memory difficulties and confirmation of communication preferences which will be recorded in the combined assessment/recovery plan and safety plans.

I hope the above-mentioned actions provide assurance to you and Mr Gardner’s family that NSFT is committed to improving practice for all our service users.
Sent To
  • Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 24 Sep 2024
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 22 May 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Owen Donal GARDNER aged 29. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 03 July 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Road Traffic Collision The medical cause of death was confirmed as: 1a Multiple Injuries 1b 1c
Circumstances of the Death
5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern)
Copies Sent To
Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust (Legal Services)
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Standardised Advance Care Planning
COVID-19 Inquiry
Care plan failures
Thalassaemia Society Support
Infected Blood Inquiry
Care plan failures
Community Support Events
Infected Blood Inquiry
Care plan failures
Haemophilia Centre Resources
Infected Blood Inquiry
Care plan failures
Evaluation of Parental Involvement
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Informal user feedback
Parental Involvement in Training
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Informal user feedback
Patient Concern Organisation
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Informal user feedback
Draw up maternity risk assessment protocol
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Care plan failures
Audit maternity and paediatric services
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Care plan failures
Care planning system
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Care plan failures

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.