Susan Merton
PFD Report
Partially Responded
Ref: 2021-0375
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The Health Board consistently fails to implement its own action plan recommendations and address concerns within set timeframes, leading to ongoing risks to patient lives.
View full coroner's concerns
1. Evidence provided to me in the course of the investigation indicated that the Health Board had conducted an investigation and had produced an Action Plan in light of the findings of that investigation. The Action Plan required that the recommendations contained therein be reviewed in a Clinical Governance Meeting on the 5th of August 2021 however for reasons which could not be explained at the inquest, this was not done.
2. On previous occasions I have issued regulation 28 reports expressing concerns that the Health Board continually fail to accomplish actions in circumstances where they have set their own timeframe.
3. I am concerned that as a result of the Health Board failing to follow through with their own actions and recommendations either in a timely manner or in this specific case at all, lives are being put at risk.
Coroner's Office, County Hall, Wynnstay Road, Ruthin, LL15 1YN Tel 01824 708047 | Fax 01824 708048
2. On previous occasions I have issued regulation 28 reports expressing concerns that the Health Board continually fail to accomplish actions in circumstances where they have set their own timeframe.
3. I am concerned that as a result of the Health Board failing to follow through with their own actions and recommendations either in a timely manner or in this specific case at all, lives are being put at risk.
Coroner's Office, County Hall, Wynnstay Road, Ruthin, LL15 1YN Tel 01824 708047 | Fax 01824 708048
Responses
Action Taken
BCUHB changed its serious incident process in April 2021, requiring all investigation reports to be submitted for scrutiny and approval at an Incident Learning Panel. The Health Board is tracking actions and auditing compliance through its Datix patient safety system. (AI summary)
BCUHB changed its serious incident process in April 2021, requiring all investigation reports to be submitted for scrutiny and approval at an Incident Learning Panel. The Health Board is tracking actions and auditing compliance through its Datix patient safety system. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Gittins,
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Susan Merton
I write in response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent of Future Deaths issued by yourself to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, following the inquest touching the death of Susan Merton.
I would like to begin by offering my deepest condolences to the family and friends of Ms Merton, and I apologise for the concerns identified at the inquest that have given rise to your notice. I also apologise that this is the second notice you have issued in regards to the completion of actions following serious incident investigations.
I would like to assure you that direct conversations have been held with the responsible service and we are providing close oversight of quality and safety in that area.
As outlined in my response to the Regulation 28 regarding Mr Hurst, we changed our serious incident process in April 2021. From this date all investigation reports are submitted for scrutiny and approval at an Incident Learning Panel. This new step in the process adds an organisational level of scrutiny on all investigations completed by our clinical divisions and we have seen an improvement in the quality of reports and action plans as a result. A report without an action plan would not be accepted. I am very disappointed that our service did not complete an action plan when they should have done, nor was it completed on the right template when it was. Our new process ensures this cannot happen.
We are also now tracking actions from these investigation reports and action plans through our Datix patient safety system and auditing compliance with action completion timeframes and evidence.
Dyddiad / Date: 11th January 2022 Mr John Gittins Senior Coroner North Wales (East and Central) Coroner's Office County Hall Wynnstay Road Ruthin LL15 1YN
This new process covers incidents from April 2021 onwards. We recognise the case of Ms Merton, and Mr Hurst, occurred prior to this, so we have appointed a clinician to undertake a review of historic action plans to ensure actions are completed and evidence is available. This person commenced in post in November 2021, however they have been redeployed to front line services as a result of the current COVID wave, and we hope they will be available to return back to this important work during January 2022. This work will continue until we are assured of prior action plan completion.
I hope this letter offers you assurance that we have implemented a new system to address the concerns and provide greater oversight and assurance in the future. I also hope that our work to review action plans prior to the new process also offers assurance to you.
One again, please may I offer my condolences to the loved ones of Ms Hurst and my apologies for the concerns you have identified on this and other occasions.
Should you require any further information or evidence of the actions outlined above please contact either myself or , Associate Director of Quality Assurance.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Susan Merton
I write in response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent of Future Deaths issued by yourself to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, following the inquest touching the death of Susan Merton.
I would like to begin by offering my deepest condolences to the family and friends of Ms Merton, and I apologise for the concerns identified at the inquest that have given rise to your notice. I also apologise that this is the second notice you have issued in regards to the completion of actions following serious incident investigations.
I would like to assure you that direct conversations have been held with the responsible service and we are providing close oversight of quality and safety in that area.
As outlined in my response to the Regulation 28 regarding Mr Hurst, we changed our serious incident process in April 2021. From this date all investigation reports are submitted for scrutiny and approval at an Incident Learning Panel. This new step in the process adds an organisational level of scrutiny on all investigations completed by our clinical divisions and we have seen an improvement in the quality of reports and action plans as a result. A report without an action plan would not be accepted. I am very disappointed that our service did not complete an action plan when they should have done, nor was it completed on the right template when it was. Our new process ensures this cannot happen.
We are also now tracking actions from these investigation reports and action plans through our Datix patient safety system and auditing compliance with action completion timeframes and evidence.
Dyddiad / Date: 11th January 2022 Mr John Gittins Senior Coroner North Wales (East and Central) Coroner's Office County Hall Wynnstay Road Ruthin LL15 1YN
This new process covers incidents from April 2021 onwards. We recognise the case of Ms Merton, and Mr Hurst, occurred prior to this, so we have appointed a clinician to undertake a review of historic action plans to ensure actions are completed and evidence is available. This person commenced in post in November 2021, however they have been redeployed to front line services as a result of the current COVID wave, and we hope they will be available to return back to this important work during January 2022. This work will continue until we are assured of prior action plan completion.
I hope this letter offers you assurance that we have implemented a new system to address the concerns and provide greater oversight and assurance in the future. I also hope that our work to review action plans prior to the new process also offers assurance to you.
One again, please may I offer my condolences to the loved ones of Ms Hurst and my apologies for the concerns you have identified on this and other occasions.
Should you require any further information or evidence of the actions outlined above please contact either myself or , Associate Director of Quality Assurance.
Sent To
- Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 2
56-Day Deadline
4 Jan 2022
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 23rd of August 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Susan Merton (DOB 1.3.54 DOD 23.8.19) The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 5th of November 2021. The conclusion of the inquest was one of a death arising from natural causes with the cause of death being 1(a) Sepsis (b) Extrahepatic Biliary Obstructions, Pancreatitis (c) Common Bile Duct Stone 2. Hypertensive Heart Disease
Circumstances of the Death
The circumstances of this death are that the deceased had undergone a CT scan, the reporting of which failed to identify the presence of a common bile duct stone. When this was later recognised and appropriate treatment was scheduled to take place, the deceased’s condition suddenly deteriorated acutely and she passed away at Glan Clwyd Hospital on the 23rd of August 2019.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Address BTP systemic failings from Volume 1
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Major project lessons learned
LRF oversight of lessons from exercises and incidents
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Major project lessons learned
Continue implementing Total Quality Management Initiative and BS5750 quality systems
Hidden Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Major project lessons learned
Prioritise introduction of on-train data recorders for incident investigation assistance
Hidden Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Major project lessons learned
Utilise on-train data recorder information for systematic safety monitoring procedures
Hidden Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Major project lessons learned
Prioritise installation of driver-signalman radio communication on all traction units
Hidden Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Major project lessons learned
Fully implement Automatic Train Protection within five years, prioritising busy lines
Hidden Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Major project lessons learned
Complete research programme into structural integrity of rolling stock by April 1991
Hidden Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Major project lessons learned
Uniform policy for obtaining technical advice
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Major project lessons learned
Streamlining NHS construction quality procedures
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Major project lessons learned
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.