Pamela Evans

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2019-0333
Date of Report 4 October 2019
Coroner Amy Street
Response Deadline ✓ from report 29 November 2019
All 1 response received · Deadline: 29 Nov 2019
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Nurses had a fundamental misunderstanding of when to call the critical care outreach team, compounded by a lack of audit, limited CCOT authority, incorrect NEWS scoring, and the Trust's failure to identify these issues.
View full coroner's concerns
The evidence at the Inquest revealed:

(i) A mismatch between:

(a) on the one hand, the expressed intention of senior nursing staff as to when nurses should call the critical care outreach team if the relevant medical team is unable to attend, namely that nurses should call when they have concerns about a patient, irrespective of the patient’s NEWS score and

(b) on the other hand, the understanding of at least some nurses that they cannot or will not call the outreach team, despite having concerns, unless the NEWS score exceeds a specific number (5 or above, according to the cardiac nurse practitioner who cared for the deceased; 7 or above, according to a doctor setting out her experience of some nurses’ practice).

(ii) The absence of a means (eg audit) of assessing the understanding held by those who need to know (eg nurses), of when the critical care outreach team could/should be called; and therefore a lack of knowledge within the Trust of whether training on this point has been effective and comprehensive to all relevant people or whether further/different training needs to take place.

(iii) Even if the critical care outreach team had been called, a doctor would not initially attend, but rather a critical care nurse with limited power to take action – eg could not request a CT scan. I am therefore concerned that, if the relevant medical team is busy dealing with another emergency, a patient (eg with a head injury needing a CT scan) may still face delay receiving potentially life-saving measures, even if the critical care outreach team is called.

(iv) Incorrect recording of this patient’s NEWS and associated score after her fall which could in other circumstances influence whether/when potentially life-saving measures for future patients take place. Significantly, the deceased’s confusion at some point after 0500 should have been recorded as 3 under D (“consciousness”) but was never noted at all. It was not clear why; the cardiac nurse practitioner was aware of it and thought the clinical support worker completing the chart had been made aware. Further: first, vomiting after 0500 should have given a nausea score of 2 but was only scored 1; secondly, while a heart rate of 160 after 0500 was noted in the nursing records, only 93 was recorded in the NEWS observation chart at 0515.

(v) That points (i)-(iv) had not been detected by the Trust despite its carrying out of a serious incident investigation. I am therefore concerned that significant and potentially life-saving learning may be missed by the Trust in the future even if serious incident investigations are carried out.
Responses
Bedford Hospital NHS Trust NHS / Health Body
22 Nov 2019
Action Planned
Bedford Hospital NHS Trust will ensure assessments and patient observations are carried out. The post falls protocols and level of escalation will be reviewed and there will be Shared learning and a reminder on contacting the critical care outreach team. Learning from this investigation will be shared using multi-channel communications. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Street; Re: Inquest touching the death of Pamela EVANS Thank you for your letter of 7 October 2019 enclosing a Regulation 28 (Prevent Future Deaths) report in relation to an inquest touching the death of Mrs Pamela EVANS on 25
2019. would like to begin by expressing my condolences to Mrs Evans' family and saying how deeply sorry | am for her passing: As you know; the trust initiated a serious incident investigation following Mrs Evans' death, the outcome of which was shared with you; and you received live testimony at the inquest The investigation found there was a in Mrs Evans being reviewed by a doctor following her fall due to other clinical emergencies happening at the same time; your regulatory notice acknowledged any earlier review or intervention would not have changed the outcome for Mrs Evans_ While the hospital's serious incident investigation and your own inquest was unable to determine whether Mrs Evans suffered an event that caused her to fall; or the subsequent bleed was caused by the fall, you concluded Mrs Evans 'had been appropriately attended by nursing staff and the fall was not preventable_ However; during the course of the inquest you heard evidence that; while accepting the fall was not preventable nor would there have been a different outcome, you believe this gave rise of sufficient concern to issue a Regulation 28 notice highlighting five issues am enclosing an action plan to provide you with assurance of specific actions in mitigation of your concerns, and would also to provide you with some context on the issues and for sake of clarity will address those in order. NEWS training and escalation Following every inquest the chief executive and receive an update from my representatives_ Whilst our commitment and expectation is to ensure all 1363 nursing staff are trained, including temporary staff;, it is disappointing that one bank nurse was not able to communicate to court her training record and understanding of implementing NEWS2 _ It is additionally disappointing as understand two of my senior nursing team provided evidence in articulating the training and teaching of NEWS2 across the trust_ Amy Ms July delay like the the

WHS Bedford Hospital NHS Trust The Trust takes patient safety seriously and is compliant with our duties to implement national patient safety initiatives NEWS2 was launched in September 2018 and the trust had to report compliance by April 2019 and undertook: Direct clinical training with all nursing staff highlighting that escalation is based on experience and professional curiosity as well as numerical scoring Launched a new NEWS score sticker to be incorporated into patient notes to evidence escalation. Communicated through hospital cascade mechanism the use and expected compliance of NEWS2 have asked for some actions to be taken to provide assurance to myself: Absence of evidence that staff know the routes of escalation for deteriorating patients apologise if at the time of the inquest Trust representatives were not able to provide you with assurance on staff knowledge regarding the routes for escalation for deteriorating patients_ The trust has undertaken substantial work over the past two years on identifying and escalating deteriorating patients. Part of which has been to: Provide tools and mechanisms to identify patients who are deteriorating Being clear on routes of escalations and that clinical experience and knowledge is used as well as numerical scoring Use trust-wide training opportunities across the trust as annual clinical updates monthly shared learning sessions, patients safety update bulletins Capture data on training through regular ward quality huddles; daily safety huddles; regular audits of compliance Capture data of associated tools of measurement such as the use of treatment escalation plans (TEP) and regular clinical audits have asked for some actions to be taken to provide assurance to myself. Critical care outreach team initial response understand from my representatives sought to give clarity regarding the clinical experience and ability of the critical care outreach team: am sorry if this was not clear: The critical care outreach team is a multidisciplinary team utilising highly qualified staff; predominately nurses, who have undergone at least three years training in critical care_ deteriorating patients, multi-organ failure and treatment plans. These nurses are integral to a first line response for escalation and have the skills and authority to develop treatment plans for patients, asking ward staff to closely monitor and continue to escalate for further advice have access to the twenty-four hour critical care medical team. In addition, all patients reviewed by the outreach team will be reviewed Monday to Friday by a designated critical care consultant_ It would be wrong to suggest the critical care outreach team response must be by a doctor in order to safeguard patient welfare. The disciplines and patient-review process of the critical care outreach team at Bedford hospital is in line with national standards for the provision of outreach services am aware you highlighted a situation where a CT for a patient was needed and the critical care outreach nurse would not be able to do that: To be clear; nurses do not request scans such as CT and any request would be escalated to an appropriate doctor: am not aware of any patient that has been adversely affected by the critical care outreach nurses attending patient rather than a doctor such they They

WHS Bedford Hospital MHS Trust Calculating consciousness in NEWS2 understand during the live evidence you heard that the NEWS2 algorithm now includes the status of 'new confusion' as an additional scoring metric and that while the notes recorded Mrs Evans had a degree of confusion this was omitted on the scoring sheet leading to an inaccurate calculation_ This was wrong and have asked my director of nursing to ensure all nurses are reminded of their duty to assess, score and record properly patients overall observations However; while you have rightly drawn to my attention the mis-scoring; the absence of the confusion score had no effect on Mrs Evans as her overall deterioration was recognised and escalated to the medical team in a timely manner: Hospital Sl report did not acknowledge or highlight these issues Thank you for drawing my attention to these issues_ As you know a serious incident report is to ensure gaps in care, root causes and learning are identified order to protect future patients and improve our practice. The serious incident investigation reviewed in detail the actions, decision making, escalation and factors that contributed or impacted on Mrs Evans fall and subsequent deterioration. However, for clarity, the serious investigation did consider elements of actions and decision making that may have impacted on Mrs Evans and which led to a number of recommendations in the report including: Ensuring assessments and patient observations are carried out Review of the post falls protocols and level of escalation Shared learning and reminder on contacting the critical care outreach team Using multi-channel communications to share learning from this investigation do not believe the investigation fell short of what it intended: hope you have found my points of clarity constructive and please find enclosed the trust's action plan in relation to your regulatory notice; some of which specifically refer to ongoing actions such as continual audits and training: remain satisfied that immediate actions and learning have been completed. In addition to the recommendations from our internal investigation we have listened to the evidence from the inquest;, the family's concerns, and your recommendations and am confident this action plan does support ongoing care for deteriorating patients_ For your information to ensure ongoing patient safety learning the trust is holding monthly lunchtime learning sessions, open to all clinicians, where we present learning from serious incidents and have asked Mrs Evans case and your concerns are highlighted at a forthcoming session_ These sessions will be led by my medical director and have asked him to ensure ongoing learning and compliance extending from this investigation and inquest.

NHS Bedford Hospital NHS Trust While, patient safety is a priority for Bedford hospital and know it to be a safe_ compassionate and caring hospital with staff committed to ensuing patients are well cared for; we can always learn and appreciate your feedback Please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information:
Sent To
  • Bedford Hospital NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 29 Nov 2019
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 8 November 2018 the Senior Coroner for Bedfordshire & Luton commenced an investigation was into the death of Pamela Evans, aged 87. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest held by me, on 25 July 2019, when my determinations and conclusion were delivered. The medical cause of death was found to be: “1a Large right-sided acute on chronic subdural haematoma”.

The Conclusion of the Inquest was a Narrative Conclusion: “Pamela Evans died as a result of becoming dizzy and falling in hospital, hitting her head. At the time of the fall she had been appropriately attended by nursing staff and the fall was not preventable. The cause of the fall was medical, rather than mechanical, although the precise cause is unknown. She was under cardiac investigation for dizziness, fainting and falls which had so far proved inconclusive.”
Circumstances of the Death
Pamela Evans was admitted to Bedford Hospital on 18th October 2018 after she fell and hit her head at home (having experienced recurrent falls following dizziness/fainting). She was admitted to the coronary care unit. On 26th October 2018 an implantable loop recorder was inserted in order to record heart rhythm and she was due to be discharged on 29th October 2018. On 29th October 2018 at 0345 she was on her way to the toilet with her frame and one nurse, in accordance with the mobility care plan. Before entering the toilet she was stationary with her frame in front of her and the nurse behind her, and she became dizzy and fell, twisting forwards, between the wall and toilet, hitting her head. Greater assistance from nursing staff was not warranted and would have risked compromising her mobility and independence, and the fall could not have been prevented. She subsequently, albeit not immediately, deteriorated. Despite the increasing concern of nursing staff, she was not seen by a doctor until 0600; the relevant medical team was attending a cardiac arrest and the critical care outreach team was not called. However earlier medical review would have made no difference to the outcome. A CT scan around 0625 showed a large right-sided acute on chronic subdural haematoma. This had been caused by the fall earlier that morning. Following consultation with family members, palliative care only was provided. Pamela Evans died at Bedford Hospital on 4th November 2018.
Copies Sent To
. , Chair of the National Outreach Forum
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Apply full and fair meaning consistently across all schemes
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Allow 3-month window to accept Fixed Sum Offer after assessment
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Regular CCTV review with swipe card data
Fuller Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Share HTA reports with reliant organisations
Fuller Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Board review governance - assurance not reassurance
Fuller Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Board oversight of licensed mortuary activity
Fuller Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Treat HTA compliance as Trust statutory responsibility
Fuller Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Chief Nurse responsible for mortuary assurance
Fuller Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
No deceased left out of fridges overnight
Fuller Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight
Audit and monitor mortuary access
Fuller Inquiry
Quality and safety oversight

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.