Charlie Todd
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2021-0318
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 15 Nov 2021
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A lack of supervisory oversight, inadequate staffing, and a manual, untracked system for hourly checks in the SACU led to incomplete observations and a failure to ensure prisoner safety.
View full coroner's concerns
During the course of the inquest evidence was heard from a number of witnesses of the supervision and staffing arrangements within SACU. The overall position was that there was no supervising officer present on a day to day basis to ensure key tasks were always allocated or completed, and officers, including officers not posted to the SACU, but covering for a shift, were required to allocate various tasks between themselves on an adhoc basis. On the 2nd September 2019 the document setting out which hourly checks had been undertaken in the SACU was incomplete. No check on Mr Todd’s cell took place at 3pm that day. Evidence was heard that staffing levels can vary, with officers being occupied on tasks which meant hourly checks could not always be completed. Whilst there is auditing of the hourly checks retrospectively, there is no ‘real time’ system which would alert officers and their supervisors to checks being incomplete for a prisoner/s as the record of checks are paper based and held in the SACU, as well there is no constant supervising officer present or other system there to ensure compliance.
Responses
Action Taken
HMP Durham has provided additional officer and administrative resources to the Separation and Care Unit (SACU). A "Know Your Job" sheet will be provided to staff working on the unit, and a SACU pilot will consider operational processes and health support. (AI summary)
HMP Durham has provided additional officer and administrative resources to the Separation and Care Unit (SACU). A "Know Your Job" sheet will be provided to staff working on the unit, and a SACU pilot will consider operational processes and health support. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Thompson
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 21 September 2021, addressed to the Governor of HMP Durham, following the recent inquest into the death of Charlie Todd at the prison on 2 September 2019. I am responding as Director General of Prisons.
I know that you will share a copy of this response with Mr Todd’s family and I would like to first express my condolences for their loss. Each death in custody is a tragedy and the safety of those in our care is my absolute priority.
You express concern regarding the staffing and supervision arrangements within the Separation and Care Unit (SACU), and completion of the required hourly checks.
I can assure you that there is clear management oversight of the SACU. The day-to-day running of the unit is directed by a dedicated Custodial Manager (CM), responsible for the allocation of tasks and performance management of the officers working there. The CM reports to, and is supported by, the Head of Residence and Safety (a Governor grade) who forms part of the Governor’s Senior Management Team. The running of the SACU is further subject to daily checks undertaken by the Orderly Officer and Duty Governor, and the Governor undertakes a weekly in-charge check.
I am confident that the staffing levels and supervisory arrangements in place are sufficient to deliver all of the SACU’s regime, and allow for the required checks to take place. The staffing of the SACU is in line with national benchmarking standards, and indeed the Governor has provided an additional officer resource, as well as an administration staff member in order to support the work of the SACU. HMP Durham have a weekly Regime Management Plan meeting which forecasts staffing levels for the following week to ensure that the regime across the prison is delivered and consistent.
It is inevitable that at some points staff who are not normally based in the SACU will be required to work on the unit for a shift, and in order to support those staff in understanding the expectations of the unit a “Know Your Job” sheet will be provided to them, setting out the tasks they will be required to cover.
Additionally, the SACU CM has been tasked with overseeing the daily and weekly management checks being carried out and will also provide an update to the Head of Residence, so that any reoccurring issues can be promptly addressed as appropriate with individual staff.
A recently commissioned SACU pilot, considering operational processes within the SACU and the management of segregated prisoners, will provide the prison with an opportunity to improve paperwork and will also be used to look at the health support provided on the unit with feedback used to strengthen current practices.
Given the number of checks that take place throughout the prison on a daily basis, implementing a ‘real-time’ system to ensure these have been done would require significant and prohibitive resource. I believe that the robust assurance processes already in place, together with the improvements made will ensure that prisoners located in the SACU at HMP Durham, can be safely managed.
Thank you again for bringing these matters of concern to my attention and for your suggestions, and I hope this provides you with the reassurances that you seek.
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 21 September 2021, addressed to the Governor of HMP Durham, following the recent inquest into the death of Charlie Todd at the prison on 2 September 2019. I am responding as Director General of Prisons.
I know that you will share a copy of this response with Mr Todd’s family and I would like to first express my condolences for their loss. Each death in custody is a tragedy and the safety of those in our care is my absolute priority.
You express concern regarding the staffing and supervision arrangements within the Separation and Care Unit (SACU), and completion of the required hourly checks.
I can assure you that there is clear management oversight of the SACU. The day-to-day running of the unit is directed by a dedicated Custodial Manager (CM), responsible for the allocation of tasks and performance management of the officers working there. The CM reports to, and is supported by, the Head of Residence and Safety (a Governor grade) who forms part of the Governor’s Senior Management Team. The running of the SACU is further subject to daily checks undertaken by the Orderly Officer and Duty Governor, and the Governor undertakes a weekly in-charge check.
I am confident that the staffing levels and supervisory arrangements in place are sufficient to deliver all of the SACU’s regime, and allow for the required checks to take place. The staffing of the SACU is in line with national benchmarking standards, and indeed the Governor has provided an additional officer resource, as well as an administration staff member in order to support the work of the SACU. HMP Durham have a weekly Regime Management Plan meeting which forecasts staffing levels for the following week to ensure that the regime across the prison is delivered and consistent.
It is inevitable that at some points staff who are not normally based in the SACU will be required to work on the unit for a shift, and in order to support those staff in understanding the expectations of the unit a “Know Your Job” sheet will be provided to them, setting out the tasks they will be required to cover.
Additionally, the SACU CM has been tasked with overseeing the daily and weekly management checks being carried out and will also provide an update to the Head of Residence, so that any reoccurring issues can be promptly addressed as appropriate with individual staff.
A recently commissioned SACU pilot, considering operational processes within the SACU and the management of segregated prisoners, will provide the prison with an opportunity to improve paperwork and will also be used to look at the health support provided on the unit with feedback used to strengthen current practices.
Given the number of checks that take place throughout the prison on a daily basis, implementing a ‘real-time’ system to ensure these have been done would require significant and prohibitive resource. I believe that the robust assurance processes already in place, together with the improvements made will ensure that prisoners located in the SACU at HMP Durham, can be safely managed.
Thank you again for bringing these matters of concern to my attention and for your suggestions, and I hope this provides you with the reassurances that you seek.
Sent To
- HMP Durham
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
15 Nov 2021
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 9th September 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of CHARLIE BRIAN TODD, 18 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 9th September 2021. The conclusion of the inquest was Misadventure. The medical cause of death was; 1a Pressure On Neck 1b Hanging The Jury set out their findings as; Mr Charlie Brian Todd was in HMP Durham and was admitted to SACU on 2/9/19 just after 10am that day. He was found by staff members in his cell at 16:04 hanging by a ligature around his neck. Resuscitation was commenced but was unsuccessful and unfortunately, he was pronounced dead at 1652 on 2/9/19.
Circumstances of the Death
On 2nd September 2019 Mr Todd, a prisoner at HMP Durham , was subject to an adjudication hearing which resulted in him being awarded a period of cellular confinement within the Segregation & Care Unit (SACU) within the same prison. He was confined in a cell within the SACU that morning and was to be the subject to regular hourly checks. At just after 4pm the same afternoon he was discovered to have ligatured in his cell and despite efforts to resuscitate him, he died at 4.52pm that day.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Quarterly assessment of staffing levels against population needs
Brook House Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
Ensure senior manager presence and accessibility to staff
Brook House Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
Responsibility for regulating and monitoring compliance
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
NHS Litigation Authority Improvement of risk management
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
Ensure adequate staffing by suitably trained personnel in station operations rooms
Fennell Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.